← Back
CLASS 6A · District 30-6A

Eagle Pass Eagles

Enrollment: 2,254 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#203
was #206
Record
2-4
1-2 district
Elo
1033
#203 of 249
OVR Grade
69.6
#203 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67.5
#203 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
62.6
#218 of 249 in 6A
Perf
869
#216 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Eagle Pass Winn
 96% (+30) W 42-20 988 −7.2 +13.2 +0.00 —
2
@San Antonio Taft (4-3) 1192
 52% (+1) L 27-37 866 −8.0 +17.4 — −0.94
3
Harlingen (4-2) 1428
 15% (-17) L 28-38 1212 +0.8 +12.4 — −0.78
4
@Laredo United (3-2-1) 1549
 19% (-14) L 7-56 347 −17.0 +29.1 — −0.84
5
Laredo Alexander (4-2) 1319
 33% (-7) L 17-37 792 −16.4 +12.0 — −0.93
7
San Antonio Southwest (1-4) 791
 67% (+7) W 19-14 1011 −15.9 +3.6 +0.01 —
8
@Laredo Johnson (4-2) 1205
 33% (-7) — — — — — —
9
Laredo United South (2-4) 988
 55% (+2) — — — — — —
10
@San Antonio Southwest Legacy (2-3-1) 856
 68% (+7) — — — — — —
11
Del Rio (0-6) 547
 88% (+19) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 30-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 110
Longhorns
77.3
1549
 3-2 3-0 28.3 21.3 6.6-0.4 > 98% D1
2 161
Bulldogs
73.9
1319
 4-2 3-0 32.0 27.0 5.8-1.2 > 98% D2
3 176
Wolves
72.2
1205
 4-2 2-1 35.5 25.2 4.6-2.4 90.7% D1
4 203
Eagles
69.6
1033
 2-4 1-2 23.3 33.7 3.4-3.6 57.6% D2
5 207
Panthers
68.9
988
 2-4 2-1 18.3 25.5 3.5-3.5 46.6% —
6 224
Dragons
65.9
791
 1-4 1-2 16.6 26.0 2-5 3.8% —
7 218
Titans
66.9
856
 2-3 0-3 25.2 26.8 1.7-5.3 < 2% —
8 240
Rams
62.2
547
 0-6 0-3 10.0 33.7 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Eagle Pass’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022
9-2
Rating 549 (62nd)
#2 · 2018
9-3
Rating 546 (61st)
#3 · 2017
8-3
Rating 518 (51st)
#4 · 2021
8-4
Rating 517 (51st)
#5 · 2007
9-2
Rating 508 (47th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-4 1300 32.7 24.3 +8.4 1156 +0.3 +4.8 −4.5 1387 −2.98 +0.24 −3.22 490(40th)
2024 4-5 1043 20.3 23.0 −2.7 1173 −11.4 +5.0 −16.4 1090 −4.25 +0.24 −4.48 428(21st)
2023 7-4 1292 34.5 20.4 +14.2 1115 −1.3 +0.3 −1.6 1460 −3.09 +0.14 −3.23 504(46th)
2022 9-2 1486 40.5 20.9 +19.5 1247 +8.0 −1.2 +9.2 1730 −0.85 +0.89 −1.75 549(62nd)
2021 8-4 1484 36.0 27.7 +8.3 1277 +4.6 +5.7 −1.2 1471 −2.51 +0.74 −3.25 517(51st)
2020 6-1 1638 31.7 17.6 +14.1 1251 −0.6 −4.1 +3.6 1590 +0.42 +1.14 −0.72 —
2019 7-5 1441 31.8 24.9 +6.9 1208 −2.8 +2.4 −5.2 1369 −3.33 +0.44 −3.77 506(46th)
2018 9-3 1554 26.8 13.1 +13.7 1214 −5.4 −7.0 +1.6 1541 −1.09 +0.56 −1.65 546(61st)
2017 8-3 1440 30.5 19.6 +10.8 1181 −1.9 −0.3 −1.6 1461 −1.59 +0.55 −2.13 518(51st)
2016 4-6 882 25.8 27.5 −1.7 1150 −7.7 +8.3 −16.1 1098 −4.90 +0.04 −4.94 409(17th)
2015 1-9 653 16.3 40.1 −23.8 1222 −14.7 +19.7 −34.4 640 −8.04 +0.00 −8.05 327(5th)
2014 4-6 942 27.2 33.0 −5.8 1122 −6.8 +13.4 −20.2 996 −5.43 +0.08 −5.52 401(15th)
2013 4-6 1153 16.8 19.4 −2.6 1238 −12.9 +0.6 −13.5 1163 −4.83 +0.08 −4.91 443(26th)
2012 5-5 1091 14.0 19.9 −5.9 1212 −17.4 +0.7 −18.1 1048 −4.05 +0.18 −4.23 423(20th)
2011 5-6 973 22.9 30.9 −8.0 1111 −11.2 +12.3 −23.5 912 −4.89 +0.06 −4.96 397(14th)
2010 8-3 1224 29.5 13.6 +15.8 980 −6.0 0.0 −6.0 1349 −2.59 +0.14 −2.72 491(41st)
2009 7-5 1302 29.7 24.0 +5.7 1242 −1.6 +3.1 −4.7 1381 −3.14 +0.34 −3.48 494(42nd)
2008 4-6 1056 23.0 27.3 −4.3 1164 −10.2 +8.7 −18.9 1027 −4.96 +0.13 −5.09 419(19th)
2007 9-2 1305 31.9 11.4 +20.5 847 −6.4 −1.0 −5.4 1364 −1.62 +0.20 −1.81 508(47th)
2006 3-7 775 20.3 19.3 +1.0 918 −17.5 +5.8 −23.3 916 −6.66 +0.02 −6.67 381(11th)
2005 6-4 1054 27.6 17.2 +10.4 907 −9.2 +4.9 −14.1 1148 −3.49 +0.07 −3.56 443(26th)
2004 3-7 776 15.6 20.4 −4.8 867 −24.3 +6.4 −30.7 731 −6.76 +0.06 −6.82 360(8th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.