← Back

CLASS 6A · District 26-6A

Buda Hays Consolidated Hawks

Enrollment: 2,334 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#95

was #95

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1593

#95 of 249

OVR Grade

78

#95 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@San Marcos (0-0) 1583	51% (+0)	—	—	—	—
2	Seguin	73% (+10)	—	—	—	—
3	@#34Killeen Harker Heights (0-0) 1972	17% (-15)	—	—	—	—
4	Leander (0-0) 803	96% (+32)	—	—	—	—
5	@Buda Johnson (0-0) 1331	75% (+10)	—	—	—	—
6	Austin High (0-0) 1099	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
7	@Austin Bowie (0-0) 1700	39% (-4)	—	—	—	—
9	#26Dripping Springs (0-0) 2147	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
10	@Austin Del Valle (0-0) 904	95% (+28)	—	—	—	—
11	Austin Akins (0-0) 892	95% (+28)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 26-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		26	Dripping Springs (4) Tigers	86.4 2147	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-0.3	> 98%	D2
2		74	Austin Bowie (3) Bulldogs	79.6 1700	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-1.6	> 98%	D1
3		95	Buda Hays Consolidated (5) Hawks	78 1593	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-2	96.8%	D2
4		159	Buda Johnson (2) Jaguars	74.1 1331	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.9-3.1	75.8%	D1
5		196	Austin High (7) Maroons	70.6 1099	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-4.1	20.2%	—
6		220	Austin Del Valle (1) Cardinals	67.6 904	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-5	4.7%	—
7		222	Austin Akins (6) Eagles	67.4 892	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-5	4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Buda Hays Consolidated’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2020

10-4

Rating 659 (89th)

#2 · 2005

10-2

Rating 616 (81st)

#3 · 2019

8-3

Rating 591 (75th)

#4 · 2018

8-3

Rating 581 (72nd)

#5 · 2004

8-3

Rating 558 (65th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2023	1-1	1311	21.5	17.5	+4.0	863	−14.6	+6.1	−20.7	983	−0.94	+0.00	−0.95	—
2022	2-0	1566	45.5	10.5	+35.0	998	+7.5	−4.0	+11.4	1786	+0.08	+0.08	0.00	—
2021	3-7	1483	35.3	49.2	−13.9	1755	+11.0	+14.8	−3.8	1405	−3.47	+0.34	−3.81	505(46th)
2020	10-4	2208	33.1	32.5	+0.6	1809	+11.9	−4.1	+16.0	1899	+2.71	+3.49	−0.78	659(89th)
2019	8-3	1862	38.2	32.1	+6.1	1636	+10.6	−1.9	+12.5	1813	+0.93	+1.18	−0.26	591(75th)
2018	8-3	1806	35.5	31.0	+4.5	1617	+8.7	−2.0	+10.7	1767	+1.39	+1.54	−0.15	581(72nd)
2017	4-7	1453	32.7	30.1	+2.6	1726	+7.2	−2.8	+10.1	1752	−2.17	+0.20	−2.37	548(61st)
2016	3-7	1359	23.6	31.6	−8.0	1723	+1.1	+0.4	+0.7	1517	−3.15	+0.15	−3.31	508(47th)
2015	5-5	1524	27.0	26.9	+0.1	1599	+1.3	−2.8	+4.2	1604	−1.49	+0.55	−2.03	534(57th)
2014	4-6	1417	27.5	35.4	−7.9	1492	−2.3	+5.1	−7.4	1315	−2.98	+0.14	−3.12	486(39th)
2013	1-0	1451	21.0	7.0	+14.0	874	−13.9	−3.3	−10.7	1233	+0.02	+0.02	0.00	—
2012	1-0	1431	35.0	7.0	+28.0	925	−2.2	−6.1	+3.8	1596	+0.06	+0.06	0.00	—
2011	2-1	1351	37.3	20.7	+16.7	940	−1.8	+5.8	−7.7	1308	−0.61	+0.04	−0.65	—
2010	2-1	1297	34.3	26.0	+8.3	1141	−3.4	+4.9	−8.3	1292	−0.72	+0.10	−0.82	—
2009	0-3	1134	10.3	31.7	−21.3	1643	−12.1	+4.9	−17.0	1075	−2.33	0.00	−2.33	—
2008	1-2	1476	25.0	34.7	−9.7	1326	−5.3	+6.7	−12.0	1200	−1.39	+0.10	−1.49	—
2007	1-1	1653	17.5	24.5	−7.0	1353	−9.5	+1.5	−11.0	1226	−0.56	+0.04	−0.59	—
2006	1-1	1770	19.0	19.0	0.0	1478	−5.0	−5.1	+0.1	1502	−0.51	+0.14	−0.65	—
2005	10-2	1907	44.3	24.8	+19.6	1419	+14.7	−1.3	+16.0	1901	+1.01	+1.55	−0.54	616(81st)
2004	8-3	1611	28.9	18.2	+10.7	1405	+1.6	−3.9	+5.5	1637	−1.08	+0.90	−1.98	558(65th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.