← Back
CLASS 6A · District 12-6A

Copperas Cove Bulldawgs

Enrollment: 2,307 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#152
was #152
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1365
#152 of 249
OVR Grade
74.6
#152 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Killeen Ellison
57% (+3)
2 39% (-4)
3
Hutto (0-0) 1693
20% (-13)
4 57% (+3)
5
@Temple (0-0) 1744
17% (-15)
6
Bryan (0-0) 1064
78% (+12)
7 87% (+18)
9
#48Waco Midway (0-0) 1907
9% (-22)
10
@#34Killeen Harker Heights (0-0) 1972
7% (-24)
11
Lake Belton (0-0) 1578
29% (-8)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 12-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 34
Knights
83.7
1972
0-0 0-0 5-1 > 98% D2
2 48
Panthers
82.7
1907
0-0 0-0 4.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 68
Wildcats
80.3
1744
0-0 0-0 4-2 93.6% D1
4 99
Broncos
77.8
1578
0-0 0-0 3.2-2.8 78.1% D2
5 152
Bulldawgs
74.6
1365
0-0 0-0 2.3-3.7 27.2%
6 199
Vikings
70
1064
0-0 0-0 1.1-4.9 3%
7 219
Bobcats
67.6
905
0-0 0-0 0.6-5.4 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Copperas Cove’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2008
13-2
Rating 707 (94th)
#2 · 2005
13-1
Rating 695 (93rd)
#3 · 2004
10-2
Rating 649 (87th)
#4 · 2010
9-2
Rating 622 (83rd)
#5 · 2011
10-2
Rating 622 (83rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1336 28.3 33.5 −5.2 1533 +0.2 +2.8 −2.6 1434 −1.54 +0.52 −2.06 500(44th)
2024 3-7 1350 30.2 40.2 −10.0 1395 −2.2 +11.2 −13.4 1165 −5.01 +0.48 −5.50 466(32nd)
2023 2-8 1004 23.8 37.3 −13.5 1353 −10.6 +8.1 −18.7 1034 −6.03 +0.31 −6.34 420(20th)
2022 2-8 1126 20.3 40.4 −20.1 1576 −6.6 +9.5 −16.1 1097 −5.06 +0.13 −5.19 433(23rd)
2021 1-9 1081 24.5 54.7 −30.2 1603 −1.5 +22.9 −24.4 889 −5.98 +0.12 −6.10 397(14th)
2020 1-7 1096 17.6 36.6 −19.0 1618 −8.9 +5.2 −14.0 1149 −4.63 +0.05 −4.68 429(22nd)
2019 3-7 1465 29.2 36.5 −7.3 1498 +0.3 +7.9 −7.5 1311 −4.29 +0.33 −4.62 489(40th)
2018 7-4 1856 33.4 30.6 +2.7 1671 +7.6 −2.2 +9.8 1744 +0.22 +1.80 −1.57 582(73rd)
2017 5-6 1590 27.1 29.7 −2.6 1739 +3.4 −2.0 +5.4 1636 −1.16 +1.29 −2.46 546(61st)
2016 4-5 1395 26.0 26.8 −0.8 1629 −2.3 −3.8 +1.6 1539 −2.23 +0.77 −3.00 514(49th)
2015 3-8 1501 30.3 43.5 −13.3 1844 +7.8 +8.0 −0.2 1496 −3.16 +0.42 −3.58 528(55th)
2014 7-4 1839 37.1 33.5 +3.5 1758 +14.0 −1.0 +15.0 1874 +0.64 +1.85 −1.21 603(78th)
2013 6-5 1643 44.4 36.2 +8.2 1609 +13.9 +2.9 +11.0 1776 −1.66 +0.54 −2.19 569(68th)
2012 7-4 1852 39.6 20.0 +19.6 1589 +10.6 −10.3 +20.9 2023 −0.67 +1.24 −1.90 621(83rd)
2011 10-2 1911 44.2 24.2 +20.0 1577 +16.8 −2.0 +18.9 1972 +1.77 +2.59 −0.82 622(83rd)
2010 9-2 1851 38.0 17.5 +20.5 1535 +8.8 −10.4 +19.1 1978 +1.29 +1.95 −0.67 622(83rd)
2009 8-3 1766 31.8 19.5 +12.3 1482 +4.0 −8.3 +12.3 1808 −0.50 +1.41 −1.91 587(74th)
2008 13-2 2258 37.5 15.3 +22.2 1583 +11.5 −14.8 +26.3 2157 +3.19 +4.09 −0.91 707(94th)
2007 4-0 2151 47.0 8.8 +38.2 1276 +17.0 −11.5 +28.6 2214 +0.69 +0.69 0.00
2006 3-1 2133 26.8 10.8 +16.0 1501 +4.2 −10.8 +15.1 1876 −0.32 +0.42 −0.74
2005 13-1 2211 36.6 17.0 +19.6 1643 +15.1 −10.0 +25.1 2129 +3.98 +4.06 −0.08 695(93rd)
2004 10-2 1890 32.4 15.6 +16.8 1579 +9.6 −10.4 +20.0 2000 +1.15 +2.23 −1.07 649(87th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.