← Back
CLASS 6A · District 9-6A

North Garland Raiders

Enrollment: 2,903 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#229
was #225
Record
1-5
1-2 district
Elo
760
#229 of 249
OVR Grade
65.4
#229 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
58.2
#243 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
54.3
#242 of 249 in 6A
Perf
295
#243 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
@Princeton (2-4) 1089
 46% (-1) L 7-49 100 −26.4 +29.6 — −0.95
2
@Grand Prairie (3-3) 962
 71% (+9) L 0-33 -57 −37.1 +25.2 — −0.99
3
Denton
 12% (-19) L 6-49 210 −26.3 +25.3 — −0.92
4
Wylie East (4-2) 1720
 3% (-32) L 0-62 327 −24.9 +22.1 — −0.78
5
@South Garland (2-4) 442
 74% (+10) W 53-32 783 −0.2 +28.4 +0.00 —
7
@Garland (2-4) 1176
 19% (-14) L 10-32 407 −28.3 +15.5 — −0.95
8
Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785
 < 2% (-41) — — — — — —
9
@Wylie (4-2) 1571
 3% (-32) — — — — — —
10
Garland Lakeview Centennial (2-4) 1348
 8% (-24) — — — — — —
11
Garland Rowlett (3-3) 1384
 7% (-25) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 9-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 69
Mustangs
80.9
1785
 6-0 3-0 43.7 19.5 6.3-0.7 > 98% D1
2 81
Raiders
79.9
1720
 4-2 3-0 44.8 22.2 6.1-0.9 > 98% D2
3 103
Pirates
77.7
1571
 4-2 1-2 43.3 30.8 4.5-2.5 95.7% D1
4 146
Eagles
74.8
1384
 3-3 2-1 31.8 26.2 4.2-2.9 89.4% D2
5 155
Patriots
74.3
1348
 2-4 1-2 25.3 28.0 3.2-3.8 9.6% —
6 181
Owls
71.7
1176
 2-4 1-2 17.7 36.8 2.5-4.5 6.1% —
7 229
Raiders
65.4
760
 1-5 1-2 12.7 42.8 1.2-5.8 < 2% —
8 245
Titans
60.6
442
 2-4 0-3 15.0 42.0 0.1-6.9 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how North Garland’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004
7-4
Rating 571 (69th)
#2 · 2005
4-6
Rating 558 (65th)
#3 · 2009
6-5
Rating 558 (65th)
#4 · 2006
5-5
Rating 547 (61st)
#5 · 2019
6-4
Rating 497 (43rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-8 956 18.1 31.9 −13.8 1248 −13.2 +10.4 −23.6 909 −6.48 +0.10 −6.58 396(14th)
2024 0-10 739 15.9 45.6 −29.7 1413 −13.0 +21.2 −34.2 645 −7.99 0.00 −7.99 341(6th)
2023 2-8 1063 21.3 38.8 −17.5 1296 −10.5 +14.8 −25.4 866 −6.47 +0.05 −6.52 404(15th)
2022 3-7 1119 32.4 37.1 −4.7 1305 +1.3 +14.4 −13.1 1173 −5.46 +0.32 −5.78 442(25th)
2021 6-5 1213 27.5 30.4 −2.9 1281 −7.0 +5.3 −12.4 1191 −2.64 +0.32 −2.97 449(27th)
2020 1-5 885 11.2 34.3 −23.2 1181 −21.3 +13.0 −34.3 644 −4.11 +0.01 −4.12 —
2019 6-4 1276 36.9 22.2 +14.7 1168 +1.9 +2.1 −0.2 1495 −2.80 +0.21 −3.01 497(43rd)
2018 6-4 1283 23.2 16.4 +6.8 1225 −9.2 −5.1 −4.1 1398 −2.34 +0.34 −2.68 491(41st)
2017 3-7 1058 24.3 35.2 −10.9 1315 −7.8 +11.0 −18.8 1030 −5.20 +0.10 −5.30 415(18th)
2016 2-8 846 8.9 22.2 −13.3 1371 −21.7 −2.6 −19.1 1022 −5.92 +0.16 −6.08 396(14th)
2015 3-6 931 19.1 33.7 −14.6 1504 −14.3 +0.4 −14.6 1134 −3.45 +0.11 −3.56 417(19th)
2014 0-10 573 11.8 38.8 −27.0 1469 −21.6 +6.8 −28.4 791 −7.50 0.00 −7.50 340(6th)
2013 0-10 612 6.8 38.6 −31.8 1367 −24.0 +13.7 −37.7 556 −8.35 0.00 −8.35 313(4th)
2012 1-9 810 15.5 42.4 −26.9 1389 −15.9 +15.1 −31.0 725 −6.95 +0.03 −6.97 354(8th)
2011 0-9 907 8.6 43.7 −35.1 1609 −15.8 +14.1 −30.0 750 −6.31 0.00 −6.31 369(9th)
2010 1-9 1211 12.0 27.0 −15.0 1583 −11.2 −1.0 −10.3 1243 −6.32 +0.10 −6.42 463(31st)
2009 6-5 1585 22.2 15.7 +6.5 1485 −2.5 −8.8 +6.3 1658 −2.15 +1.04 −3.20 558(65th)
2008 5-5 1360 22.9 27.3 −4.4 1393 −5.4 +2.5 −7.9 1302 −2.83 +0.26 −3.09 484(38th)
2007 1-9 1262 17.5 30.9 −13.4 1589 −6.5 +1.8 −8.2 1294 −6.52 +0.05 −6.57 476(35th)
2006 5-5 1573 33.0 29.0 +4.0 1499 +6.8 +2.0 +4.8 1620 −1.87 +0.83 −2.70 547(61st)
2005 4-6 1519 23.5 17.9 +5.6 1566 +1.0 −7.5 +8.5 1712 −3.41 +0.37 −3.77 558(65th)
2004 7-4 1668 27.6 21.6 +6.0 1557 +4.7 −3.6 +8.2 1706 −0.90 +0.93 −1.83 571(69th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.