← Back
CLASS 6A · District 26-6A

Austin High Maroons

Enrollment: 2,239 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#180
was #180
Record
1-5
1-2 district
Elo
1184
#180 of 249
OVR Grade
71.8
#180 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67.6
#200 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
74.7
#124 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1229
#168 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
2
Round Rock Westwood (1-6) 1059
 32% (-7) L 20-24 942 −15.2 +7.2 — −0.92
3
Jarrell
 8% (-23) L 13-32 1188 −11.7 +0.7 — −0.70
4
Georgetown East View (2-4) 1209
 38% (-4) L 24-34 985 −9.6 +11.0 — −0.95
5
Austin Bowie (5-1) 1816
 4% (-31) L 3-31 1253 −19.0 −9.1 — −0.59
6
@Buda Hays Consolidated (4-3) 1432
 5% (-28) W 35-28 1714 +6.2 −2.3 +0.33 —
7
#26Dripping Springs (5-1) 2153
 < 2% (-39) L 3-41 1294 −13.6 −5.3 — −0.22
8
@Austin Del Valle (1-5) 681
 89% (+20) — — — — — —
9
Austin Akins (1-5) 282
 98% (+36) — — — — — —
10
@Buda Johnson (2-5) 1279
 40% (-4) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 26-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 26
Tigers
86.5
2153
 5-1 3-0 49.0 15.7 5.8-0.2 > 98% D2
2 65
Bulldogs
81.4
1816
 5-1 2-0 45.2 18.5 5.1-0.9 > 98% D1
3 137
Hawks
75.6
1432
 4-3 1-2 34.0 25.9 3-3 92.8% D2
4 168
Jaguars
73.3
1279
 2-5 1-2 24.1 38.7 2.7-3.3 58.5% D1
5 180
Maroons
71.8
1184
 1-5 1-2 16.3 31.7 3.3-2.7 48.1% —
6 234
Cardinals
64.2
681
 1-5 1-1 19.7 39.0 1.2-4.8 < 2% —
7 248
Eagles
58.2
282
 1-5 0-2 13.7 52.3 0-6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin High’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2006
7-4
Rating 608 (80th)
#2 · 2007
8-3
Rating 588 (75th)
#3 · 2020
5-4
Rating 539 (58th)
#4 · 2009
5-5
Rating 532 (56th)
#5 · 2015
7-4
Rating 530 (55th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 1131 13.6 37.0 −23.4 1592 −11.2 +7.5 −18.7 1033 −4.15 +0.04 −4.19 428(21st)
2024 5-6 1363 24.5 38.2 −13.6 1699 −1.0 +5.2 −6.2 1345 −1.60 +0.76 −2.37 490(41st)
2023 3-7 986 18.2 34.7 −16.5 1495 −7.9 +8.7 −16.5 1086 −4.15 +0.18 −4.33 425(21st)
2022 2-8 874 13.8 41.0 −27.2 1641 −12.4 +8.8 −21.2 969 −4.40 +0.26 −4.66 392(13th)
2021 2-8 1028 15.9 46.5 −30.6 1583 −14.0 +13.6 −27.6 811 −5.14 +0.03 −5.18 381(11th)
2020 5-4 1480 38.4 39.7 −1.2 1717 +15.1 +6.4 +8.7 1716 −0.43 +0.51 −0.94 539(58th)
2019 4-6 1243 32.4 50.2 −17.8 1565 +3.6 +17.4 −13.8 1156 −2.85 +0.44 −3.29 448(27th)
2018 3-7 1224 32.2 42.2 −10.0 1535 +4.0 +11.7 −7.8 1306 −3.85 +0.09 −3.95 467(32nd)
2017 2-1 1343 42.0 29.0 +13.0 996 −0.3 +7.2 −7.5 1311 −0.86 +0.05 −0.91 —
2016 0-2 1320 33.5 41.0 −7.5 930 −7.0 +20.5 −27.5 812 −1.91 0.00 −1.91 —
2015 7-4 1607 29.0 31.8 −2.8 1574 +3.2 +2.5 +0.7 1517 −0.42 +0.58 −1.00 530(55th)
2014 6-5 1405 31.4 40.3 −8.9 1423 +1.3 +12.2 −10.9 1226 −1.80 +0.44 −2.23 473(34th)
2013 3-7 1135 15.5 31.4 −15.9 1474 −13.6 +3.4 −17.0 1075 −3.77 +0.13 −3.90 430(22nd)
2012 3-7 1086 23.6 33.5 −9.9 1506 −1.5 +7.8 −9.3 1268 −4.23 +0.08 −4.30 451(28th)
2011 2-9 1202 20.9 44.6 −23.7 1665 −2.5 +16.1 −18.6 1035 −4.45 +0.15 −4.60 434(23rd)
2010 4-7 1422 23.7 32.0 −8.3 1680 −2.0 +0.4 −2.3 1442 −3.03 +0.76 −3.79 508(47th)
2009 5-5 1460 25.6 22.9 +2.7 1514 +0.4 −3.8 +4.2 1604 −2.73 +0.50 −3.24 532(56th)
2008 6-5 1527 28.3 26.8 +1.5 1448 +0.3 +0.4 −0.1 1497 −2.37 +0.25 −2.62 524(54th)
2007 8-3 1761 31.0 19.2 +11.8 1475 +4.1 −8.1 +12.2 1804 −0.20 +1.30 −1.50 588(75th)
2006 7-4 1711 29.0 14.6 +14.4 1534 +3.3 −12.8 +16.1 1902 −1.37 +1.45 −2.82 608(80th)
2005 5-5 1366 23.5 25.9 −2.4 1431 −6.3 −2.3 −4.0 1400 −2.84 +0.32 −3.15 501(44th)
2004 4-6 1102 20.3 27.8 −7.5 1356 −6.9 +5.9 −12.8 1179 −4.47 +0.52 −4.99 449(27th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.