← Back

CLASS 6A · District 29-6A

San Antonio Taft Raiders

Enrollment: 2,552 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#187

was #187

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1164

#187 of 249

OVR Grade

71.5

#187 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Austin Del Valle (0-0) 904	75% (+10)	—	—	—	—
2	Eagle Pass (0-0) 1207	46% (-2)	—	—	—	—
3	@#38San Antonio Brennan (0-0) 1958	3% (-32)	—	—	—	—
4	San Antonio Stevens (0-0) 925	73% (+10)	—	—	—	—
5	@San Antonio Warren (0-0) 1057	61% (+4)	—	—	—	—
6	San Antonio Marshall (0-0) 670	89% (+20)	—	—	—	—
7	@#35San Antonio Harlan (0-0) 1967	3% (-32)	—	—	—	—
9	San Antonio Sotomayor (0-0) 1431	25% (-11)	—	—	—	—
10	@San Antonio O'Connor (0-0) 1010	66% (+6)	—	—	—	—
11	San Antonio Holmes (0-0) 629	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 29-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		35	San Antonio Harlan (1) Hawks	83.6 1967	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		38	San Antonio Brennan (2) Bears	83.5 1958	0-0	0-0	—	—	7.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
3		139	San Antonio Sotomayor (3) Wildcats	75.6 1431	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.4-2.5	92.3%	D2
4		187	San Antonio Taft (4) Raiders	71.5 1164	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.1-3.9	54%	D2
5		201	San Antonio Warren (6) Warriors	69.9 1057	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.5-4.5	26%	—
6		207	San Antonio O’Connor (7) Panthers	69.2 1010	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.2-4.8	17.2%	—
7		217	San Antonio Stevens (8) Falcons	67.9 925	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-5.3	9.4%	—
8		239	San Antonio Marshall (5) Rams	64.1 670	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.3-6.7	< 2%	—
9		242	San Antonio Holmes (9) Huskies	63.5 629	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.1-6.9	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Taft’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004

10-4

Rating 615 (81st)

#2 · 2020

7-4

Rating 566 (67th)

#3 · 2021

9-3

Rating 564 (67th)

#4 · 2022

8-4

Rating 550 (62nd)

#5 · 2023

6-5

Rating 517 (51st)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	4-6	1205	31.0	29.0	+2.0	1231	−3.3	+5.4	−8.7	1282	−4.31	+0.16	−4.47	468(32nd)
2024	6-5	1349	26.9	31.2	−4.3	1249	−5.7	+8.6	−14.3	1142	−3.04	+0.29	−3.33	463(31st)
2023	6-5	1308	26.3	16.1	+10.2	1258	−6.4	−6.6	+0.1	1503	−3.59	+0.22	−3.82	517(51st)
2022	8-4	1537	33.5	21.7	+11.8	1302	+2.5	−2.4	+4.9	1622	−1.87	+0.58	−2.45	550(62nd)
2021	9-3	1685	33.1	23.6	+9.5	1422	+3.9	−2.7	+6.6	1664	−0.41	+0.94	−1.35	564(67th)
2020	7-4	1713	30.4	23.5	+6.8	1482	+3.4	−3.7	+7.1	1677	−0.75	+1.15	−1.90	566(67th)
2019	3-7	1097	17.9	23.6	−5.7	1465	−7.8	+0.2	−8.0	1299	−3.90	+0.07	−3.97	454(29th)
2018	3-7	1086	15.8	28.8	−13.0	1464	−11.8	+2.9	−14.7	1133	−4.14	+0.09	−4.24	432(22nd)
2017	2-8	1230	23.6	34.5	−10.9	1482	−5.1	+6.5	−11.6	1210	−4.66	+0.05	−4.71	455(29th)
2016	4-6	1324	24.9	31.4	−6.5	1504	−3.5	+4.4	−7.8	1304	−3.28	+0.27	−3.55	476(35th)
2015	3-7	1370	25.4	31.0	−5.6	1528	−1.5	+2.2	−3.8	1406	−3.99	+0.20	−4.20	493(42nd)
2014	4-6	1264	24.0	28.2	−4.2	1537	−2.1	−0.1	−2.0	1449	−3.28	+0.15	−3.43	490(40th)
2013	2-7	1078	21.1	35.1	−14.0	1425	−8.8	+8.9	−17.7	1058	−4.98	+0.05	−5.04	422(20th)
2012	3-7	1202	26.5	35.3	−8.8	1461	−2.1	+7.2	−9.3	1268	−4.79	+0.55	−5.33	463(31st)
2011	1-9	861	10.2	24.5	−14.3	1428	−16.9	+0.5	−17.4	1065	−6.75	+0.09	−6.84	407(16th)
2010	0-9	927	10.9	26.8	−15.9	1478	−16.6	+0.4	−17.0	1076	−6.87	0.00	−6.87	415(18th)
2009	5-5	1368	18.6	19.0	−0.4	1371	−8.8	−4.2	−4.7	1383	−3.14	+0.34	−3.48	494(42nd)
2008	3-7	1158	18.1	25.8	−7.7	1406	−10.3	+1.5	−11.8	1205	−5.18	+0.17	−5.35	452(28th)
2007	4-7	1248	15.6	20.2	−4.5	1352	−11.8	−0.3	−11.5	1213	−4.94	+0.19	−5.13	464(31st)
2006	4-6	1259	21.3	25.0	−3.7	1433	−5.4	+0.6	−6.0	1350	−4.11	+0.21	−4.32	483(38th)
2005	2-8	1018	17.2	30.9	−13.7	1497	−6.7	+6.6	−13.3	1167	−6.31	+0.23	−6.54	438(24th)
2004	10-4	1744	34.4	17.1	+17.3	1399	+7.2	−6.1	+13.3	1832	−1.12	+1.26	−2.38	615(81st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.