← Back
CLASS 6A · District 32-6A

PSJA North Raiders

Enrollment: 2,220 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#85
was #85
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1658
#85 of 249
OVR Grade
79
#85 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Laredo United (0-0) 1559
 60% (+4) — — — —
2
Mission Veterans Memorial
 90% (+22) — — — —
3
@Edinburg Vela (0-0) 1516
 64% (+6) — — — —
4
@Weslaco (0-0) 1499
 66% (+6) — — — —
5
@Edinburg Economedes (0-0) 1220
 86% (+18) — — — —
7
Los Fresnos (0-0) 1479
 68% (+7) — — — —
8
Harlingen (0-0) 1406
 74% (+10) — — — —
9
@San Benito (0-0) 1261
 84% (+16) — — — —
10
PSJA (0-0) 938
 95% (+29) — — — —
11
@Brownsville Veterans Memorial (0-0) 1478
 68% (+7) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 32-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 85
Raiders
79
1658
0-0 0-0 — — 3.9-1.1 97.2% D2
2 121
Chargers
76.3
1478
0-0 0-0 — — 3-2 87.7% D2
3 120
Falcons
76.3
1479
0-0 0-0 — — 3-2 87% D1
4 144
Cardinals
75.2
1406
0-0 0-0 — — 2.6-2.4 78.6% D1
5 171
Greyhounds
73
1261
0-0 0-0 — — 1.9-3.1 44.2% —
6 215
Bears
68.1
938
0-0 0-0 — — 0.6-4.4 5.2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how PSJA North’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021
9-3
Rating 608 (79th)
#2 · 2006
11-1
Rating 532 (56th)
#3 · 2009
11-2
Rating 526 (54th)
#4 · 2008
8-4
Rating 507 (47th)
#5 · 2012
5-5
Rating 502 (45th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-0 1789 49.0 8.5 +40.5 963 +9.3 −5.9 +15.2 1879 +0.15 +0.15 0.00 —
2024 2-0 1813 31.5 16.5 +15.0 1360 +2.0 −4.2 +6.2 1655 +0.40 +0.40 0.00 —
2023 3-0 1802 43.3 5.7 +37.7 1242 +13.7 −16.4 +30.0 2251 +0.32 +0.32 0.00 —
2022 3-0 1811 33.3 22.3 +11.0 1337 +3.9 +0.5 +3.5 1586 +0.45 +0.45 0.00 —
2021 9-3 1813 38.2 17.2 +20.9 1324 +9.0 −5.5 +14.4 1861 −0.19 +1.04 −1.23 608(79th)
2020 5-3 1414 24.1 22.4 +1.8 1186 −7.6 +0.7 −8.3 1293 −2.07 +0.32 −2.39 487(39th)
2019 5-5 1254 25.4 21.5 +3.9 1248 −7.7 −1.5 −6.2 1345 −3.72 +0.16 −3.88 475(35th)
2018 7-5 1358 31.0 23.3 +7.7 1208 −0.3 +2.7 −3.0 1425 −3.73 +0.40 −4.13 496(42nd)
2017 2-8 799 14.0 23.2 −9.2 1063 −20.3 +7.5 −27.8 805 −7.32 +0.06 −7.37 363(9th)
2016 7-3 1196 23.7 11.0 +12.7 975 −11.5 −3.3 −8.3 1294 −2.47 +0.19 −2.66 483(38th)
2015 5-6 1235 28.3 32.0 −3.7 1213 −4.5 +10.3 −14.8 1130 −4.70 +0.27 −4.97 444(26th)
2014 4-6 1197 31.1 26.8 +4.3 1223 −0.9 +6.5 −7.4 1316 −4.97 +0.32 −5.29 467(32nd)
2013 0-10 801 10.5 34.7 −24.2 1278 −20.3 +14.2 −34.5 637 −8.98 0.00 −8.98 341(6th)
2012 5-5 1428 29.7 26.6 +3.1 1304 +0.3 +4.0 −3.6 1409 −3.64 +0.76 −4.40 502(45th)
2011 7-4 1174 26.6 26.2 +0.5 1136 −7.6 +6.2 −13.8 1156 −2.79 +0.39 −3.18 447(27th)
2010 7-3 1312 35.3 26.2 +9.1 1157 +0.5 +5.7 −5.2 1371 −1.98 +0.31 −2.29 488(40th)
2009 11-2 1575 34.5 26.5 +7.9 1226 +3.3 +6.3 −3.0 1426 −0.24 +0.59 −0.82 526(54th)
2008 8-4 1384 29.8 16.7 +13.2 1101 −3.4 −0.1 −3.3 1417 −2.80 +0.54 −3.34 507(47th)
2007 6-4 1162 18.3 16.7 +1.6 1081 −12.6 +1.8 −14.3 1142 −3.23 +0.19 −3.43 452(28th)
2006 11-1 1415 25.7 12.6 +13.1 1074 −7.0 −3.4 −3.5 1412 −0.25 +0.58 −0.83 532(56th)
2005 6-4 897 19.8 16.3 +3.5 991 −14.5 +3.0 −17.4 1065 −3.64 +0.17 −3.81 420(19th)
2004 7-4 1129 21.1 20.6 +0.5 976 −16.4 +4.0 −20.4 991 −3.51 +0.13 −3.64 426(21st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.