| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aldine Nimitz (3-3) 1518 |
81% (+14) | W 38-10 | 2076 | +9.6 | −13.4 | +0.17 | — |
| 2 | Crosby (4-3) 1793 |
69% (+8) | W 45-20 | 2436 | +22.0 | −15.4 | +0.32 | — |
| 3 | @Dayton |
85% (+17) | W 40-20 | 1982 | +11.6 | −7.6 | +0.19 | — |
| 4 | Clear Falls (3-3) 1637 |
78% (+12) | W 44-17 | 2228 | +14.3 | −14.9 | +0.30 | — |
| 5 | @Clear Creek (1-5) 1150 |
97% (+34) | W 65-13 | 2466 | +31.3 | −7.3 | +0.05 | — |
| 6 | @Clear Brook (1-5) 686 |
> 98% (+53) | W 72-11 | 2204 | +22.2 | −6.0 | +0.01 | — |
| 8 | #22Dickinson (3-3) 2210 |
30% (-8) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Clear Lake (2-4) 1116 |
98% (+36) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | #30Deer Park (6-0) 2095 |
41% (-4) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Clear Springs (2-4) 1518 |
88% (+19) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#43
was #45
Record
6-0
3-0 district
Elo
2004
#43 of 249
OVR Grade
84.2
#43 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
88
#20 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
84.2
#39 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2232
#29 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 18-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Barbers Hill’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.