| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgetown East View (2-4) 1209 |
78% (+12) | W 21-6 | 1610 | −12.6 | −17.0 | +0.06 | — |
| 2 | @Copperas Cove (5-2) 1566 |
56% (+2) | W 42-35 | 1775 | +9.6 | −1.4 | +0.16 | — |
| 3 | Cedar Park Vista Ridge (2-5) 1360 |
51% (+1) | W 70-23 | 2360 | +25.8 | −8.6 | +0.23 | — |
| 4 | Leander Rouse (4-3) 1600 |
63% (+5) | W 34-16 | 2186 | +11.5 | −15.9 | +0.24 | — |
| 5 | @Round Rock Westwood (1-6) 1059 |
93% (+25) | W 43-0 | 2117 | +7.8 | −16.8 | +0.05 | — |
| 6 | Round Rock McNeil (0-7) 1099 |
92% (+24) | W 77-29 | 2025 | +27.1 | +6.1 | +0.06 | — |
| 7 | 22% (-12) | W 35-34 | 2138 | +15.1 | −10.4 | +0.74 | — | |
| 9 | Round Rock Stony Point (3-4) 1335 |
90% (+21) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | 12% (-19) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 11 | #42Round Rock (4-2) 2019 |
33% (-7) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#61
was #64
Record
7-0
3-0 district
Elo
1852
#61 of 249
OVR Grade
81.9
#61 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
83.5
#48 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
82.8
#54 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2030
#50 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 25-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Round Rock Cedar Ridge’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2016
11-1
Rating 722 (96th)
#2 · 2017
12-2
Rating 718 (95th)
#3 · 2015
10-2
Rating 681 (92nd)
#4 · 2018
9-3
Rating 654 (88th)
#5 · 2020
6-4
Rating 598 (77th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.