← Back

CLASS 6A · District 11-6A

Duncanville Panthers

Enrollment: 4,214 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#2

was #2

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

2708

#2 of 249

OVR Grade

94.8

#2 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@#6Allen (0-0) 2516	69% (+8)	—	—	—	—
2	Cedar Hill	98% (+36)	—	—	—	—
3	DeSoto	56% (+2)	—	—	—	—
4	#4North Crowley (0-0) 2608	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
5	@Red Oak (0-0) 1605	> 98% (+44)	—	—	—	—
7	Mansfield (0-0) 1434	> 98% (+51)	—	—	—	—
8	Crowley (0-0) 1329	> 98% (+55)	—	—	—	—
9	@#3Waxahachie (0-0) 2622	59% (+3)	—	—	—	—
10	Mansfield Lake Ridge (0-0) 1850	97% (+34)	—	—	—	—
11	@Dallas Skyline (0-0) 1327	> 98% (+55)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 11-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		2	Duncanville (1) Panthers	94.8 2708	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		3	Waxahachie (3) Indians	93.5 2622	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		4	North Crowley (4) Panthers	93.3 2608	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
4		54	Mansfield Lake Ridge (5) Eagles	81.9 1850	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	71.9%	D2
5		90	Red Oak (8) Hawks	78.2 1605	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	18.4%	—
6		137	Mansfield (6) Tigers	75.6 1434	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.7-5.3	5.1%	—
7		163	Dallas Skyline (2) Raiders	74 1327	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-5.7	2.3%	—
8		161	Crowley (7) Eagles	74 1329	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	2.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Duncanville’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022

15-0

Rating 951 (100th)

#2 · 2023

14-1

Rating 916 (100th)

#3 · 2021

13-2

Rating 891 (100th)

#4 · 2024

13-1

Rating 856 (99th)

#5 · 2025

12-2

Rating 855 (99th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	12-2	2787	34.5	13.6	+20.9	2091	+17.8	−27.3	+45.1	2628	+7.08	+7.25	−0.18	855(99th)
2024	13-1	2800	43.6	14.5	+29.1	1985	+24.2	−26.1	+50.3	2759	+6.90	+6.92	−0.02	856(99th)
2023	14-1	2919	51.3	12.7	+38.5	1924	+30.1	−25.2	+55.3	2882	+6.89	+6.92	−0.03	916(100th)
2022	15-0	2963	41.9	10.4	+31.5	1939	+23.1	−27.8	+50.8	2771	+7.89	+7.89	0.00	951(100th)
2021	13-2	2857	47.4	12.1	+35.3	1913	+29.4	−27.0	+56.3	2909	+5.54	+6.37	−0.83	891(100th)
2020	10-1	2709	48.5	12.7	+35.7	1852	+25.9	−22.3	+48.2	2706	+4.54	+4.58	−0.04	831(99th)
2019	15-1	2779	44.7	9.8	+34.9	1655	+20.8	−22.8	+43.6	2590	+4.89	+4.90	−0.01	830(99th)
2018	14-1	2756	50.3	9.1	+41.2	1624	+23.0	−23.8	+46.8	2671	+4.72	+4.74	−0.01	840(99th)
2017	11-1	2501	42.8	9.4	+33.4	1566	+18.5	−18.4	+36.9	2422	+3.25	+3.50	−0.25	764(98th)
2016	11-3	2188	32.5	20.2	+12.3	1756	+8.6	−13.6	+22.1	2054	+3.57	+3.73	−0.16	674(91st)
2015	3-7	1441	22.7	27.5	−4.8	1878	−0.4	−10.1	+9.6	1741	−2.37	+0.80	−3.18	559(65th)
2014	3-7	1445	27.3	36.5	−9.2	1938	+3.6	−3.4	+7.0	1676	−1.67	+0.99	−2.66	557(64th)
2013	5-5	1762	30.6	30.5	+0.1	1900	+10.1	−6.7	+16.8	1920	+0.70	+2.39	−1.70	616(82nd)
2012	3-7	1581	19.6	32.0	−12.4	1946	−1.5	−7.6	+6.1	1652	−1.95	+1.07	−3.02	570(69th)
2011	7-4	1747	35.5	32.6	+2.8	1665	+10.0	−0.3	+10.2	1756	−0.14	+1.46	−1.60	579(71st)
2010	8-4	1801	42.2	28.5	+13.7	1551	+14.8	−0.8	+15.6	1890	−0.35	+1.24	−1.59	602(78th)
2009	4-6	1509	21.7	25.2	−3.5	1637	−1.9	−2.9	+1.0	1525	−1.97	+1.29	−3.26	525(54th)
2008	6-5	1750	24.5	23.1	+1.4	1691	+0.6	−7.7	+8.3	1707	−0.54	+1.53	−2.07	573(70th)
2007	3-7	1388	27.0	35.7	−8.7	1740	+4.3	+3.0	+1.3	1533	−2.33	+0.78	−3.11	520(52nd)
2006	2-8	1366	21.7	26.5	−4.8	1701	−1.2	−5.8	+4.7	1617	−4.41	+0.30	−4.72	528(55th)
2005	6-4	1688	24.7	20.3	+4.4	1551	−1.1	−7.8	+6.7	1668	−1.36	+1.11	−2.46	565(67th)
2004	9-3	2009	34.4	18.4	+16.0	1629	+10.0	−10.4	+20.4	2009	+0.68	+2.07	−1.40	654(88th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.