← Back

CLASS 6A · District 11-6A

Dallas Skyline Raiders

Enrollment: 3,573 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#197

was #197

Record

1-5

0-3 district

Elo

1070

#197 of 249

OVR Grade

70.1

#197 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

68.5

#186 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

65.9

#203 of 249 in 6A

Perf

1004

#198 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@Mesquite	58% (+3)	W 29-22	1271	−7.1	+2.1	+0.08	—
2	Denton Braswell (5-1) 1736	43% (-3)	L 10-45	758	−15.9	+13.7	—	−0.84
3	Grand Prairie (3-3) 962	80% (+13)	L 28-36	568	−9.1	+28.2	—	−0.98
4	@Crowley (2-4) 1433	26% (-10)	L 14-52	773	−9.3	+19.8	—	−0.88
5	#4Waxahachie (5-1) 2612	< 2% (-65)	L 14-61	1377	+0.4	+5.4	—	−0.03
7	@Mansfield Lake Ridge (4-2) 1880	3% (-32)	L 18-37	1279	−14.1	−5.2	—	−0.47
8	@Mansfield (2-4) 1536	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	#1North Crowley (6-0) 2885	< 2% (-73)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	@Red Oak (4-2) 1711	6% (-26)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	#7Duncanville (3-3) 2485	< 2% (-57)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 11-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		1	North Crowley (4) Panthers	97.5 2885	6-0	3-0	38.5	15.2	7-0	> 98%	D2
2		4	Waxahachie (3) Indians	93.4 2612	5-1	2-1	47.3	25.2	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3		7	Duncanville (1) Panthers	91.5 2485	3-3	2-1	29.7	18.0	5.3-1.7	> 98%	D1
4		56	Mansfield Lake Ridge (5) Eagles	82.3 1880	4-2	2-1	38.7	40.2	3.6-3.4	67.8%	D2
5		83	Red Oak (8) Hawks	79.8 1711	4-2	2-1	26.2	27.2	3.3-3.7	32%	—
6		135	Crowley (7) Eagles	75.6 1433	2-4	1-2	27.8	27.5	1.5-5.5	< 2%	—
7		113	Mansfield (6) Tigers	77.1 1536	2-4	0-3	31.2	35.2	1.5-5.5	< 2%	—
8		197	Dallas Skyline (2) Raiders	70.1 1070	1-5	0-3	18.8	42.2	0.2-6.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Dallas Skyline’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2011

13-1

Rating 769 (98th)

#2 · 2014

14-1

Rating 749 (97th)

#3 · 2012

12-2

Rating 729 (96th)

#4 · 2013

11-2

Rating 715 (95th)

#5 · 2009

12-1

Rating 713 (95th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-8	1369	7.6	46.0	−38.4	2002	−9.6	+6.0	−15.7	1109	−3.27	+0.06	−3.33	481(37th)
2024	4-6	1671	22.2	28.1	−5.9	1918	+1.6	−10.1	+11.7	1793	−1.08	+1.01	−2.09	598(77th)
2023	3-7	1379	20.7	26.5	−5.8	1813	−2.0	−8.5	+6.4	1661	−2.74	+0.42	−3.17	547(61st)
2022	0-10	1060	5.2	36.9	−31.7	1884	−14.4	+1.1	−15.5	1112	−5.75	0.00	−5.75	444(26th)
2021	1-9	1353	15.3	30.5	−15.2	1700	−11.2	−3.4	−7.8	1306	−4.65	+0.04	−4.68	477(35th)
2020	5-4	1652	20.3	27.9	−7.6	1729	−3.3	−6.1	+2.8	1570	−0.30	+1.40	−1.70	542(59th)
2019	7-4	1694	29.8	21.3	+8.5	1400	+1.4	−4.7	+6.2	1654	−1.36	+0.57	−1.93	555(64th)
2018	7-3	1555	43.8	27.1	+16.7	1354	+10.3	+0.3	+10.0	1749	−0.79	+0.40	−1.19	556(64th)
2017	4-6	1390	30.8	37.4	−6.6	1648	+2.2	+2.7	−0.4	1489	−2.56	+0.27	−2.83	507(47th)
2016	5-6	1655	22.8	31.2	−8.4	1593	−7.0	−1.0	−6.0	1350	−2.17	+0.29	−2.46	512(49th)
2015	9-3	2283	35.0	13.3	+21.7	1537	+7.0	−16.1	+23.1	2076	+0.89	+1.99	−1.10	679(91st)
2014	14-1	2609	45.2	19.3	+25.9	1695	+17.9	−15.8	+33.7	2342	+5.00	+5.01	−0.01	749(97th)
2013	11-2	2430	46.0	19.8	+26.2	1623	+18.8	−11.6	+30.3	2258	+3.42	+3.86	−0.44	715(95th)
2012	12-2	2454	46.1	22.1	+23.9	1733	+19.4	−13.3	+32.7	2318	+4.45	+4.87	−0.42	729(96th)
2011	13-1	2467	43.1	12.1	+31.0	1670	+19.3	−19.5	+38.8	2471	+5.08	+5.13	−0.06	769(98th)
2010	9-2	2139	29.5	14.6	+14.9	1498	+4.3	−14.2	+18.5	1963	+1.53	+2.54	−1.01	659(89th)
2009	12-1	2207	45.6	13.6	+32.0	1531	+19.2	−13.2	+32.4	2311	+3.17	+3.52	−0.35	713(95th)
2008	12-2	2168	36.1	14.1	+21.9	1526	+9.9	−13.1	+23.0	2075	+2.81	+3.70	−0.89	688(93rd)
2007	12-2	2052	36.9	9.7	+27.1	1487	+10.1	−15.8	+25.9	2149	+2.00	+2.67	−0.67	695(93rd)
2006	7-4	1512	27.7	13.5	+14.2	1349	−1.6	−9.1	+7.5	1687	−1.93	+0.74	−2.67	565(67th)
2005	7-4	1517	23.1	16.4	+6.7	1354	−4.0	−4.9	+0.9	1522	−1.75	+0.60	−2.35	537(58th)
2004	7-4	1610	29.5	19.3	+10.2	1330	+1.0	−1.5	+2.5	1562	−1.56	+0.71	−2.27	546(61st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.