← Back

CLASS 6A · District 32-6A

PSJA North Raiders

Enrollment: 2,220 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#67

was #69

Record

5-1

1-0 district

Elo

1798

#67 of 249

OVR Grade

81.1

#67 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

85.1

#39 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

81.1

#66 of 249 in 6A

Perf

2038

#48 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@Laredo United (3-2-1) 1549	60% (+4)	W 46-21	2197	+22.0	−5.9	+0.23	—
2	Mission Veterans Memorial	93% (+25)	W 56-14	2352	+24.0	−10.0	+0.04	—
3	@Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690	70% (+8)	L 40-42	1632	+12.4	+7.1	—	−0.78
4	@Weslaco (3-3) 1417	71% (+9)	W 35-24	1773	+7.4	−3.6	+0.18	—
5	@Edinburg Economedes (2-4) 1062	93% (+25)	W 55-14	1972	+15.7	−3.1	+0.04	—
7	Los Fresnos (3-3) 1360	82% (+14)	W 41-3	2304	+5.0	−27.1	+0.13	—
8	Harlingen (4-2) 1428	82% (+15)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	@San Benito (4-2) 1282	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	PSJA (2-4) 934	97% (+35)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@Brownsville Veterans Memorial (4-2) 1432	82% (+15)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 32-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		67	PSJA North (6) Raiders	81.1 1798	5-1	1-0	45.5	19.7	4.5-0.5	> 98%	D2
2		138	Harlingen (3) Cardinals	75.5 1428	4-2	1-0	31.3	20.7	2.9-2.1	85.9%	D2
3		167	San Benito (2) Greyhounds	73.3 1282	4-2	1-0	20.3	25.7	2.7-2.3	76.9%	D1
4		150	Los Fresnos (1) Falcons	74.5 1360	3-3	0-1	34.0	34.7	2.3-2.7	67.2%	D1
5		136	Brownsville Veterans Memorial (4) Chargers	75.6 1432	4-2	0-1	28.3	29.3	2.1-2.9	66.3%	—
6		211	PSJA (5) Bears	68.1 934	2-4	0-1	18.2	23.5	0.5-4.5	3.7%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how PSJA North’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021

9-3

Rating 608 (79th)

#2 · 2006

11-1

Rating 532 (56th)

#3 · 2009

11-2

Rating 526 (54th)

#4 · 2008

8-4

Rating 507 (47th)

#5 · 2012

5-5

Rating 502 (45th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-0	1789	49.0	8.5	+40.5	963	+9.3	−5.9	+15.2	1879	+0.15	+0.15	0.00	—
2024	2-0	1813	31.5	16.5	+15.0	1360	+2.0	−4.2	+6.2	1655	+0.40	+0.40	0.00	—
2023	3-0	1802	43.3	5.7	+37.7	1242	+13.7	−16.4	+30.0	2251	+0.32	+0.32	0.00	—
2022	3-0	1811	33.3	22.3	+11.0	1337	+3.9	+0.5	+3.5	1586	+0.45	+0.45	0.00	—
2021	9-3	1813	38.2	17.2	+20.9	1324	+9.0	−5.5	+14.4	1861	−0.19	+1.04	−1.23	608(79th)
2020	5-3	1414	24.1	22.4	+1.8	1186	−7.6	+0.7	−8.3	1293	−2.07	+0.32	−2.39	487(39th)
2019	5-5	1254	25.4	21.5	+3.9	1248	−7.7	−1.5	−6.2	1345	−3.72	+0.16	−3.88	475(35th)
2018	7-5	1358	31.0	23.3	+7.7	1208	−0.3	+2.7	−3.0	1425	−3.73	+0.40	−4.13	496(42nd)
2017	2-8	799	14.0	23.2	−9.2	1063	−20.3	+7.5	−27.8	805	−7.32	+0.06	−7.37	363(9th)
2016	7-3	1196	23.7	11.0	+12.7	975	−11.5	−3.3	−8.3	1294	−2.47	+0.19	−2.66	483(38th)
2015	5-6	1235	28.3	32.0	−3.7	1213	−4.5	+10.3	−14.8	1130	−4.70	+0.27	−4.97	444(26th)
2014	4-6	1197	31.1	26.8	+4.3	1223	−0.9	+6.5	−7.4	1316	−4.97	+0.32	−5.29	467(32nd)
2013	0-10	801	10.5	34.7	−24.2	1278	−20.3	+14.2	−34.5	637	−8.98	0.00	−8.98	341(6th)
2012	5-5	1428	29.7	26.6	+3.1	1304	+0.3	+4.0	−3.6	1409	−3.64	+0.76	−4.40	502(45th)
2011	7-4	1174	26.6	26.2	+0.5	1136	−7.6	+6.2	−13.8	1156	−2.79	+0.39	−3.18	447(27th)
2010	7-3	1312	35.3	26.2	+9.1	1157	+0.5	+5.7	−5.2	1371	−1.98	+0.31	−2.29	488(40th)
2009	11-2	1575	34.5	26.5	+7.9	1226	+3.3	+6.3	−3.0	1426	−0.24	+0.59	−0.82	526(54th)
2008	8-4	1384	29.8	16.7	+13.2	1101	−3.4	−0.1	−3.3	1417	−2.80	+0.54	−3.34	507(47th)
2007	6-4	1162	18.3	16.7	+1.6	1081	−12.6	+1.8	−14.3	1142	−3.23	+0.19	−3.43	452(28th)
2006	11-1	1415	25.7	12.6	+13.1	1074	−7.0	−3.4	−3.5	1412	−0.25	+0.58	−0.83	532(56th)
2005	6-4	897	19.8	16.3	+3.5	991	−14.5	+3.0	−17.4	1065	−3.64	+0.17	−3.81	420(19th)
2004	7-4	1129	21.1	20.6	+0.5	976	−16.4	+4.0	−20.4	991	−3.51	+0.13	−3.64	426(21st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.