← Back
CLASS 6A · District 3-6A

Weatherford Kangaroos

Enrollment: 2,477 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4
Rank
#145
was #167
Record
4-2
2-1 district
Elo
1393
#145 of 249
OVR Grade
75
#145 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
73.5
#140 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
72
#156 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1358
#147 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Burleson Centennial
 76% (+11) L 21-31 797 −16.1 +12.1 — −0.98
2
@Azle
 25% (-11) W 28-14 1554 −5.9 −8.1 +0.09 —
3
Fort Worth Paschal
 80% (+13) W 31-18 1160 −10.3 +3.3 +0.02 —
4
@#48Arlington Martin (6-0) 1961
 9% (-22) L 17-60 897 −4.6 +19.6 — −0.59
5
Arlington Sam Houston (3-3) 813
 81% (+14) W 59-10 2140 +18.6 −7.0 +0.02 —
7
@Arlington Lamar (3-3) 1461
 19% (-14) W 35-28 1600 +5.1 +1.1 +0.26 —
8
Granbury (2-4) 838
 91% (+22) — — — — — —
9
@#45Aledo (3-3) 1975
 8% (-23) — — — — — —
10
Arlington Bowie (3-3) 1586
 31% (-8) — — — — — —
11
@Arlington (4-2) 1558
 33% (-7) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 3-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 48
Warriors
83.6
1961
 6-0 3-0 42.7 20.8 6.6-0.4 > 98% D1
2 45
Bearcats
83.8
1975
 3-3 2-1 31.2 17.2 5.7-1.3 > 98% D2
3 101
Volunteers
77.9
1586
 3-3 2-1 23.7 28.3 4.3-2.6 87.3% D2
4 108
Colts
77.5
1558
 4-2 2-1 37.7 26.3 3.5-3.5 56.6% D1
5 145
Kangaroos
75
1393
 4-2 2-1 31.8 26.8 3.6-3.4 48.1% —
6 129
Vikings
76
1461
 3-3 1-2 28.3 28.7 3.1-3.9 9.4% —
7 219
Pirates
66.6
838
 2-4 0-3 30.2 40.5 0.7-6.3 < 2% —
8 221
Texans
66.2
813
 3-3 0-3 25.7 32.2 0.6-6.4 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Weatherford’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019
7-4
Rating 553 (63rd)
#2 · 2022
7-3
Rating 510 (48th)
#3 · 2021
7-4
Rating 509 (48th)
#4 · 2005
7-4
Rating 505 (46th)
#5 · 2023
5-5
Rating 493 (42nd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 1-9 949 29.3 49.8 −20.5 1524 −0.7 +18.4 −19.1 1022 −6.52 +0.27 −6.79 410(17th)
2024 2-8 1082 22.6 39.8 −17.2 1480 −9.2 +10.0 −19.2 1021 −5.94 +0.06 −6.00 422(20th)
2023 5-5 1372 27.7 29.9 −2.2 1369 −4.9 +1.7 −6.6 1334 −2.92 +0.34 −3.26 493(42nd)
2022 7-3 1428 35.0 31.3 +3.7 1360 +4.8 +5.9 −1.0 1475 −1.18 +1.00 −2.18 510(48th)
2021 7-4 1497 35.4 33.0 +2.4 1414 +4.3 +6.3 −2.0 1449 −1.40 +0.67 −2.07 509(48th)
2020 5-6 1269 21.4 28.7 −7.4 1434 −6.5 +4.8 −11.3 1217 −3.82 +0.20 −4.02 453(29th)
2019 7-4 1621 45.8 35.8 +10.0 1447 +16.3 +8.8 +7.5 1687 −1.14 +1.17 −2.30 553(63rd)
2018 4-7 1343 25.5 31.6 −6.1 1529 −2.4 +1.6 −4.0 1400 −3.27 +0.46 −3.72 490(40th)
2017 0-10 857 17.2 34.2 −17.0 1448 −10.7 +8.4 −19.1 1022 −8.03 0.00 −8.03 397(14th)
2016 2-8 1104 18.2 31.4 −13.2 1406 −13.0 +3.0 −16.0 1100 −6.34 +0.10 −6.44 429(22nd)
2015 5-5 1214 22.1 32.9 −10.8 1439 −8.5 +2.6 −11.1 1222 −2.58 +0.34 −2.91 454(29th)
2014 3-7 820 25.3 43.4 −18.1 1394 −9.2 +13.1 −22.3 943 −4.50 +0.10 −4.60 383(12th)
2013 1-9 784 17.9 45.3 −27.4 1426 −13.5 +16.8 −30.3 742 −6.35 +0.03 −6.38 354(8th)
2012 3-7 1067 18.9 36.3 −17.4 1378 −12.2 +9.6 −21.8 954 −4.37 +0.08 −4.45 408(17th)
2011 3-7 980 14.5 37.1 −22.6 1456 −14.6 +8.8 −23.5 913 −4.73 +0.05 −4.78 397(14th)
2010 1-9 890 13.1 36.3 −23.2 1427 −17.7 +8.5 −26.2 846 −6.52 +0.02 −6.54 381(11th)
2009 5-5 1095 22.0 31.1 −9.1 1507 −5.8 +2.9 −8.7 1283 −2.32 +0.79 −3.11 456(29th)
2008 1-9 885 18.3 41.1 −22.8 1434 −10.8 +13.9 −24.7 882 −6.46 +0.02 −6.48 384(12th)
2007 3-8 1147 17.0 27.9 −10.9 1365 −10.4 +5.0 −15.4 1116 −5.66 +0.35 −6.01 441(25th)
2006 5-6 1282 25.1 26.6 −1.5 1333 −5.7 +2.9 −8.5 1287 −4.23 +0.25 −4.48 477(35th)
2005 7-4 1446 31.8 31.8 0.0 1389 +2.9 +7.8 −4.8 1379 −1.61 +0.79 −2.40 505(46th)
2004 4-6 1297 20.5 30.1 −9.6 1370 −8.0 +6.1 −14.0 1149 −4.55 +0.34 −4.89 463(31st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.