| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Dayton |
28% (-9) | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | @Barbers Hill (0-0) 1822 |
19% (-14) | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | Fort Bend Marshall |
18% (-14) | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | #1Galena Park North Shore (0-0) 2731 |
< 2% (-50) | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | < 2% (-41) | — | — | — | — | |
| 6 | Channelview (0-0) 1063 |
85% (+17) | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | @Humble Kingwood (0-0) 1718 |
27% (-10) | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | #5Humble Summer Creek (0-0) 2589 |
< 2% (-44) | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | #12Humble Atascocita (0-0) 2401 |
2% (-37) | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Humble (0-0) 1449 |
53% (+1) | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||
Rank
#122
was #122
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1478
#122 of 249
OVR Grade
76.3
#122 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 17-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) |
OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Crosby’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.