← Back

CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

Garland Lakeview Centennial Patriots

Enrollment: 2,080 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#112

was #112

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1510

#112 of 249

OVR Grade

76.8

#112 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	96% (+30)	—	—	—	—
2	Red Oak (0-0) 1605	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
3	@McKinney North	71% (+8)	—	—	—	—
4	@Garland (0-0) 1259	74% (+10)	—	—	—	—
5	Wylie (0-0) 1328	68% (+7)	—	—	—	—
7	@Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
8	South Garland (0-0) 506	> 98% (+40)	—	—	—	—
9	@Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529	48% (-1)	—	—	—	—
10	@North Garland (0-0) 1096	85% (+17)	—	—	—	—
11	Wylie East (0-0) 1679	33% (-7)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		82	Wylie East (4) Raiders	79.3 1679	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-1.5	94.9%	D1
2		102	Garland Rowlett (7) Eagles	77.1 1534	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	83.1%	D2
3		103	Garland Sachse (3) Mustangs	77 1529	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.7-2.3	82%	D1
4		112	Garland Lakeview Centennial (6) Patriots	76.8 1510	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	78.5%	D2
5		162	Wylie (1) Pirates	74 1328	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.4-3.6	34.4%	—
6		172	Garland (5) Owls	73 1259	0-0	0-0	—	—	3-4	22.4%	—
7		197	North Garland (2) Raiders	70.5 1096	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	4.7%	—
8		246	South Garland (8) Titans	61.6 506	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Garland Lakeview Centennial’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016

8-4

Rating 549 (62nd)

#2 · 2018

5-4

Rating 519 (52nd)

#3 · 2005

3-7

Rating 511 (49th)

#4 · 2015

5-5

Rating 511 (48th)

#5 · 2012

5-5

Rating 508 (48th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	3-7	977	22.0	21.3	+0.7	1250	−9.6	+1.2	−10.8	1230	−5.67	+0.15	−5.82	440(24th)
2024	3-7	1175	18.8	29.3	−10.5	1362	−11.2	+5.8	−17.1	1074	−4.95	+0.07	−5.03	438(24th)
2023	6-4	1384	28.9	26.5	+2.4	1286	−2.8	+2.7	−5.5	1363	−2.75	+0.28	−3.04	499(44th)
2022	5-5	1369	25.1	23.2	+1.9	1285	−6.5	+0.3	−6.8	1329	−3.43	+0.55	−3.98	485(39th)
2021	5-5	1246	25.6	24.8	+0.8	1252	−9.4	0.0	−9.4	1265	−3.79	+0.28	−4.07	462(31st)
2020	4-1	1579	36.8	20.2	+16.6	1236	+4.0	−1.1	+5.1	1627	−0.39	+0.50	−0.89	—
2019	6-5	1378	28.5	22.3	+6.2	1311	−3.0	−1.1	−1.9	1453	−3.13	+0.47	−3.60	500(44th)
2018	5-4	1450	31.1	20.8	+10.3	1277	+0.7	−1.2	+1.9	1546	−2.55	+0.40	−2.95	519(52nd)
2017	4-7	1317	30.6	38.7	−8.1	1414	−0.6	+11.4	−11.9	1202	−4.43	+0.16	−4.59	462(31st)
2016	8-4	1600	40.3	31.6	+8.8	1392	+10.1	+6.2	+3.9	1597	−1.18	+0.90	−2.07	549(62nd)
2015	5-5	1383	35.7	33.0	+2.7	1453	+2.4	+1.2	+1.2	1531	−2.78	+0.32	−3.10	511(48th)
2014	4-6	1304	29.9	30.1	−0.2	1407	−4.6	−0.7	−3.9	1403	−3.54	+0.24	−3.78	487(39th)
2013	3-6	1143	31.3	36.7	−5.3	1381	+1.0	+11.5	−10.4	1240	−4.47	+0.13	−4.60	452(28th)
2012	5-5	1285	29.7	22.6	+7.1	1404	−1.2	−3.5	+2.3	1557	−2.87	+1.17	−4.04	508(48th)
2011	2-7	1098	8.4	36.3	−27.9	1575	−17.2	+6.9	−24.1	898	−4.20	+0.08	−4.28	406(16th)
2010	1-8	1089	14.1	32.6	−18.4	1645	−7.8	+4.6	−12.5	1188	−5.37	+0.05	−5.42	444(26th)
2009	3-7	1156	17.2	29.6	−12.4	1512	−7.7	+4.5	−12.2	1195	−4.41	+0.24	−4.65	450(28th)
2008	3-7	1202	15.7	23.2	−7.5	1513	−10.6	−3.0	−7.6	1311	−4.25	+0.23	−4.48	471(33rd)
2007	5-5	1317	22.8	29.3	−6.5	1417	−4.4	+4.0	−8.4	1289	−2.36	+0.90	−3.26	480(36th)
2006	1-9	961	22.8	33.3	−10.5	1435	−6.1	+7.1	−13.2	1170	−6.99	+0.04	−7.03	432(23rd)
2005	3-7	1379	18.5	28.5	−10.0	1726	−0.9	+0.3	−1.2	1471	−3.42	+0.30	−3.71	511(49th)
2004	3-7	1262	16.3	28.8	−12.5	1582	−6.7	+2.2	−8.9	1277	−4.49	+0.29	−4.79	477(35th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.