← Back
CLASS 6A · District 12-6A

Waco Midway Panthers

Enrollment: 2,647 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1
Rank
#48
was #48
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1907
#48 of 249
OVR Grade
82.7
#48 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Leander Rouse (0-0) 1250
94% (+26)
2
@#22Aledo (0-0) 2165
25% (-10)
3
#49Cedar Park (0-0) 1896
51% (+0)
4
@Belton
96% (+30)
5
@Lake Belton (0-0) 1578
80% (+13)
6
Temple (0-0) 1744
66% (+6)
7
@Bryan (0-0) 1064
97% (+34)
8 > 98% (+40)
9
@Copperas Cove (0-0) 1365
91% (+22)
11 43% (-3)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 12-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 34
Knights
83.7
1972
0-0 0-0 5-1 > 98% D2
2 48
Panthers
82.7
1907
0-0 0-0 4.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 68
Wildcats
80.3
1744
0-0 0-0 4-2 93.6% D1
4 99
Broncos
77.8
1578
0-0 0-0 3.2-2.8 78.1% D2
5 152
Bulldawgs
74.6
1365
0-0 0-0 2.3-3.7 27.2%
6 199
Vikings
70
1064
0-0 0-0 1.1-4.9 3%
7 219
Bobcats
67.6
905
0-0 0-0 0.6-5.4 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Waco Midway’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017
14-1
Rating 772 (98th)
#2 · 2018
11-2
Rating 704 (94th)
#3 · 2014
11-1
Rating 697 (94th)
#4 · 2012
13-1
Rating 675 (91st)
#5 · 2015
9-4
Rating 672 (91st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 9-2 1936 43.7 27.3 +16.5 1498 +14.8 −3.1 +17.8 1946 +0.58 +1.31 −0.72 622(83rd)
2024 7-4 1452 30.8 22.4 +8.5 1465 −2.0 −8.2 +6.2 1655 −1.39 +0.97 −2.36 540(59th)
2023 5-6 1719 31.5 29.6 +1.8 1606 +2.7 −3.6 +6.2 1656 −2.35 +1.04 −3.39 568(68th)
2022 2-8 1283 19.5 39.4 −19.9 1788 −2.9 +3.7 −6.6 1334 −3.43 +0.46 −3.89 485(38th)
2021 1-9 1406 21.7 46.5 −24.8 1912 +1.2 +10.0 −8.8 1279 −3.60 +0.04 −3.64 497(43rd)
2020 2-7 1763 22.8 43.8 −21.0 2030 +6.7 +5.9 +0.8 1519 −2.16 +0.18 −2.34 560(65th)
2019 9-4 2133 33.5 19.8 +13.6 1650 +7.1 −11.7 +18.8 1970 +0.87 +2.45 −1.58 648(87th)
2018 11-2 2386 39.9 23.4 +16.5 1762 +16.1 −10.5 +26.6 2166 +4.07 +4.29 −0.23 704(94th)
2017 14-1 2486 45.7 23.1 +22.7 1866 +24.8 −11.2 +35.9 2399 +6.73 +6.79 −0.06 772(98th)
2016 8-3 2053 34.2 30.5 +3.7 1776 +11.1 −4.6 +15.7 1892 +1.50 +2.14 −0.64 625(83rd)
2015 9-4 2164 42.5 30.5 +12.1 1799 +20.4 −3.9 +24.3 2108 +1.27 +2.28 −1.01 672(91st)
2014 11-1 2275 46.8 25.2 +21.7 1703 +22.1 −9.4 +31.5 2288 +3.77 +3.94 −0.17 697(94th)
2013 9-3 2046 43.2 25.4 +17.8 1469 +11.5 −5.5 +17.0 1924 −0.08 +1.52 −1.60 637(85th)
2012 13-1 2198 40.9 22.4 +18.5 1634 +14.9 −9.2 +24.1 2103 +4.72 +4.90 −0.18 675(91st)
2011 3-1 1854 31.0 22.2 +8.8 1514 +4.8 −4.9 +9.8 1744 −0.08 +0.56 −0.64
2010 4-0 1933 37.5 10.0 +27.5 1513 +9.7 −18.2 +27.9 2198 +1.04 +1.04 0.00
2009 1-0 1600 38.0 10.0 +28.0 1190 +6.3 −13.0 +19.3 1982 +0.07 +0.07 0.00
2008 1-0 1560 38.0 0.0 +38.0 1246 +6.0 −26.6 +32.7 2316 +0.10 +0.10 0.00
2007 1-0 1478 21.0 17.0 +4.0 1993 +6.8 −12.1 +18.9 1972 +0.78 +0.78 0.00
2006 0-1 1290 17.0 38.0 −21.0 2174 −0.1 +0.9 −1.0 1474 −0.63 0.00 −0.63
2005 1-1 1308 19.0 26.5 −7.5 1588 −3.8 +2.6 −6.3 1342 −0.47 +0.14 −0.60
2004 1-1 1286 18.0 18.0 0.0 1496 −5.2 −4.2 −1.1 1473 −0.60 +0.21 −0.81
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.