← Back
CLASS 6A · District 28-6A

San Antonio Madison Mavericks

Enrollment: 2,477 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#141
was #128
Record
4-2
1-2 district
Elo
1423
#141 of 249
OVR Grade
75.4
#141 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
68.5
#187 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
77.8
#95 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1353
#149 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
New Braunfels Canyon (3-3) 1358
 45% (-2) W 10-0 1563 −13.3 −15.9 +0.11 —
2
San Antonio Jay
 79% (+13) W 21-0 1481 −17.9 −17.1 +0.04 —
3
@San Marcos (0-6) 1254
 50% (0) W 24-16 1250 −12.8 −2.8 +0.15 —
5
San Antonio Roosevelt (3-3) 1374
 72% (+9) L 43-45 1297 +5.9 +14.0 — −0.91
6
@San Antonio Clark (1-5) 1197
 78% (+12) W 28-26 1272 −3.4 +5.7 +0.05 —
7
San Antonio Reagan (3-2-1) 1744
 27% (-9) L 9-21 1256 −13.7 −3.9 — −0.65
8
@San Antonio Churchill (1-5) 1096
 80% (+13) — — — — — —
9
San Antonio Brandeis (3-3) 1461
 46% (-2) — — — — — —
10
San Antonio Lee (3-3) 836
 92% (+23) — — — — — —
11
@#18San Antonio Johnson (5-0) 2290
 3% (-35) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 28-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 18
Jaguars
88.5
2290
 5-0 3-0 48.8 11.2 6.9-0.1 > 98% D1
2 74
Rattlers
80.3
1744
 3-2 3-0 20.3 25.2 5.8-1.2 > 98% D1
3 147
Rough Riders
74.7
1374
 3-3 2-1 33.3 37.8 4-3 73.6% D2
4 128
Broncos
76
1461
 3-3 1-2 23.7 26.2 3.8-3.2 74.4% D2
5 141
Mavericks
75.4
1423
 4-2 1-2 22.5 18.0 3.2-3.8 43.7% —
6 192
Chargers
70.5
1096
 1-5 1-2 26.3 45.0 2.2-4.8 5.7% —
7 177
Cougars
72
1197
 1-5 1-2 20.7 30.0 1.7-5.3 2.5% —
8 220
Volunteers
66.6
836
 3-3 0-3 23.7 31.7 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Madison’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2013
11-4
Rating 704 (94th)
#2 · 2007
13-2
Rating 699 (94th)
#3 · 2012
11-3
Rating 689 (93rd)
#4 · 2018
9-3
Rating 651 (88th)
#5 · 2011
10-5
Rating 650 (87th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 3-8 1285 25.3 35.0 −9.7 1553 −2.5 +5.2 −7.7 1307 −4.38 +0.15 −4.52 478(36th)
2024 2-8 1130 21.5 34.1 −12.6 1454 −6.9 +8.3 −15.2 1119 −5.70 +0.04 −5.74 440(24th)
2023 4-6 1075 27.2 29.2 −2.0 1237 −5.1 +7.4 −12.5 1188 −4.54 +0.33 −4.88 447(27th)
2022 3-7 1392 26.2 28.3 −2.1 1413 −2.4 +3.1 −5.5 1362 −5.02 +0.21 −5.23 491(41st)
2021 6-5 1716 26.7 19.6 +7.1 1567 +1.8 −7.1 +8.9 1723 −0.20 +1.68 −1.88 566(67th)
2020 6-5 1728 23.3 23.8 −0.5 1612 −0.1 −3.3 +3.2 1581 −0.84 +0.79 −1.63 543(60th)
2019 9-3 2027 30.0 25.8 +4.2 1613 +6.4 −3.6 +10.0 1750 +1.34 +2.20 −0.86 599(77th)
2018 9-3 2078 37.4 20.3 +17.1 1620 +12.7 −8.4 +21.1 2029 +1.99 +2.87 −0.88 651(88th)
2017 4-7 1624 36.2 37.0 −0.8 1744 +11.4 +4.0 +7.3 1684 −2.12 +0.64 −2.76 556(64th)
2016 4-7 1398 20.5 23.6 −3.1 1815 −0.5 −8.6 +8.0 1700 −2.50 +0.30 −2.80 545(60th)
2015 0-10 1180 21.6 43.9 −22.3 1836 −2.5 +6.8 −9.2 1269 −5.50 0.00 −5.50 469(33rd)
2014 4-6 1770 18.5 23.3 −4.8 1737 −3.2 −7.0 +3.7 1593 −1.68 +0.89 −2.57 556(64th)
2013 11-4 2160 40.3 25.3 +15.0 1830 +17.0 −10.7 +27.7 2193 +3.45 +4.52 −1.07 704(94th)
2012 11-3 2151 39.4 20.1 +19.4 1742 +16.5 −11.8 +28.2 2206 +2.85 +3.55 −0.70 689(93rd)
2011 10-5 2077 31.7 31.5 +0.3 1807 +11.5 −2.1 +13.6 1839 +2.35 +3.88 −1.53 650(87th)
2010 7-4 1795 29.7 24.5 +5.2 1751 +8.5 −7.4 +15.9 1897 +0.64 +2.94 −2.30 606(79th)
2009 6-4 1818 28.0 17.9 +10.1 1680 +7.9 −9.3 +17.3 1932 −0.32 +1.57 −1.90 611(80th)
2008 9-3 1979 36.0 25.6 +10.4 1687 +15.7 −3.0 +18.7 1967 +1.51 +2.69 −1.18 630(84th)
2007 13-2 2157 37.0 17.6 +19.4 1749 +14.5 −15.1 +29.7 2242 +4.63 +5.09 −0.46 699(94th)
2006 5-5 1619 29.8 24.2 +5.6 1715 +8.9 −4.9 +13.8 1845 −1.66 +0.92 −2.59 581(72nd)
2005 11-3 2006 29.5 21.5 +8.0 1651 +9.7 −5.2 +14.9 1872 +1.95 +3.10 −1.15 634(85th)
2004 8-4 1486 26.8 24.5 +2.3 1625 +5.4 −3.2 +8.6 1714 −0.71 +1.76 −2.47 555(63rd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.