← Back

CLASS 6A · District 10-6A

Tyler Legacy Red Raiders

Enrollment: 2,800 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#127

was #127

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1473

#127 of 249

OVR Grade

76.2

#127 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Texarkana Texas High	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
2	@Tyler	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
3	Mesquite	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
4	#44Rockwall-Heath (0-0) 1927	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
5	@Mesquite Horn (0-0) 1599	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
7	#8North Forney (0-0) 2478	< 2% (-40)	—	—	—	—
8	@#46Rockwall (0-0) 1908	14% (-17)	—	—	—	—
9	#14Longview (0-0) 2322	3% (-34)	—	—	—	—
10	Forney (0-0) 1808	20% (-13)	—	—	—	—
11	@Royse City (0-0) 1686	29% (-9)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 10-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		8	North Forney (5) Falcons	91.4 2478	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.4-0.6	> 98%	D2
2		14	Longview (8) Lobos	89 2322	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
3		44	Rockwall-Heath (1) Hawks	83 1927	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.8-3.2	70.5%	D1
4		46	Rockwall (3) Yellowjackets	82.8 1908	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	65%	D1
5		61	Forney (2) Jackrabbits	81.2 1808	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	38.6%	—
6		77	Royse City (4) Bulldogs	79.4 1686	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	16.7%	—
7		92	Mesquite Horn (7) Jaguars	78.1 1599	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.8-5.2	8%	—
8		127	Tyler Legacy (6) Red Raiders	76.2 1473	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	2.2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Tyler Legacy’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004

12-3

Rating 735 (96th)

#2 · 2009

5-6

Rating 681 (92nd)

#3 · 2006

9-3

Rating 658 (89th)

#4 · 2008

7-5

Rating 654 (88th)

#5 · 2010

2-9

Rating 611 (80th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1323	27.4	46.5	−19.1	1816	+3.8	+8.1	−4.4	1391	−3.18	+0.38	−3.56	502(45th)
2024	3-7	1346	24.3	40.1	−15.8	1762	−1.1	+4.8	−5.8	1354	−3.51	+0.65	−4.15	494(42nd)
2023	3-8	1372	15.6	29.0	−13.4	1694	−8.9	−4.3	−4.5	1387	−4.12	+0.64	−4.75	501(44th)
2022	2-8	1341	16.9	36.7	−19.8	1696	−7.4	+3.8	−11.2	1220	−4.12	+0.21	−4.33	468(33rd)
2021	6-6	1749	32.5	34.1	−1.6	1834	+9.6	−1.6	+11.2	1780	+0.06	+1.40	−1.34	598(77th)
2020	6-6	1854	32.9	31.0	+1.9	1791	+11.7	−5.2	+17.0	1924	−0.52	+1.73	−2.25	607(79th)
2019	6-5	1739	26.0	25.1	+0.9	1755	+1.5	−9.6	+11.1	1777	−0.42	+1.36	−1.79	579(71st)
2018	2-8	1357	26.5	47.2	−20.7	1768	+3.2	+13.0	−9.9	1253	−4.29	+0.29	−4.58	477(35th)
2017	6-4	1748	34.1	31.5	+2.6	1682	+7.9	−2.2	+10.1	1753	−0.55	+1.33	−1.87	574(70th)
2016	2-8	1438	34.2	41.5	−7.3	1723	+6.0	+4.1	+1.9	1547	−3.83	+0.29	−4.12	519(52nd)
2015	5-5	1663	44.8	49.1	−4.3	1586	+15.9	+15.8	+0.1	1503	−1.52	+1.04	−2.56	533(56th)
2014	5-6	1642	44.3	41.8	+2.5	1613	+15.3	+7.7	+7.6	1691	−1.44	+1.40	−2.84	556(64th)
2013	3-6	1607	27.6	39.3	−11.8	1827	+4.2	+2.4	+1.8	1546	−0.82	+1.78	−2.60	546(61st)
2012	0-9	1190	12.7	38.9	−26.2	1854	−9.5	+2.7	−12.2	1194	−4.75	0.00	−4.75	465(32nd)
2011	1-9	1433	16.5	39.0	−22.5	2052	+0.5	+0.7	−0.1	1497	−2.46	+0.65	−3.12	538(58th)
2010	2-9	1775	18.1	28.4	−10.3	2074	−0.3	−12.6	+12.4	1809	−1.92	+0.53	−2.45	611(80th)
2009	5-6	2122	23.7	22.5	+1.2	2028	+7.0	−16.5	+23.6	2089	+1.03	+2.70	−1.68	681(92nd)
2008	7-5	1942	25.4	14.3	+11.1	1777	+4.5	−18.0	+22.5	2064	+0.60	+2.39	−1.79	654(88th)
2007	5-6	1695	16.6	20.5	−3.9	1804	−2.6	−10.8	+8.2	1705	−1.15	+0.96	−2.11	578(71st)
2006	9-3	2023	21.6	14.0	+7.6	1777	+1.7	−16.9	+18.5	1963	+2.38	+2.89	−0.50	658(89th)
2005	4-6	1737	19.4	28.6	−9.2	1705	+0.8	−2.3	+3.2	1579	−2.35	+0.94	−3.28	557(64th)
2004	12-3	2390	36.1	16.7	+19.4	1830	+17.9	−13.9	+31.8	2296	+4.15	+5.42	−1.27	735(96th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.