| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Round Rock Cedar Ridge (7-0) 1852 |
22% (-12) | L 6-21 | 1645 | −15.8 | −21.6 | — | −0.83 |
| 2 | Brenham |
20% (-13) | L 16-59 | 440 | −11.7 | +30.7 | — | −0.83 |
| 3 | Liberty Hill Legacy Ranch |
69% (+8) | W 56-15 | 1850 | +14.5 | +0.5 | +0.02 | — |
| 4 | @Austin High (1-5) 1184 |
62% (+4) | W 34-24 | 1424 | +2.7 | +5.7 | +0.03 | — |
| 5 | Hutto (5-2) 1894 |
6% (-26) | L 7-61 | 912 | −16.6 | +7.0 | — | −0.47 |
| 6 | 3% (-33) | L 14-28 | 1618 | −5.1 | −9.8 | — | −0.31 | |
| 8 | Cedar Park Vista Ridge (2-5) 1360 |
35% (-6) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | 2% (-35) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 10 | Leander (1-5) 798 |
85% (+16) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Leander Rouse (4-3) 1600 |
16% (-16) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#175
was #174
Record
2-4
0-2 district
Elo
1209
#175 of 249
OVR Grade
72.2
#175 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
71.2
#165 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
73.2
#141 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1315
#156 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 24-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Georgetown East View’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.