← Back

CLASS 6A · District 28-6A

San Antonio Churchill Chargers

Enrollment: 2,297 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 8

Rank

#192

was #192

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1132

#192 of 249

OVR Grade

71

#192 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Castroville Medina Valley	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
2	@Schertz Clemens (0-0) 1372	27% (-10)	—	—	—	—
3	Kerrville Tivy	33% (-7)	—	—	—	—
5	San Antonio Clark (0-0) 1399	25% (-11)	—	—	—	—
6	@San Antonio Reagan (0-0) 1685	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
7	San Antonio Brandeis (0-0) 1625	11% (-20)	—	—	—	—
8	San Antonio Madison (0-0) 1302	33% (-7)	—	—	—	—
9	@San Antonio Lee (0-0) 625	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
10	#27San Antonio Johnson (0-0) 2140	< 2% (-40)	—	—	—	—
11	@San Antonio Roosevelt (0-0) 1442	21% (-12)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 28-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		27	San Antonio Johnson (2) Jaguars	86.3 2140	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D1
2		79	San Antonio Reagan (1) Rattlers	79.4 1685	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.9-2.1	92.4%	D1
3		87	San Antonio Brandeis (4) Broncos	78.5 1625	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	87.7%	D2
4		135	San Antonio Roosevelt (7) Rough Riders	75.7 1442	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.6-3.4	55.7%	D2
5		146	San Antonio Clark (3) Cougars	75.1 1399	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.3-3.7	39.1%	—
6		166	San Antonio Madison (6) Mavericks	73.6 1302	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.8-4.2	20.1%	—
7		192	San Antonio Churchill (8) Chargers	71 1132	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.1	5.2%	—
8		243	San Antonio Lee (5) Volunteers	63.4 625	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.3-6.7	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Churchill’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016

11-3

Rating 620 (82nd)

#2 · 2006

8-3

Rating 603 (78th)

#3 · 2014

8-3

Rating 598 (77th)

#4 · 2010

7-4

Rating 585 (74th)

#5 · 2011

6-6

Rating 582 (72nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	993	21.6	34.4	−12.8	1388	−8.5	+8.9	−17.4	1064	−5.96	+0.02	−5.98	419(19th)
2024	6-5	1354	26.6	20.7	+5.9	1292	−4.4	−1.8	−2.6	1436	−3.25	+0.33	−3.58	502(45th)
2023	6-4	1248	21.1	19.7	+1.4	1211	−11.3	−1.2	−10.1	1248	−2.39	+0.49	−2.87	471(34th)
2022	5-6	1370	19.3	23.1	−3.8	1447	−9.5	−3.8	−5.7	1357	−3.34	+0.50	−3.84	489(40th)
2021	2-8	1236	15.5	23.4	−7.9	1507	−13.7	−4.5	−9.2	1271	−4.22	+0.02	−4.24	462(31st)
2020	5-5	1498	21.8	20.5	+1.3	1506	−4.9	−5.7	+0.8	1520	−1.37	+0.48	−1.84	514(50th)
2019	4-6	1374	18.7	21.2	−2.5	1486	−8.5	−5.5	−3.1	1423	−2.94	+0.17	−3.12	496(43rd)
2018	5-6	1434	27.5	27.1	+0.5	1521	+0.3	−0.1	+0.3	1508	−2.54	+0.26	−2.79	513(49th)
2017	5-5	1471	26.6	28.7	−2.1	1599	−2.3	−3.3	+1.0	1526	−2.26	+0.35	−2.61	519(52nd)
2016	11-3	2030	24.5	17.6	+6.9	1625	0.0	−11.3	+11.4	1784	+1.79	+2.50	−0.71	620(82nd)
2015	6-5	1692	31.0	26.4	+4.6	1558	+1.3	−6.7	+8.0	1700	−1.73	+0.61	−2.34	561(66th)
2014	8-3	1803	31.1	18.4	+12.7	1560	+5.9	−9.3	+15.2	1881	+0.39	+1.55	−1.17	598(77th)
2013	6-5	1675	30.6	26.6	+4.0	1725	+4.6	−8.6	+13.2	1830	−0.77	+0.76	−1.53	580(72nd)
2012	4-7	1592	27.8	34.7	−6.9	1657	+3.4	+4.6	−1.2	1470	−2.32	+0.77	−3.09	524(53rd)
2011	6-6	1729	28.3	24.5	+3.8	1610	+4.5	−4.0	+8.4	1711	−2.06	+1.26	−3.31	582(72nd)
2010	7-4	1721	30.2	19.5	+10.6	1525	+5.3	−7.5	+12.8	1820	+0.33	+2.15	−1.82	585(74th)
2009	3-7	1295	18.1	20.2	−2.1	1661	−1.7	−6.2	+4.5	1614	−3.04	+0.61	−3.65	518(52nd)
2008	2-8	1355	11.3	25.0	−13.7	1641	−9.8	−2.7	−7.1	1322	−4.56	+0.13	−4.68	486(39th)
2007	4-6	1659	20.1	23.6	−3.5	1707	−2.2	−7.0	+4.8	1619	−2.24	+0.82	−3.05	554(63rd)
2006	8-3	1799	27.7	21.2	+6.5	1717	+6.7	−8.7	+15.4	1885	+0.75	+2.16	−1.40	603(78th)
2005	5-5	1636	16.2	17.2	−1.0	1627	−4.2	−9.1	+4.9	1623	−1.91	+2.04	−3.95	558(65th)
2004	7-3	1687	26.1	19.7	+6.4	1559	+3.0	−7.1	+10.1	1752	−0.10	+1.17	−1.27	578(71st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.