| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richardson (1-5) 1192 |
62% (+5) | W 31-20 | 1336 | −7.9 | −1.4 | +0.23 | — |
| 2 | @Texarkana Texas High |
46% (-2) | L 41-44 | 1753 | +19.6 | +9.4 | — | −0.57 |
| 3 | Royse City (1-5) 1569 |
65% (+6) | L 21-42 | 1086 | −6.3 | +10.2 | — | −0.78 |
| 4 | @North Garland (1-5) 760 |
97% (+32) | W 62-0 | 1989 | +13.0 | −6.6 | +0.01 | — |
| 5 | Garland (2-4) 1176 |
83% (+15) | W 72-0 | 2757 | +33.7 | −16.5 | +0.06 | — |
| 7 | @Wylie (4-2) 1571 |
41% (-4) | W 42-27 | 2095 | +11.1 | −12.7 | +0.34 | — |
| 8 | Garland Rowlett (3-3) 1384 |
80% (+13) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @South Garland (2-4) 442 |
> 98% (+51) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Garland Sachse (6-0) 1785 |
43% (-3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Garland Lakeview Centennial (2-4) 1348 |
83% (+15) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#81
was #100
Record
4-2
3-0 district
Elo
1720
#81 of 249
OVR Grade
79.9
#81 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
82.4
#59 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
77.5
#102 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1836
#69 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 9-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Wylie East’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2024
10-2
Rating 651 (88th)
#2 · 2023
10-2
Rating 647 (87th)
#3 · 2025
10-1
Rating 577 (71st)
#4 · 2022
9-2
Rating 569 (68th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.