← Back
CLASS 6A · District 32-6A

San Benito Greyhounds

Enrollment: 2,587 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#167
was #179
Record
4-2
1-0 district
Elo
1282
#167 of 249
OVR Grade
73.3
#167 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
65.8
#211 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
73
#144 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1116
#182 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Edcouch-Elsa
 87% (+18) W 20-14 1223 −16.5 −5.5 +0.01 —
2
@Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690
 29% (-9) L 25-55 932 −2.6 +20.1 — −0.82
3
@Laredo Alexander (4-2) 1319
 65% (+6) L 7-28 767 −26.4 +3.0 — −0.96
4
Harlingen South
 32% (-7) W 21-15 1292 −14.2 −5.8 +0.07 —
5
@Odessa (2-5) 906
 71% (+9) W 32-28 1193 −0.5 +11.7 +0.02 —
7
Brownsville Veterans Memorial (4-2) 1432
 20% (-13) W 17-14 1287 −17.9 −9.4 +0.20 —
8
@Los Fresnos (3-3) 1360
 42% (-3) — — — — — —
9
PSJA North (5-1) 1798
 10% (-21) — — — — — —
10
Harlingen (4-2) 1428
 35% (-6) — — — — — —
11
@PSJA (2-4) 934
 81% (+14) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 32-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 67
Raiders
81.1
1798
 5-1 1-0 45.5 19.7 4.5-0.5 > 98% D2
2 138
Cardinals
75.5
1428
 4-2 1-0 31.3 20.7 2.9-2.1 85.9% D2
3 167
Greyhounds
73.3
1282
 4-2 1-0 20.3 25.7 2.7-2.3 76.9% D1
4 150
Falcons
74.5
1360
 3-3 0-1 34.0 34.7 2.3-2.7 67.2% D1
5 136
Chargers
75.6
1432
 4-2 0-1 28.3 29.3 2.1-2.9 66.3% —
6 211
Bears
68.1
934
 2-4 0-1 18.2 23.5 0.5-4.5 3.7% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Benito’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017
12-1
Rating 644 (86th)
#2 · 2022
11-2
Rating 631 (84th)
#3 · 2016
10-2
Rating 603 (78th)
#4 · 2021
8-3
Rating 600 (77th)
#5 · 2004
12-1
Rating 585 (73rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-9 1142 12.2 32.2 −20.0 1571 −11.4 +3.6 −15.1 1123 −5.66 +0.26 −5.93 441(25th)
2024 2-9 1168 13.4 34.5 −21.2 1445 −13.4 +8.5 −21.8 954 −6.41 +0.09 −6.50 421(20th)
2023 10-2 1595 41.3 15.4 +25.9 1129 +6.4 −3.6 +10.0 1750 −0.79 +0.66 −1.45 578(71st)
2022 11-2 1856 37.3 12.1 +25.2 1338 +7.7 −11.1 +18.8 1969 +0.52 +1.04 −0.52 631(84th)
2021 8-3 1662 30.1 10.3 +19.8 1350 +2.1 −12.2 +14.2 1856 −0.54 +0.84 −1.38 600(77th)
2020 3-3 1497 34.7 19.3 +15.3 1325 +4.9 −4.7 +9.5 1738 −1.98 +0.13 −2.11 —
2019 7-5 1641 34.2 27.8 +6.4 1481 +4.9 −1.3 +6.2 1655 −1.99 +0.65 −2.63 561(66th)
2018 8-4 1732 33.6 29.2 +4.3 1481 +6.9 +1.4 +5.5 1637 −1.17 +0.65 −1.82 562(66th)
2017 12-1 2066 45.2 20.8 +24.3 1436 +17.7 −4.7 +22.4 2060 +2.30 +2.37 −0.07 644(86th)
2016 10-2 1813 38.2 16.8 +21.5 1376 +8.8 −5.6 +14.4 1861 +0.46 +1.70 −1.24 603(78th)
2015 10-3 1661 36.7 21.2 +15.5 1278 +4.1 −2.9 +7.0 1675 −0.50 +1.15 −1.65 562(66th)
2014 6-5 1257 33.4 28.8 +4.5 1201 +0.3 +8.9 −8.7 1283 −3.77 +0.53 −4.30 468(32nd)
2013 3-7 1116 18.1 25.5 −7.4 1278 −12.7 +3.9 −16.6 1085 −6.02 +0.22 −6.24 430(22nd)
2012 6-4 1527 22.0 13.3 +8.7 1310 −7.8 −9.5 +1.7 1543 −2.47 +0.94 −3.41 542(59th)
2011 9-3 1434 32.6 20.0 +12.6 1181 −1.9 −1.6 −0.3 1493 −1.29 +0.54 −1.82 515(50th)
2010 4-7 972 20.9 29.5 −8.5 1163 −13.8 +9.7 −23.4 915 −5.33 +0.02 −5.36 398(14th)
2009 6-5 1316 34.8 28.9 +5.9 1178 −0.5 +5.4 −6.0 1351 −3.16 +0.60 −3.77 485(39th)
2008 5-4 1142 26.1 22.8 +3.3 1075 −9.0 +2.7 −11.7 1209 −3.17 +0.08 −3.26 451(28th)
2007 7-4 1249 32.9 17.3 +15.6 1052 −3.9 −0.2 −3.7 1407 −2.80 +0.23 −3.02 493(42nd)
2006 7-4 1328 33.7 17.2 +16.5 1066 −2.1 −0.3 −1.8 1455 −2.95 +0.31 −3.26 508(47th)
2005 6-5 1283 26.0 18.9 +7.1 1242 −3.8 +0.1 −3.9 1402 −4.12 +0.30 −4.42 493(42nd)
2004 12-1 1597 37.2 14.2 +23.0 1139 +3.6 −4.6 +8.2 1704 +0.44 +0.74 −0.29 585(73rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.