← Back
CLASS 6A · District 11-6A

Mansfield Tigers

Enrollment: 2,638 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#113
was #110
Record
2-4
0-3 district
Elo
1536
#113 of 249
OVR Grade
77.1
#113 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
80.6
#72 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
74.6
#126 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1685
#95 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
#48Arlington Martin (6-0) 1961
 30% (-8) L 35-38 1897 +13.4 −2.4 — −0.71
2
@Mansfield Summit
 29% (-9) W 49-28 1976 +20.0 +1.0 +0.28 —
3
Plano (2-4) 1451
 71% (+9) W 31-28 1492 +3.5 +3.8 +0.12 —
4
Red Oak (4-2) 1711
 43% (-3) L 20-23 1555 −4.3 −6.5 — −0.68
5
@Mansfield Lake Ridge (4-2) 1880
 23% (-12) L 45-49 1654 +12.9 +6.8 — −0.50
7
@#7Duncanville (3-3) 2485
 < 2% (-38) L 7-45 1537 +2.1 +0.6 — −0.07
8
Dallas Skyline (1-5) 1070
 88% (+19) — — — — — —
9
@Crowley (2-4) 1433
 61% (+4) — — — — — —
10
#1North Crowley (6-0) 2885
 < 2% (-54) — — — — — —
11
@#4Waxahachie (5-1) 2612
 < 2% (-43) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 11-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 1
Panthers
97.5
2885
 6-0 3-0 38.5 15.2 7-0 > 98% D2
2 4
Indians
93.4
2612
 5-1 2-1 47.3 25.2 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 7
Panthers
91.5
2485
 3-3 2-1 29.7 18.0 5.3-1.7 > 98% D1
4 56
Eagles
82.3
1880
 4-2 2-1 38.7 40.2 3.6-3.4 67.8% D2
5 83
Hawks
79.8
1711
 4-2 2-1 26.2 27.2 3.3-3.7 32% —
6 135
Eagles
75.6
1433
 2-4 1-2 27.8 27.5 1.5-5.5 < 2% —
7 113
Tigers
77.1
1536
 2-4 0-3 31.2 35.2 1.5-5.5 < 2% —
8 197
Raiders
70.1
1070
 1-5 0-3 18.8 42.2 0.2-6.8 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Mansfield’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2015
12-3
Rating 733 (96th)
#2 · 2017
11-2
Rating 706 (94th)
#3 · 2016
9-3
Rating 691 (93rd)
#4 · 2014
7-4
Rating 668 (90th)
#5 · 2011
11-2
Rating 658 (89th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 5-6 1500 29.6 37.6 −8.0 1575 −0.3 +3.5 −3.8 1405 −2.73 +0.62 −3.35 511(48th)
2024 8-3 1725 34.2 33.4 +0.8 1544 +4.9 +0.9 +4.0 1599 +0.62 +1.63 −1.01 557(64th)
2023 6-4 1590 28.6 36.3 −7.7 1793 +6.2 +1.4 +4.8 1621 −0.28 +0.76 −1.03 558(65th)
2022 7-4 1728 27.6 20.4 +7.3 1823 +6.4 −14.0 +20.4 2011 +0.48 +1.23 −0.76 618(82nd)
2021 4-6 1475 26.2 33.5 −7.3 1756 +1.9 +0.6 +1.3 1531 −2.13 +0.56 −2.69 521(52nd)
2020 4-6 1632 18.0 30.3 −12.3 1889 −2.6 −5.4 +2.8 1570 −0.84 +1.17 −2.01 549(62nd)
2019 4-6 1614 26.1 31.1 −5.0 1635 +2.4 −3.1 +5.5 1636 −2.38 +0.56 −2.94 546(61st)
2018 3-7 1681 16.8 20.3 −3.5 1661 −5.1 −11.0 +5.9 1647 −3.65 +0.30 −3.95 553(63rd)
2017 11-2 2306 34.9 15.5 +19.5 1732 +12.2 −16.5 +28.7 2216 +3.84 +4.58 −0.73 706(94th)
2016 9-3 2280 41.2 25.2 +16.1 1783 +16.2 −10.7 +26.9 2172 +2.73 +3.15 −0.42 691(93rd)
2015 12-3 2425 38.7 27.1 +11.6 1902 +18.1 −9.9 +28.0 2200 +4.94 +6.54 −1.61 733(96th)
2014 7-4 2210 33.4 25.6 +7.7 1848 +9.8 −12.1 +21.9 2048 +1.28 +2.12 −0.84 668(90th)
2013 5-6 1812 21.5 27.6 −6.1 1838 −0.1 −8.8 +8.7 1718 −0.43 +1.51 −1.94 588(74th)
2012 7-5 2005 33.7 25.9 +7.7 1798 +11.1 −9.5 +20.6 2015 +0.11 +1.85 −1.75 643(86th)
2011 11-2 2086 40.8 22.0 +18.8 1546 +13.0 −8.6 +21.6 2039 +2.24 +2.75 −0.51 658(89th)
2010 8-3 1593 34.6 29.2 +5.5 1454 +5.3 +0.5 +4.9 1622 −0.47 +1.15 −1.62 548(61st)
2009 1-9 1138 15.7 37.3 −21.6 1549 −12.8 +7.4 −20.3 994 −6.33 +0.14 −6.47 421(20th)
2008 7-5 1840 27.4 26.2 +1.2 1571 +0.9 −4.5 +5.4 1636 −0.85 +1.89 −2.74 582(73rd)
2007 8-3 1516 36.7 17.0 +19.7 1278 +6.0 −4.4 +10.4 1761 −1.01 +0.59 −1.60 566(67th)
2006 3-7 1187 20.4 27.0 −6.6 1257 −10.6 +4.7 −15.3 1118 −5.50 +0.14 −5.63 445(26th)
2005 5-5 1270 16.1 26.4 −10.3 1373 −13.3 +0.7 −14.0 1149 −3.31 +0.57 −3.89 458(30th)
2004 4-6 1183 21.1 26.9 −5.8 1334 −8.2 +3.9 −12.1 1199 −4.35 +0.58 −4.94 459(30th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.