← Back

CLASS 6A · District 11-6A

North Crowley Panthers

Enrollment: 3,049 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#4

was #4

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

2608

#4 of 249

OVR Grade

93.3

#4 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	#22Aledo (0-0) 2165	86% (+18)	—	—	—	—
2	#9Southlake Carroll (0-0) 2444	66% (+7)	—	—	—	—
3	#5Humble Summer Creek (0-0) 2589	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
4	@#2Duncanville (0-0) 2708	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
5	Crowley (0-0) 1329	> 98% (+51)	—	—	—	—
7	@#3Waxahachie (0-0) 2622	49% (-1)	—	—	—	—
8	Mansfield Lake Ridge (0-0) 1850	96% (+30)	—	—	—	—
9	@Dallas Skyline (0-0) 1327	> 98% (+51)	—	—	—	—
10	@Mansfield (0-0) 1434	> 98% (+47)	—	—	—	—
11	Red Oak (0-0) 1605	> 98% (+40)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 11-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		2	Duncanville (1) Panthers	94.8 2708	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		3	Waxahachie (3) Indians	93.5 2622	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.9-1.1	> 98%	D1
3		4	North Crowley (4) Panthers	93.3 2608	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.8-1.2	> 98%	D2
4		54	Mansfield Lake Ridge (5) Eagles	81.9 1850	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-3.5	71.9%	D2
5		90	Red Oak (8) Hawks	78.2 1605	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-4.5	18.4%	—
6		137	Mansfield (6) Tigers	75.6 1434	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.7-5.3	5.1%	—
7		163	Dallas Skyline (2) Raiders	74 1327	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-5.7	2.3%	—
8		161	Crowley (7) Eagles	74 1329	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.2-5.8	2.4%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how North Crowley’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024

16-0

Rating 935 (100th)

#2 · 2025

12-2

Rating 754 (98th)

#3 · 2023

14-1

Rating 748 (97th)

#4 · 2022

12-1

Rating 640 (86th)

#5 · 2005

9-2

Rating 599 (77th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	12-2	2456	47.1	19.1	+27.9	1783	+20.8	−18.2	+39.0	2474	+3.96	+4.52	−0.56	754(98th)
2024	16-0	2956	54.0	17.7	+36.3	1893	+30.8	−21.1	+51.9	2797	+8.69	+8.69	0.00	935(100th)
2023	14-1	2340	52.5	17.2	+35.3	1565	+23.4	−13.8	+37.2	2430	+4.12	+4.15	−0.02	748(97th)
2022	12-1	2008	40.0	19.4	+20.6	1463	+11.1	−7.9	+18.9	1974	+2.56	+2.66	−0.10	640(86th)
2021	7-4	1686	37.5	24.5	+13.0	1528	+7.9	−4.8	+12.7	1816	−0.64	+0.51	−1.15	575(70th)
2020	6-3	1566	22.3	16.0	+6.3	1398	−6.8	−7.6	+0.8	1520	−1.23	+0.69	−1.92	537(58th)
2019	3-7	1313	18.2	36.2	−18.0	1708	−7.3	+1.5	−8.7	1281	−3.23	+0.16	−3.40	472(34th)
2018	2-8	1025	36.6	44.5	−7.9	1572	+8.2	+14.6	−6.4	1340	−5.01	+0.04	−5.05	453(29th)
2017	4-6	1459	30.9	30.1	+0.8	1547	+3.6	+0.8	+2.9	1571	−2.40	+0.65	−3.06	523(53rd)
2016	1-8	945	17.0	35.3	−18.3	1528	−11.0	+6.6	−17.6	1060	−5.52	+0.03	−5.55	409(17th)
2015	3-7	1198	26.2	36.6	−10.4	1410	−5.8	+7.1	−12.9	1177	−4.64	+0.22	−4.86	447(27th)
2014	4-6	1068	29.5	35.4	−5.9	1359	−5.5	+6.0	−11.6	1211	−3.40	+0.08	−3.47	441(25th)
2013	0-10	842	9.1	39.5	−30.4	1524	−21.2	+8.2	−29.4	764	−6.63	0.00	−6.63	362(9th)
2012	3-7	1157	13.3	32.3	−19.0	1527	−15.3	+1.7	−17.0	1076	−3.80	+0.07	−3.87	433(23rd)
2011	3-7	1182	29.8	32.0	−2.2	1444	+0.5	+5.1	−4.5	1387	−4.14	+0.06	−4.20	478(36th)
2010	2-8	963	18.2	40.0	−21.8	1504	−11.0	+10.3	−21.3	967	−5.43	+0.05	−5.48	404(16th)
2009	1-9	918	21.7	42.2	−20.5	1548	−6.7	+12.5	−19.1	1022	−6.45	+0.04	−6.49	406(16th)
2008	4-7	1302	16.4	21.1	−4.7	1444	−11.2	−6.0	−5.2	1370	−3.77	+0.12	−3.89	487(39th)
2007	3-7	1251	17.0	26.1	−9.1	1396	−11.1	+2.0	−13.0	1174	−4.63	+0.09	−4.72	458(30th)
2006	3-7	1204	23.6	26.3	−2.7	1409	−5.4	+1.8	−7.1	1322	−5.00	+0.08	−5.09	474(35th)
2005	9-2	1728	32.2	13.8	+18.4	1347	+2.0	−9.9	+11.9	1799	−0.02	+1.27	−1.29	599(77th)
2004	7-4	1520	31.5	19.8	+11.6	1367	+2.4	−3.9	+6.3	1658	−1.84	+0.93	−2.77	550(62nd)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.