← Back
CLASS 6A · District 24-6A

Georgetown East View Patriots

Enrollment: 2,321 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5
Rank
#184
was #184
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1173
#184 of 249
OVR Grade
71.7
#184 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1 22% (-12)
2
Brenham
22% (-12)
3
Liberty Hill Legacy Ranch
76% (+11)
4
@Austin High (0-0) 1099
58% (+3)
5
Hutto (0-0) 1693
10% (-21)
6
@#23Austin Vandegrift (0-0) 2164
< 2% (-40)
8 14% (-17)
9
@#49Cedar Park (0-0) 1896
5% (-29)
10
Leander (0-0) 803
82% (+15)
11
@Leander Rouse (0-0) 1250
42% (-3)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 24-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 23
Vipers
86.6
2164
0-0 0-0 5.5-0.5 > 98% D2
2 49
Timberwolves
82.6
1896
0-0 0-0 4.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 76
Hippos
79.5
1693
0-0 0-0 3.8-2.2 93.1% D1
4 91
Rangers
78.1
1601
0-0 0-0 3.3-2.7 85.1% D1
5 174
Raiders
72.8
1250
0-0 0-0 1.9-4.1 14.6%
6 184
Patriots
71.7
1173
0-0 0-0 1.6-4.4 8.1%
7 228
Lions
66.1
803
0-0 0-0 0.4-5.6 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Georgetown East View’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 0-1 1178 20.0 42.0 −22.0 1165 −14.1 +15.9 −30.0 749 −0.84 0.00 −0.84
2024 0-1 1042 22.0 28.0 −6.0 1286 −9.6 +1.3 −10.9 1228 −0.87 0.00 −0.87
2023 1-1 982 30.0 27.5 +2.5 1325 −0.4 +2.1 −2.4 1439 −0.91 +0.03 −0.94
2022 0-2 950 18.0 40.5 −22.5 1132 −19.1 +19.2 −38.3 543 −1.96 0.00 −1.96
2021 1-0 1356 41.0 13.0 +28.0 1042 +0.6 −5.0 +5.6 1639 +0.13 +0.13 0.00
2020 0-2 1146 22.0 45.5 −23.5 1510 −8.4 +14.4 −22.8 930 −1.74 0.00 −1.74
2019 2-0 1285 41.5 35.0 +6.5 1178 +2.5 +6.5 −4.0 1399 +0.22 +0.22 0.00
2018 0-2 1037 32.5 42.0 −9.5 1413 −0.7 +11.9 −12.6 1186 −1.73 0.00 −1.73
2017 0-1 1062 36.0 48.0 −12.0 1453 +9.8 +12.8 −3.0 1424 −0.88 0.00 −0.88
2016 0-1 1081 18.0 26.0 −8.0 1359 −9.9 −1.5 −8.4 1290 −0.80 0.00 −0.80
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.