← Back

CLASS 6A · District 17-6A

Channelview Falcons

Enrollment: 2,863 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#200

was #200

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1063

#200 of 249

OVR Grade

70

#200 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Spring (0-0) 955	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
2	@Aldine MacArthur (0-0) 724	80% (+14)	—	—	—	—
3	Clear Creek (0-0) 1136	42% (-3)	—	—	—	—
4	@#5Humble Summer Creek (0-0) 2589	< 2% (-61)	—	—	—	—
5	Humble Kingwood (0-0) 1718	6% (-26)	—	—	—	—
6	@Crosby (0-0) 1478	15% (-17)	—	—	—	—
7	#12Humble Atascocita (0-0) 2401	< 2% (-54)	—	—	—	—
9	@Humble (0-0) 1449	17% (-15)	—	—	—	—
10	#1Galena Park North Shore (0-0) 2731	< 2% (-67)	—	—	—	—
11	@#7Sheldon CE King (0-0) 2509	< 2% (-58)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 17-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		1	Galena Park North Shore (1) Mustangs	95.2 2731	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.1-0.9	> 98%	D1
2		5	Humble Summer Creek (2) Bulldogs	93 2589	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3		7	Sheldon CE King (3) Panthers	91.8 2509	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.2-1.8	> 98%	D2
4		12	Humble Atascocita (4) Eagles	90.2 2401	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-2.2	97%	D2
5		70	Humble Kingwood (7) Mustangs	79.9 1718	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.4	3.9%	—
6		122	Crosby (8) Cougars	76.3 1478	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.7-5.3	< 2%	—
7		134	Humble (5) Wildcats	75.8 1449	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.6-5.4	< 2%	—
8		200	Channelview (6) Falcons	70 1063	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.4-6.6	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Channelview’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015

7-4

Rating 569 (68th)

#2 · 2014

7-3

Rating 567 (68th)

#3 · 2011

5-5

Rating 534 (57th)

#4 · 2022

8-3

Rating 527 (54th)

#5 · 2021

6-5

Rating 507 (47th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	988	14.6	48.2	−33.6	1716	−10.9	+13.1	−24.0	900	−4.88	+0.02	−4.89	398(14th)
2024	1-9	1184	16.6	43.1	−26.5	1664	−8.1	+10.7	−18.8	1030	−4.55	+0.00	−4.56	433(23rd)
2023	5-6	1347	33.5	33.1	+0.5	1296	+1.7	+7.9	−6.3	1343	−4.14	+0.18	−4.32	492(41st)
2022	8-3	1625	36.0	28.5	+7.5	1258	+4.4	+5.5	−1.2	1471	−1.21	+0.93	−2.14	527(54th)
2021	6-5	1340	41.3	30.3	+11.0	1224	+6.6	+5.1	+1.5	1537	−3.30	+0.24	−3.54	507(47th)
2020	4-5	1187	31.2	37.3	−6.1	1183	−1.6	+15.6	−17.2	1070	−3.15	+0.06	−3.21	426(21st)
2019	4-6	1300	25.2	34.3	−9.1	1590	−0.8	+3.8	−4.6	1385	−3.03	+0.45	−3.48	484(38th)
2018	4-7	1376	33.5	40.2	−6.6	1608	+4.4	+6.8	−2.3	1442	−3.58	+0.36	−3.95	499(44th)
2017	3-6	1379	25.3	38.4	−13.1	1587	−1.6	+7.2	−8.7	1282	−3.31	+0.30	−3.60	478(36th)
2016	5-6	1544	28.3	40.2	−11.9	1569	+2.1	+11.2	−9.1	1273	−2.16	+0.65	−2.81	491(41st)
2015	7-4	1614	48.0	35.8	+12.2	1529	+19.1	+6.9	+12.1	1804	−0.94	+0.68	−1.62	569(68th)
2014	7-3	1555	48.9	32.0	+16.9	1417	+18.8	+5.7	+13.2	1829	−0.68	+1.39	−2.07	567(68th)
2013	4-6	1189	25.8	36.6	−10.8	1430	−2.5	+11.0	−13.5	1163	−3.36	+0.28	−3.64	446(27th)
2012	1-9	921	10.7	40.4	−29.7	1559	−15.7	+11.3	−27.0	825	−5.97	+0.10	−6.08	378(11th)
2011	5-5	1463	36.8	32.8	+4.0	1522	+9.8	+5.3	+4.5	1612	−1.88	+0.74	−2.62	534(57th)
2010	1-9	850	15.3	33.4	−18.1	1588	−10.7	+3.8	−14.5	1137	−6.02	+0.05	−6.07	416(18th)
2009	1-9	919	16.1	34.6	−18.5	1538	−9.5	+8.3	−17.8	1055	−6.73	+0.16	−6.88	410(17th)
2008	0-8	938	11.8	31.1	−19.4	1479	−11.6	+7.6	−19.2	1019	−6.19	0.00	−6.19	408(17th)
2007	4-6	1347	19.2	21.9	−2.7	1381	−7.1	−0.8	−6.3	1343	−4.22	+0.33	−4.56	489(40th)
2006	3-7	1223	23.2	26.7	−3.5	1445	−5.2	+0.9	−6.1	1347	−5.21	+0.46	−5.67	479(36th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.