← Back
CLASS 6A · District 13-6A

The Woodlands Highlanders

Enrollment: 4,479 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#43
was #43
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1934
#43 of 249
OVR Grade
83.2
#43 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
#32Bridgeland (0-0) 2023
41% (-4)
2
@#37Klein Oak (0-0) 1959
47% (-1)
3
@Humble (0-0) 1449
88% (+19)
5 > 98% (+49)
6 29% (-9)
7
#20Willis (0-0) 2169
27% (-9)
8
Cleveland (0-0) 382
> 98% (+62)
9
@Conroe (0-0) 1483
87% (+18)
10 61% (+4)
11
@Conroe Oak Ridge (0-0) 1217
95% (+29)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 13-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 20
Wildkats
86.7
2169
0-0 0-0 6-1 > 98% D2
2 25
Cavaliers
86.4
2150
0-0 0-0 5.9-1.1 > 98% D2
3 43
Highlanders
83.2
1934
0-0 0-0 5-2 94.5% D1
4 57
Grizzlies
81.6
1830
0-0 0-0 4.5-2.5 87.3% D1
5 117
Tigers
76.4
1483
0-0 0-0 3.1-3.9 17.3%
6 179
War Eagles
72.3
1217
0-0 0-0 2.3-4.7 2.7%
7 238
Panthers
64.7
712
0-0 0-0 1-6 < 2%
8 248
Indians
59.7
382
0-0 0-0 0.2-6.8 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how The Woodlands’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
15-1
Rating 812 (99th)
#2 · 2022
10-3
Rating 728 (96th)
#3 · 2017
7-2
Rating 725 (96th)
#4 · 2011
11-2
Rating 715 (95th)
#5 · 2015
10-2
Rating 714 (95th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 9-3 2010 39.8 16.1 +23.7 1552 +12.6 −13.4 +25.9 2148 +0.96 +1.66 −0.70 671(90th)
2024 11-2 2212 46.2 18.9 +27.3 1584 +15.9 −12.9 +28.8 2221 +2.53 +2.85 −0.32 684(92nd)
2023 9-4 2097 43.8 24.3 +19.5 1765 +19.1 −10.6 +29.8 2244 +1.60 +2.37 −0.77 685(92nd)
2022 10-3 2239 44.8 16.2 +28.7 1717 +20.2 −17.1 +37.3 2432 +2.13 +2.69 −0.57 728(96th)
2021 8-3 1965 40.1 23.7 +16.4 1755 +15.8 −9.0 +24.9 2122 +1.43 +1.76 −0.33 644(86th)
2020 5-4 1749 31.6 25.3 +6.2 1626 +8.1 −4.9 +13.0 1825 −1.17 +1.02 −2.19 578(71st)
2019 8-5 1884 23.3 17.5 +5.8 1712 +0.3 −14.4 +14.7 1868 +0.23 +2.08 −1.85 608(80th)
2018 9-4 2233 36.4 18.2 +18.2 1752 +12.4 −15.3 +27.7 2191 +1.97 +2.38 −0.41 692(93rd)
2017 7-2 2332 42.0 16.2 +25.8 1763 +19.6 −17.0 +36.6 2414 +1.92 +2.37 −0.45 725(96th)
2016 15-1 2673 43.6 18.2 +25.4 1966 +22.7 −20.7 +43.4 2584 +8.23 +8.24 −0.01 812(99th)
2015 10-2 2187 26.9 9.1 +17.8 1823 +6.8 −24.0 +30.8 2269 +3.42 +3.63 −0.20 714(95th)
2014 9-2 2144 30.9 12.8 +18.1 1763 +9.7 −20.4 +30.1 2252 +2.30 +3.18 −0.89 695(93rd)
2013 10-3 2243 29.2 19.0 +10.2 1875 +8.3 −16.3 +24.6 2115 +2.89 +3.02 −0.13 683(92nd)
2012 8-4 2146 39.1 28.1 +11.0 1757 +15.4 −3.8 +19.2 1980 +1.64 +2.61 −0.97 656(89th)
2011 11-2 2286 33.5 12.7 +20.8 1732 +10.3 −19.6 +29.9 2248 +3.89 +4.25 −0.36 715(95th)
2010 9-1 2196 38.4 21.2 +17.2 1609 +12.6 −8.7 +21.4 2034 +2.91 +3.20 −0.29 657(89th)
2009 11-1 2213 34.9 17.8 +17.1 1598 +12.1 −11.2 +23.3 2082 +3.51 +3.67 −0.15 667(90th)
2008 9-2 2130 33.2 9.3 +23.9 1663 +11.9 −17.7 +29.6 2240 +2.61 +3.33 −0.71 699(94th)
2007 3-8 1599 21.4 29.9 −8.5 1832 +2.7 −1.9 +4.6 1616 −2.37 +0.26 −2.63 559(65th)
2006 6-5 1935 19.8 14.2 +5.6 1784 +1.2 −16.0 +17.2 1930 +0.56 +1.20 −0.64 639(86th)
2005 7-4 1793 21.9 15.3 +6.6 1736 +2.4 −13.4 +15.9 1897 +0.25 +1.45 −1.20 616(81st)
2004 8-4 1786 33.3 19.4 +13.9 1578 +10.0 −6.5 +16.5 1913 −0.11 +1.84 −1.95 619(82nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.