← Back

CLASS 6A · District 13-6A

Conroe Oak Ridge War Eagles

Enrollment: 2,760 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#179

was #179

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1217

#179 of 249

OVR Grade

72.3

#179 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Katy Taylor (0-0) 1011	70% (+8)	—	—	—	—
2	@Klein Cain (0-0) 1785	8% (-23)	—	—	—	—
3	@Montgomery	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—
5	@Cleveland (0-0) 382	97% (+33)	—	—	—	—
6	Conroe (0-0) 1483	25% (-11)	—	—	—	—
7	@Conroe Grand Oaks (0-0) 1830	7% (-25)	—	—	—	—
8	@#20Willis (0-0) 2169	< 2% (-38)	—	—	—	—
9	Conroe Caney Creek (0-0) 712	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
10	@#25The Woodlands College Park (0-0) 2150	< 2% (-37)	—	—	—	—
11	#43The Woodlands (0-0) 1934	5% (-29)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 13-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		20	Willis (7) Wildkats	86.7 2169	0-0	0-0	—	—	6-1	> 98%	D2
2		25	The Woodlands College Park (5) Cavaliers	86.4 2150	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.9-1.1	> 98%	D2
3		43	The Woodlands (2) Highlanders	83.2 1934	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-2	94.5%	D1
4		57	Conroe Grand Oaks (3) Grizzlies	81.6 1830	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	87.3%	D1
5		117	Conroe (1) Tigers	76.4 1483	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	17.3%	—
6		179	Conroe Oak Ridge (8) War Eagles	72.3 1217	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	2.7%	—
7		238	Conroe Caney Creek (6) Panthers	64.7 712	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		248	Cleveland (4) Indians	59.7 382	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Conroe Oak Ridge’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2023

8-4

Rating 605 (79th)

#2 · 2022

7-4

Rating 582 (72nd)

#3 · 2014

7-4

Rating 572 (70th)

#4 · 2018

5-5

Rating 571 (69th)

#5 · 2010

6-5

Rating 546 (61st)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1386	25.3	36.8	−11.5	1508	−3.3	+6.7	−10.0	1251	−2.26	+0.28	−2.54	480(37th)
2024	3-7	1363	35.4	47.7	−12.3	1519	+4.2	+15.5	−11.3	1217	−3.79	+0.14	−3.93	474(34th)
2023	8-4	1865	36.1	24.2	+11.8	1551	+7.2	−6.0	+13.3	1832	−0.21	+1.71	−1.92	605(79th)
2022	7-4	1677	37.5	23.9	+13.5	1513	+8.6	−5.3	+13.9	1848	−0.60	+1.09	−1.69	582(72nd)
2021	2-8	1369	23.8	34.4	−10.6	1709	−0.2	+0.8	−1.0	1475	−4.89	+0.38	−5.26	501(45th)
2020	6-5	1435	24.1	27.2	−3.1	1504	−3.6	−1.8	−1.9	1454	−2.20	+0.94	−3.13	500(44th)
2019	3-7	1360	23.6	32.8	−9.2	1633	−0.3	+2.9	−3.2	1421	−3.61	+0.25	−3.86	494(42nd)
2018	5-5	1724	35.0	26.4	+8.6	1515	+7.4	−2.4	+9.8	1744	−1.75	+0.65	−2.40	571(69th)
2017	5-4	1585	26.6	27.8	−1.2	1661	+1.8	−4.3	+6.1	1654	−0.36	+0.60	−0.96	546(61st)
2016	4-6	1486	21.5	23.8	−2.3	1678	−5.8	−10.2	+4.4	1611	−2.21	+0.88	−3.09	532(56th)
2015	4-6	1399	31.8	27.3	+4.5	1533	+5.0	−0.3	+5.3	1632	−3.23	+0.65	−3.87	525(54th)
2014	7-4	1710	33.6	27.2	+6.5	1570	+9.0	−1.4	+10.4	1760	−0.07	+1.14	−1.21	572(70th)
2013	7-4	1514	31.4	30.5	+0.9	1574	+3.7	+1.4	+2.3	1558	−0.17	+1.09	−1.26	528(55th)
2012	1-9	1012	13.4	31.7	−18.3	1590	−14.0	+0.5	−14.5	1137	−5.57	+0.21	−5.77	428(21st)
2011	1-9	1107	20.8	40.9	−20.1	1570	−4.5	+11.2	−15.7	1108	−6.08	+0.02	−6.10	435(23rd)
2010	6-5	1617	32.3	29.1	+3.2	1528	+4.7	+1.0	+3.7	1593	−1.59	+0.76	−2.34	546(61st)
2009	5-6	1568	28.9	28.5	+0.4	1567	+4.6	+0.7	+3.9	1597	−2.17	+0.47	−2.64	541(59th)
2008	4-6	1367	24.9	31.8	−6.9	1638	+2.5	+3.3	−0.8	1479	−2.33	+0.37	−2.70	508(47th)
2007	4-6	1152	23.0	32.4	−9.4	1429	−4.3	+8.4	−12.7	1184	−3.55	+0.27	−3.81	451(28th)
2006	7-4	1448	24.2	19.7	+4.5	1453	−2.8	−5.6	+2.8	1570	−1.37	+0.95	−2.32	530(55th)
2005	1-9	959	12.3	34.7	−22.4	1569	−10.3	+9.7	−20.0	1001	−6.19	+0.04	−6.23	410(17th)
2004	2-8	1093	11.7	27.4	−15.7	1513	−13.5	+0.8	−14.3	1143	−5.54	+0.08	−5.62	443(26th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.