| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 43% (-3) | W 38-7 | 2743 | +18.9 | −30.8 | +0.81 | — | |
| 3 | Odessa (2-5) 906 |
> 98% (+53) | W 37-0 | 2018 | +4.5 | −16.3 | +0.02 | — |
| 5 | @San Antonio Lee (3-3) 836 |
> 98% (+54) | W 66-6 | 2352 | +25.3 | −8.8 | +0.02 | — |
| 6 | San Antonio Brandeis (3-3) 1461 |
97% (+34) | W 38-25 | 1715 | +10.3 | +1.7 | +0.15 | — |
| 7 | San Antonio Roosevelt (3-3) 1374 |
98% (+36) | W 65-18 | 2522 | +27.9 | −13.0 | +0.12 | — |
| 8 | @San Antonio Clark (1-5) 1197 |
> 98% (+44) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | San Antonio Reagan (3-2-1) 1744 |
91% (+22) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @San Antonio Churchill (1-5) 1096 |
> 98% (+48) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | San Antonio Madison (4-2) 1423 |
97% (+35) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#18
was #18
Record
5-0
3-0 district
Elo
2290
#18 of 249
OVR Grade
88.5
#18 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
87.2
#26 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
86.4
#31 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2270
#27 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 28-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Johnson’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2013
12-3
Rating 692 (93rd)
#2 · 2025
13-1
Rating 664 (90th)
#3 · 2017
8-3
Rating 646 (87th)
#4 · 2015
7-4
Rating 635 (85th)
#5 · 2020
9-2
Rating 629 (84th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.