← Back
CLASS 6A · District 6-6A

Dallas Jesuit Rangers

Enrollment: 2,320 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8
Rank
#91
was #98
Record
4-2
3-0 district
Elo
1660
#91 of 249
OVR Grade
79
#91 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
81.1
#68 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
77.7
#97 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1795
#78 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785
 48% (-1) L 24-52 1180 +0.7 +13.5 — −0.79
2
#38Rockwall (4-2) 2040
 13% (-18) L 28-51 1465 −4.9 −3.5 — −0.49
3
Forney (2-4) 1531
 32% (-7) W 31-14 2059 +5.5 −16.9 +0.23 —
4
@Princeton (2-4) 1089
 78% (+12) W 45-0 2275 +11.6 −19.4 +0.07 —
5
McKinney Boyd (2-4) 1298
 80% (+13) W 35-28 1554 +8.5 +6.4 +0.07 —
7
@#31Prosper Walnut Grove (5-1) 2078
 10% (-21) W 50-49 2237 +30.5 +1.0 +0.77 —
8
#11Prosper (5-1) 2389
 5% (-29) — — — — — —
9
@#2Allen (6-0) 2857
 < 2% (-48) — — — — — —
10
McKinney (1-5) 1457
 70% (+8) — — — — — —
11
@Prosper Rock Hill (3-3) 1541
 62% (+5) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 6-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 2
Eagles
97.1
2857
 6-0 3-0 53.0 13.2 7-0 > 98% D1
2 11
Eagles
90
2389
 5-1 2-1 50.3 34.8 5.7-1.3 > 98% D1
3 91
Rangers
79
1660
 4-2 3-0 35.5 32.3 4.4-2.6 85.5% D2
4 31
Wildcats
85.3
2078
 5-1 2-1 46.2 24.2 4.2-2.8 > 98% D2
5 111
Blue Hawks
77.2
1541
 3-3 1-2 19.5 31.2 2.9-4.2 10.2% —
6 130
Lions
76
1457
 1-5 0-3 23.2 45.3 2.2-4.8 5.3% —
7 163
Broncos
73.6
1298
 2-4 1-2 21.7 24.5 1.4-5.6 < 2% —
8 194
Panthers
70.4
1089
 2-4 0-3 19.3 32.7 0.3-6.7 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Dallas Jesuit’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019
9-5
Rating 676 (91st)
#2 · 2015
10-2
Rating 653 (88th)
#3 · 2012
8-3
Rating 636 (85th)
#4 · 2016
8-4
Rating 612 (81st)
#5 · 2021
10-2
Rating 611 (80th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-6 1598 29.5 28.2 +1.2 1355 +0.9 +2.3 −1.4 1466 −2.98 +0.40 −3.38 539(58th)
2024 6-5 1529 34.4 31.1 +3.3 1340 +3.5 +6.0 −2.5 1437 −2.88 +0.33 −3.22 518(51st)
2023 8-4 1760 33.7 23.9 +9.7 1388 +2.3 −3.7 +6.0 1649 −0.68 +1.42 −2.10 577(71st)
2022 9-3 1829 34.9 23.7 +11.2 1444 +5.2 −4.2 +9.4 1736 +0.59 +1.31 −0.72 592(76th)
2021 10-2 1970 39.8 26.3 +13.4 1474 +9.7 −2.9 +12.6 1815 +1.79 +1.95 −0.16 611(80th)
2020 7-4 1795 44.5 23.5 +20.9 1378 +12.5 −3.7 +16.2 1906 −1.26 +0.29 −1.55 592(76th)
2019 9-5 2123 33.0 27.2 +5.8 1861 +13.7 −7.9 +21.6 2040 +2.34 +3.64 −1.31 676(91st)
2018 2-8 1402 26.7 32.1 −5.4 1787 +1.8 −3.0 +4.8 1620 −3.77 +0.10 −3.87 532(56th)
2017 7-5 1835 46.6 41.5 +5.1 1630 +17.5 +8.4 +9.1 1728 −0.44 +0.69 −1.13 582(72nd)
2016 8-4 1970 40.5 30.5 +10.0 1667 +13.4 −2.1 +15.5 1887 +0.42 +1.44 −1.02 612(81st)
2015 10-2 1953 40.5 15.9 +24.6 1485 +10.9 −12.0 +22.8 2071 +1.45 +2.48 −1.03 653(88th)
2014 8-4 1681 46.4 36.1 +10.3 1420 +14.5 +6.4 +8.1 1703 −0.87 +0.62 −1.49 573(70th)
2013 9-3 1948 39.7 29.5 +10.2 1467 +9.6 −0.3 +9.9 1747 +0.62 +1.64 −1.02 604(79th)
2012 8-3 1887 44.1 20.4 +23.7 1435 +12.9 −8.0 +20.9 2023 +0.34 +1.28 −0.94 636(85th)
2011 8-3 1710 41.3 30.5 +10.7 1432 +12.3 +3.4 +9.0 1724 +0.28 +1.28 −1.00 571(69th)
2010 6-5 1637 36.5 28.4 +8.2 1530 +9.7 +0.4 +9.2 1731 −1.45 +0.66 −2.12 566(67th)
2009 4-6 1627 26.1 34.3 −8.2 1843 +4.2 −0.8 +5.0 1624 −1.01 +1.53 −2.54 561(66th)
2008 3-7 1533 24.1 38.2 −14.1 1877 +2.2 +2.4 −0.2 1494 −2.40 +0.39 −2.79 540(59th)
2007 6-5 1609 25.3 20.2 +5.1 1609 +1.8 −7.5 +9.3 1732 −1.36 +1.06 −2.42 566(67th)
2006 5-6 1521 22.0 24.4 −2.4 1677 +0.5 −4.3 +4.8 1619 −1.30 +0.87 −2.17 543(59th)
2005 4-6 1336 24.6 32.5 −7.9 1457 −2.1 +6.7 −8.9 1279 −4.02 +0.23 −4.24 481(37th)
2004 10-2 1766 30.2 22.3 +7.8 1458 +5.3 −1.7 +7.0 1675 +0.65 +1.70 −1.05 578(71st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.