| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Austin Del Valle (1-5) 681 |
75% (+10) | W 27-21 | 720 | −20.7 | +10.5 | +0.02 | — |
| 2 | Eagle Pass (2-4) 1033 |
48% (-1) | W 37-27 | 1146 | −3.5 | +10.7 | +0.07 | — |
| 3 | 5% (-28) | L 7-56 | 1148 | −4.1 | +9.9 | — | −0.36 | |
| 4 | San Antonio Stevens (2-5) 800 |
87% (+18) | W 35-7 | 1263 | −8.1 | +1.3 | +0.01 | — |
| 5 | @San Antonio Warren (4-3) 1317 |
56% (+2) | L 13-34 | 769 | −20.7 | +8.6 | — | −0.93 |
| 6 | San Antonio Marshall (1-5) 693 |
87% (+18) | W 49-7 | 1565 | +0.5 | −2.1 | +0.01 | — |
| 7 | @San Antonio Harlan (5-1) 1927 |
5% (-29) | L 6-54 | 790 | −11.9 | +16.5 | — | −0.43 |
| 9 | San Antonio Sotomayor (5-2) 1586 |
16% (-16) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @San Antonio O'Connor (3-3) 1131 |
56% (+2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | San Antonio Holmes (1-5) 523 |
94% (+27) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#178
was #176
Record
4-3
2-3 district
Elo
1192
#178 of 249
OVR Grade
72
#178 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
68.1
#194 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
68.3
#186 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1057
#193 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 29-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how San Antonio Taft’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2004
10-4
Rating 615 (81st)
#2 · 2020
7-4
Rating 566 (67th)
#3 · 2021
9-3
Rating 564 (67th)
#4 · 2022
8-4
Rating 550 (62nd)
#5 · 2023
6-5
Rating 517 (51st)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.