← Back
CLASS 6A · District 24-6A

Austin Vandegrift Vipers

Enrollment: 2,360 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#23
was #23
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2164
#23 of 249
OVR Grade
86.6
#23 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@#38San Antonio Brennan (0-0) 1958
70% (+8)
2
#27San Antonio Johnson (0-0) 2140
53% (+1)
3
@Liberty Hill
91% (+23)
4
Round Rock (0-0) 1849
79% (+13)
6 > 98% (+40)
7 91% (+23)
8
#49Cedar Park (0-0) 1896
75% (+11)
9
@Leander (0-0) 803
> 98% (+54)
10
Leander Rouse (0-0) 1250
98% (+37)
11
@Hutto (0-0) 1693
88% (+19)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 24-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 23
Vipers
86.6
2164
0-0 0-0 5.5-0.5 > 98% D2
2 49
Timberwolves
82.6
1896
0-0 0-0 4.6-1.4 > 98% D2
3 76
Hippos
79.5
1693
0-0 0-0 3.8-2.2 93.1% D1
4 91
Rangers
78.1
1601
0-0 0-0 3.3-2.7 85.1% D1
5 174
Raiders
72.8
1250
0-0 0-0 1.9-4.1 14.6%
6 184
Patriots
71.7
1173
0-0 0-0 1.6-4.4 8.1%
7 228
Lions
66.1
803
0-0 0-0 0.4-5.6 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Austin Vandegrift’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2024
15-1
Rating 785 (98th)
#2 · 2022
14-2
Rating 780 (98th)
#3 · 2023
10-1
Rating 761 (98th)
#4 · 2021
12-2
Rating 747 (97th)
#5 · 2025
12-3
Rating 709 (95th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 12-3 2280 31.4 17.1 +14.3 1755 +6.3 −19.3 +25.6 2139 +3.32 +4.71 −1.38 709(95th)
2024 15-1 2532 41.5 14.6 +26.9 1651 +15.8 −18.8 +34.6 2366 +4.96 +5.63 −0.67 785(98th)
2023 10-1 2407 41.2 7.3 +33.9 1641 +18.3 −20.7 +39.0 2475 +2.17 +2.39 −0.22 761(98th)
2022 14-2 2469 36.7 14.0 +22.7 1835 +16.2 −21.7 +37.9 2447 +5.56 +5.97 −0.41 780(98th)
2021 12-2 2422 41.8 16.0 +25.8 1758 +19.8 −16.4 +36.1 2403 +4.49 +4.74 −0.25 747(97th)
2020 9-3 2071 30.1 13.7 +16.4 1731 +5.9 −19.3 +25.3 2132 +2.02 +3.08 −1.06 667(90th)
2019 11-1 2278 27.6 13.1 +14.5 1642 +0.3 −20.3 +20.6 2016 +3.60 +3.73 −0.13 671(90th)
2018 12-1 2273 31.2 17.0 +14.2 1729 +5.3 −18.0 +23.3 2084 +4.53 +4.58 −0.06 682(92nd)
2017 7-5 1874 34.2 23.0 +11.2 1783 +10.5 −11.5 +22.0 2051 +0.46 +1.50 −1.04 631(85th)
2016 6-6 1757 21.3 18.7 +2.7 1808 +0.7 −14.6 +15.2 1880 −0.67 +0.88 −1.55 603(78th)
2015 1-0 1681 42.0 23.0 +19.0 1106 +11.3 +8.1 +3.2 1579 +0.21 +0.21 0.00
2014 1-0 1594 54.0 28.0 +26.0 1504 +26.6 −0.7 +27.3 2182 +0.13 +0.13 0.00
2013 3-1 1509 30.5 19.5 +11.0 1355 +1.3 −5.2 +6.5 1663 −0.04 +0.24 −0.28
2012 2-2 1356 25.2 19.5 +5.8 1371 −5.8 −5.3 −0.5 1487 −1.58 +0.09 −1.67
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.