← Back

CLASS 6A · District 32-6A

PSJA Bears

Enrollment: 2,278 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#215

was #215

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

938

#215 of 249

OVR Grade

68.1

#215 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Mercedes	18% (-14)	—	—	—	—
2	@Sharyland Pioneer	64% (+6)	—	—	—	—
3	McAllen	18% (-14)	—	—	—	—
4	@Donna	91% (+22)	—	—	—	—
5	Weslaco (0-0) 1499	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
7	@Harlingen (0-0) 1406	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
8	@Brownsville Veterans Memorial (0-0) 1478	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
9	Los Fresnos (0-0) 1479	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
10	@PSJA North (0-0) 1658	5% (-29)	—	—	—	—
11	San Benito (0-0) 1261	21% (-13)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 32-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		85	PSJA North (6) Raiders	79 1658	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.9-1.1	97.2%	D2
2		121	Brownsville Veterans Memorial (4) Chargers	76.3 1478	0-0	0-0	—	—	3-2	87.7%	D2
3		120	Los Fresnos (1) Falcons	76.3 1479	0-0	0-0	—	—	3-2	87%	D1
4		144	Harlingen (3) Cardinals	75.2 1406	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.6-2.4	78.6%	D1
5		171	San Benito (2) Greyhounds	73 1261	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-3.1	44.2%	—
6		215	PSJA (5) Bears	68.1 938	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.6-4.4	5.2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how PSJA’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024

9-3

Rating 556 (64th)

#2 · 2005

10-3

Rating 538 (58th)

#3 · 2023

8-4

Rating 524 (54th)

#4 · 2019

6-4

Rating 514 (50th)

#5 · 2018

7-4

Rating 500 (44th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	783	17.2	43.7	−26.5	1233	−16.2	+20.7	−36.9	579	−7.50	+0.00	−7.51	336(6th)
2024	9-3	1551	32.7	17.2	+15.4	1172	+0.5	−4.2	+4.7	1618	−1.16	+0.51	−1.67	556(64th)
2023	8-4	1434	33.7	18.2	+15.5	1031	−3.0	−0.1	−2.9	1429	−2.71	+0.26	−2.98	524(54th)
2022	5-6	1169	26.9	28.1	−1.2	1174	−6.0	+8.8	−14.8	1130	−4.46	+0.11	−4.57	441(25th)
2021	4-6	967	30.4	27.0	+3.4	1159	−2.7	+9.0	−11.6	1209	−4.68	+0.04	−4.72	430(22nd)
2020	1-4	1028	16.6	24.4	−7.8	1158	−15.5	+4.4	−19.9	1002	−3.67	+0.00	−3.67	—
2019	6-4	1444	32.1	24.5	+7.6	1314	+0.6	0.0	+0.6	1516	−2.44	+0.58	−3.02	514(50th)
2018	7-4	1342	34.0	26.5	+7.5	1275	+4.0	+5.0	−1.1	1473	−2.24	+0.64	−2.87	500(44th)
2017	8-3	1115	31.5	26.0	+5.5	1007	−3.5	+10.9	−14.4	1141	−1.91	+0.22	−2.13	436(23rd)
2016	3-7	761	25.8	34.3	−8.5	996	−8.6	+19.6	−28.2	795	−6.31	+0.02	−6.33	357(8th)
2015	0-3	884	10.7	52.7	−42.0	1036	−25.7	+36.0	−61.7	-43	−2.88	0.00	−2.88	—
2014	2-0	1395	19.5	14.0	+5.5	1047	−14.4	−3.7	−10.7	1232	+0.10	+0.10	0.00	—
2013	6-4	1310	21.7	19.1	+2.6	1197	−10.6	−0.8	−9.8	1256	−3.02	+0.50	−3.52	470(33rd)
2012	1-9	842	18.1	39.9	−21.8	1270	−11.7	+18.9	−30.7	734	−7.97	+0.03	−8.00	359(8th)
2011	3-7	1070	21.7	28.5	−6.8	1259	−11.1	+5.2	−16.3	1092	−5.60	+0.17	−5.77	430(22nd)
2010	6-5	1319	25.3	22.6	+2.6	1235	−8.5	−0.8	−7.7	1308	−3.55	+0.38	−3.93	481(37th)
2009	3-7	1211	21.7	25.6	−3.9	1218	−11.5	+2.6	−14.1	1149	−5.35	+0.04	−5.40	449(27th)
2008	6-6	1313	21.0	18.1	+2.9	1236	−10.6	−2.6	−8.1	1299	−4.77	+0.41	−5.17	483(38th)
2007	9-3	1332	25.2	17.7	+7.6	1082	−6.6	+3.3	−10.0	1251	−1.82	+0.66	−2.48	479(36th)
2006	5-6	1159	17.3	25.0	−7.7	1208	−12.7	+6.6	−19.3	1018	−4.91	+0.18	−5.09	430(22nd)
2005	10-3	1535	27.4	16.1	+11.3	1104	−3.4	−0.5	−2.9	1427	−1.45	+0.80	−2.25	538(58th)
2004	5-5	876	26.8	30.7	−3.9	971	−10.5	+14.6	−25.1	872	−4.67	+0.10	−4.77	388(13th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.