| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lancaster |
96% (+31) | W 35-0 | 2949 | +18.5 | −39.5 | +0.60 | — |
| 2 | @John Curtis (LA) |
84% (+15) | W 27-17 | — | — | — | +0.89 | — |
| 3 | @South Oak Cliff |
73% (+9) | W 23-21 | 2531 | +14.6 | −26.6 | +0.94 | — |
| 4 | @Crosby (4-3) 1793 |
> 98% (+41) | W 58-0 | 3261 | +35.0 | −35.4 | +0.37 | — |
| 5 | #16Humble Atascocita (4-3) 2319 |
77% (+11) | W 35-0 | 3189 | +26.0 | −41.6 | +0.93 | — |
| 6 | @Humble (1-6) 1472 |
> 98% (+53) | W 41-0 | 2533 | +12.0 | −29.4 | +0.17 | — |
| 7 | 86% (+17) | W 28-27 | 2455 | +19.4 | −18.9 | +0.90 | — | |
| 9 | #6Sheldon CE King (6-1) 2580 |
73% (+9) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Channelview (0-7) 780 |
> 98% (+81) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Humble Kingwood (3-4) 1639 |
> 98% (+47) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#3
was #2
Record
7-0
4-0 district
Elo
2816
#3 of 249
OVR Grade
96.5
#3 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
89.7
#13 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
102.1
#1 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2820
#4 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 17-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Galena Park North Shore’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2018
16-0
Rating 952 (100th)
#2 · 2021
15-1
Rating 895 (100th)
#3 · 2019
15-1
Rating 892 (100th)
#4 · 2020
14-1
Rating 873 (100th)
#5 · 2025
14-2
Rating 866 (100th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.