| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @San Antonio Marshall (1-5) 693 |
76% (+11) | W 33-14 | 990 | −15.5 | +4.9 | +0.01 | — |
| 2 | San Antonio Burbank |
84% (+16) | W 47-17 | 1317 | +0.3 | +7.7 | +0.01 | — |
| 3 | @South San Antonio |
58% (+3) | T 7-7 | 950 | −32.0 | −10.0 | — | — |
| 4 | Laredo Johnson (4-2) 1205 |
37% (-5) | L 7-49 | 177 | −28.3 | +24.6 | — | −0.95 |
| 5 | @Laredo United South (2-4) 988 |
54% (+1) | L 22-25 | 980 | −10.0 | +10.8 | — | −0.98 |
| 7 | Laredo Alexander (4-2) 1319 |
15% (-17) | L 35-49 | 942 | +1.6 | +24.0 | — | −0.91 |
| 8 | Del Rio (0-6) 547 |
78% (+12) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Laredo United (3-2-1) 1549 |
5% (-28) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Eagle Pass (2-4) 1033 |
32% (-7) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @San Antonio Southwest (1-4) 791 |
57% (+3) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#218
was #218
Record
2-3-1
0-3 district
Elo
856
#218 of 249
OVR Grade
66.9
#218 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
65.2
#218 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
66.2
#200 of 249 in 6A
Perf
893
#211 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 30-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Southwest Legacy’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.