← Back
CLASS 6A · District 6-6A

Prosper Eagles

Enrollment: 2,609 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#24
was #24
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2154
#24 of 249
OVR Grade
86.5
#24 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@#46Rockwall (0-0) 1908
74% (+10)
2
@#8North Forney (0-0) 2478
20% (-13)
3
#15Austin Westlake (0-0) 2295
36% (-6)
4
#6Allen (0-0) 2516
18% (-14)
5
@McKinney (0-0) 1488
94% (+27)
7 95% (+28)
8
@Dallas Jesuit (0-0) 1511
94% (+26)
9
McKinney Boyd (0-0) 1305
97% (+34)
10
@#50Prosper Walnut Grove (0-0) 1890
75% (+11)
11
Princeton (0-0) 1131
> 98% (+41)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 6-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 6
Eagles
91.9
2516
0-0 0-0 6.7-0.3 > 98% D1
2 24
Eagles
86.5
2154
0-0 0-0 5.7-1.3 > 98% D1
3 50
Wildcats
82.5
1890
0-0 0-0 4.7-2.3 94.8% D2
4 111
Rangers
76.8
1511
0-0 0-0 2.9-4.1 41.9% D2
5 116
Lions
76.4
1488
0-0 0-0 2.7-4.3 30.4%
6 132
Blue Hawks
75.9
1453
0-0 0-0 2.5-4.4 23.7%
7 165
Broncos
73.7
1305
0-0 0-0 1.8-5.2 7.8%
8 193
Panthers
71
1131
0-0 0-0 0.9-6.1 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Prosper’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022
13-2
Rating 750 (97th)
#2 · 2025
11-2
Rating 727 (96th)
#3 · 2021
9-5
Rating 716 (95th)
#4 · 2020
8-4
Rating 686 (92nd)
#5 · 2023
11-2
Rating 675 (91st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 11-2 2370 51.1 24.2 +26.9 1739 +27.9 −9.3 +37.2 2430 +3.17 +3.26 −0.09 727(96th)
2024 8-3 2068 41.4 21.1 +20.3 1685 +16.3 −12.3 +28.5 2213 +1.27 +1.52 −0.25 670(90th)
2023 11-2 2112 37.4 23.2 +14.2 1762 +11.8 −13.2 +25.0 2125 +3.24 +3.86 −0.62 675(91st)
2022 13-2 2453 34.0 16.8 +17.2 1899 +12.3 −20.7 +33.0 2326 +6.05 +6.13 −0.07 750(97th)
2021 9-5 2179 32.9 22.3 +10.6 1984 +12.3 −18.0 +30.3 2258 +2.98 +4.34 −1.36 716(95th)
2020 8-4 2191 28.1 23.0 +5.1 1935 +6.8 −15.8 +22.6 2065 +2.91 +3.96 −1.04 686(92nd)
2019 11-3 2087 37.6 19.6 +18.0 1709 +13.9 −12.8 +26.7 2167 +2.17 +3.03 −0.86 674(91st)
2018 9-3 1914 37.8 27.2 +10.6 1656 +12.8 −5.4 +18.2 1955 +1.40 +1.90 −0.50 616(81st)
2015 1-0 1555 29.0 14.0 +15.0 1286 −1.6 −9.5 +7.9 1697 +0.51 +0.51 0.00
2014 0-2 1315 9.5 48.0 −38.5 1879 −11.8 +8.7 −20.5 986 −1.17 0.00 −1.17
2012 1-0 1369 39.0 21.0 +18.0 1343 +12.7 +0.4 +12.4 1809 +0.05 +0.05 0.00
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.