← Back

CLASS 6A · District 3-6A

Weatherford Kangaroos

Enrollment: 2,477 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#182

was #182

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1179

#182 of 249

OVR Grade

71.8

#182 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Burleson Centennial	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
2	@Azle	38% (-5)	—	—	—	—
3	Fort Worth Paschal	78% (+12)	—	—	—	—
4	@Arlington Martin (0-0) 1633	13% (-18)	—	—	—	—
5	Arlington Sam Houston (0-0) 659	90% (+21)	—	—	—	—
7	@Arlington Lamar (0-0) 1658	12% (-19)	—	—	—	—
8	Granbury (0-0) 811	82% (+15)	—	—	—	—
9	@#22Aledo (0-0) 2165	< 2% (-39)	—	—	—	—
10	Arlington Bowie (0-0) 1696	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
11	@Arlington (0-0) 1475	22% (-12)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 3-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		22	Aledo (6) Bearcats	86.6 2165	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2		75	Arlington Bowie (7) Volunteers	79.6 1696	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-2.2	88.7%	D2
3		84	Arlington Lamar (5) Vikings	79 1658	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	83.7%	D1
4		86	Arlington Martin (2) Warriors	78.6 1633	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	79.6%	D1
5		124	Arlington (3) Colts	76.2 1475	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	42.6%	—
6		182	Weatherford (4) Kangaroos	71.8 1179	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	5.4%	—
7		226	Granbury (8) Pirates	66.2 811	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		241	Arlington Sam Houston (1) Texans	63.9 659	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Weatherford’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019

7-4

Rating 553 (63rd)

#2 · 2022

7-3

Rating 510 (48th)

#3 · 2021

7-4

Rating 509 (48th)

#4 · 2005

7-4

Rating 505 (46th)

#5 · 2023

5-5

Rating 493 (42nd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	1-9	949	29.3	49.8	−20.5	1524	−0.7	+18.4	−19.1	1022	−6.52	+0.27	−6.79	410(17th)
2024	2-8	1082	22.6	39.8	−17.2	1480	−9.2	+10.0	−19.2	1021	−5.94	+0.06	−6.00	422(20th)
2023	5-5	1372	27.7	29.9	−2.2	1369	−4.9	+1.7	−6.6	1334	−2.92	+0.34	−3.26	493(42nd)
2022	7-3	1428	35.0	31.3	+3.7	1360	+4.8	+5.9	−1.0	1475	−1.18	+1.00	−2.18	510(48th)
2021	7-4	1497	35.4	33.0	+2.4	1414	+4.3	+6.3	−2.0	1449	−1.40	+0.67	−2.07	509(48th)
2020	5-6	1269	21.4	28.7	−7.4	1434	−6.5	+4.8	−11.3	1217	−3.82	+0.20	−4.02	453(29th)
2019	7-4	1621	45.8	35.8	+10.0	1447	+16.3	+8.8	+7.5	1687	−1.14	+1.17	−2.30	553(63rd)
2018	4-7	1343	25.5	31.6	−6.1	1529	−2.4	+1.6	−4.0	1400	−3.27	+0.46	−3.72	490(40th)
2017	0-10	857	17.2	34.2	−17.0	1448	−10.7	+8.4	−19.1	1022	−8.03	0.00	−8.03	397(14th)
2016	2-8	1104	18.2	31.4	−13.2	1406	−13.0	+3.0	−16.0	1100	−6.34	+0.10	−6.44	429(22nd)
2015	5-5	1214	22.1	32.9	−10.8	1439	−8.5	+2.6	−11.1	1222	−2.58	+0.34	−2.91	454(29th)
2014	3-7	820	25.3	43.4	−18.1	1394	−9.2	+13.1	−22.3	943	−4.50	+0.10	−4.60	383(12th)
2013	1-9	784	17.9	45.3	−27.4	1426	−13.5	+16.8	−30.3	742	−6.35	+0.03	−6.38	354(8th)
2012	3-7	1067	18.9	36.3	−17.4	1378	−12.2	+9.6	−21.8	954	−4.37	+0.08	−4.45	408(17th)
2011	3-7	980	14.5	37.1	−22.6	1456	−14.6	+8.8	−23.5	913	−4.73	+0.05	−4.78	397(14th)
2010	1-9	890	13.1	36.3	−23.2	1427	−17.7	+8.5	−26.2	846	−6.52	+0.02	−6.54	381(11th)
2009	5-5	1095	22.0	31.1	−9.1	1507	−5.8	+2.9	−8.7	1283	−2.32	+0.79	−3.11	456(29th)
2008	1-9	885	18.3	41.1	−22.8	1434	−10.8	+13.9	−24.7	882	−6.46	+0.02	−6.48	384(12th)
2007	3-8	1147	17.0	27.9	−10.9	1365	−10.4	+5.0	−15.4	1116	−5.66	+0.35	−6.01	441(25th)
2006	5-6	1282	25.1	26.6	−1.5	1333	−5.7	+2.9	−8.5	1287	−4.23	+0.25	−4.48	477(35th)
2005	7-4	1446	31.8	31.8	0.0	1389	+2.9	+7.8	−4.8	1379	−1.61	+0.79	−2.40	505(46th)
2004	4-6	1297	20.5	30.1	−9.6	1370	−8.0	+6.1	−14.0	1149	−4.55	+0.34	−4.89	463(31st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.