| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Cleburne |
61% (+4) | W 54-27 | 1197 | +6.4 | +18.6 | +0.01 | — |
| 2 | Waco |
74% (+10) | L 24-28 | 509 | −21.8 | +17.8 | — | −0.99 |
| 3 | @Irving (0-6) 436 |
78% (+12) | W 55-20 | 1106 | −1.1 | +14.6 | +0.00 | — |
| 4 | #45Aledo (3-3) 1975 |
< 2% (-50) | L 0-69 | 440 | −11.6 | +30.8 | — | −0.27 |
| 5 | @Arlington Bowie (3-3) 1586 |
4% (-31) | L 35-41 | 1267 | +6.9 | +16.3 | — | −0.71 |
| 7 | Arlington (4-2) 1558 |
5% (-28) | L 13-58 | 481 | −16.1 | +24.7 | — | −0.78 |
| 8 | @Weatherford (4-2) 1393 |
9% (-22) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Arlington Sam Houston (3-3) 813 |
53% (+1) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Arlington Lamar (3-3) 1461 |
7% (-25) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | #48Arlington Martin (6-0) 1961 |
< 2% (-45) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#219
was #219
Record
2-4
0-3 district
Elo
838
#219 of 249
OVR Grade
66.6
#219 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
70.6
#172 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
57.6
#233 of 249 in 6A
Perf
833
#221 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 3-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Granbury’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2004
6-4
Rating 498 (43rd)
#2 · 2006
4-6
Rating 406 (16th)
#3 · 2005
1-8
Rating 396 (14th)
#4 · 2007
1-9
Rating 343 (6th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.