← Back
CLASS 6A · District 32-6A

San Benito Greyhounds

Enrollment: 2,587 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#171
was #171
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1261
#171 of 249
OVR Grade
73
#171 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
Edcouch-Elsa
87% (+18)
2
@Edinburg Vela (0-0) 1516
26% (-10)
3
@Laredo Alexander (0-0) 1125
64% (+5)
4
Harlingen South
41% (-4)
5
@Odessa (0-0) 887
83% (+15)
7 29% (-9)
8
@Los Fresnos (0-0) 1479
29% (-9)
9
PSJA North (0-0) 1658
16% (-16)
10
Harlingen (0-0) 1406
35% (-6)
11
@PSJA (0-0) 938
79% (+13)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 32-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 85
Raiders
79
1658
0-0 0-0 3.9-1.1 97.2% D2
2 121
Chargers
76.3
1478
0-0 0-0 3-2 87.7% D2
3 120
Falcons
76.3
1479
0-0 0-0 3-2 87% D1
4 144
Cardinals
75.2
1406
0-0 0-0 2.6-2.4 78.6% D1
5 171
Greyhounds
73
1261
0-0 0-0 1.9-3.1 44.2%
6 215
Bears
68.1
938
0-0 0-0 0.6-4.4 5.2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Benito’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2017
12-1
Rating 644 (86th)
#2 · 2022
11-2
Rating 631 (84th)
#3 · 2016
10-2
Rating 603 (78th)
#4 · 2021
8-3
Rating 600 (77th)
#5 · 2004
12-1
Rating 585 (73rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 2-9 1142 12.2 32.2 −20.0 1571 −11.4 +3.6 −15.1 1123 −5.66 +0.26 −5.93 441(25th)
2024 2-9 1168 13.4 34.5 −21.2 1445 −13.4 +8.5 −21.8 954 −6.41 +0.09 −6.50 421(20th)
2023 10-2 1595 41.3 15.4 +25.9 1129 +6.4 −3.6 +10.0 1750 −0.79 +0.66 −1.45 578(71st)
2022 11-2 1856 37.3 12.1 +25.2 1338 +7.7 −11.1 +18.8 1969 +0.52 +1.04 −0.52 631(84th)
2021 8-3 1662 30.1 10.3 +19.8 1350 +2.1 −12.2 +14.2 1856 −0.54 +0.84 −1.38 600(77th)
2020 3-3 1497 34.7 19.3 +15.3 1325 +4.9 −4.7 +9.5 1738 −1.98 +0.13 −2.11
2019 7-5 1641 34.2 27.8 +6.4 1481 +4.9 −1.3 +6.2 1655 −1.99 +0.65 −2.63 561(66th)
2018 8-4 1732 33.6 29.2 +4.3 1481 +6.9 +1.4 +5.5 1637 −1.17 +0.65 −1.82 562(66th)
2017 12-1 2066 45.2 20.8 +24.3 1436 +17.7 −4.7 +22.4 2060 +2.30 +2.37 −0.07 644(86th)
2016 10-2 1813 38.2 16.8 +21.5 1376 +8.8 −5.6 +14.4 1861 +0.46 +1.70 −1.24 603(78th)
2015 10-3 1661 36.7 21.2 +15.5 1278 +4.1 −2.9 +7.0 1675 −0.50 +1.15 −1.65 562(66th)
2014 6-5 1257 33.4 28.8 +4.5 1201 +0.3 +8.9 −8.7 1283 −3.77 +0.53 −4.30 468(32nd)
2013 3-7 1116 18.1 25.5 −7.4 1278 −12.7 +3.9 −16.6 1085 −6.02 +0.22 −6.24 430(22nd)
2012 6-4 1527 22.0 13.3 +8.7 1310 −7.8 −9.5 +1.7 1543 −2.47 +0.94 −3.41 542(59th)
2011 9-3 1434 32.6 20.0 +12.6 1181 −1.9 −1.6 −0.3 1493 −1.29 +0.54 −1.82 515(50th)
2010 4-7 972 20.9 29.5 −8.5 1163 −13.8 +9.7 −23.4 915 −5.33 +0.02 −5.36 398(14th)
2009 6-5 1316 34.8 28.9 +5.9 1178 −0.5 +5.4 −6.0 1351 −3.16 +0.60 −3.77 485(39th)
2008 5-4 1142 26.1 22.8 +3.3 1075 −9.0 +2.7 −11.7 1209 −3.17 +0.08 −3.26 451(28th)
2007 7-4 1249 32.9 17.3 +15.6 1052 −3.9 −0.2 −3.7 1407 −2.80 +0.23 −3.02 493(42nd)
2006 7-4 1328 33.7 17.2 +16.5 1066 −2.1 −0.3 −1.8 1455 −2.95 +0.31 −3.26 508(47th)
2005 6-5 1283 26.0 18.9 +7.1 1242 −3.8 +0.1 −3.9 1402 −4.12 +0.30 −4.42 493(42nd)
2004 12-1 1597 37.2 14.2 +23.0 1139 +3.6 −4.6 +8.2 1704 +0.44 +0.74 −0.29 585(73rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.