← Back

CLASS 6A · District 3-6A

Arlington Colts

Enrollment: 2,825 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#124

was #124

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1475

#124 of 249

OVR Grade

76.2

#124 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@#30Byron Nelson (0-0) 2077	7% (-24)	—	—	—	—
2	Northwest Eaton (0-0) 1456	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
3	Red Oak (0-0) 1605	37% (-5)	—	—	—	—
4	@Arlington Sam Houston (0-0) 659	97% (+33)	—	—	—	—
5	Arlington Lamar (0-0) 1658	32% (-7)	—	—	—	—
7	@Granbury (0-0) 811	94% (+27)	—	—	—	—
8	#22Aledo (0-0) 2165	5% (-28)	—	—	—	—
9	@Arlington Bowie (0-0) 1696	28% (-9)	—	—	—	—
10	@Arlington Martin (0-0) 1633	34% (-6)	—	—	—	—
11	Weatherford (0-0) 1179	78% (+12)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 3-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		22	Aledo (6) Bearcats	86.6 2165	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2		75	Arlington Bowie (7) Volunteers	79.6 1696	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.8-2.2	88.7%	D2
3		84	Arlington Lamar (5) Vikings	79 1658	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	83.7%	D1
4		86	Arlington Martin (2) Warriors	78.6 1633	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.5-2.5	79.6%	D1
5		124	Arlington (3) Colts	76.2 1475	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	42.6%	—
6		182	Weatherford (4) Kangaroos	71.8 1179	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	5.4%	—
7		226	Granbury (8) Pirates	66.2 811	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		241	Arlington Sam Houston (1) Texans	63.9 659	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.5-6.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Arlington’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2019

9-4

Rating 675 (91st)

#2 · 2009

10-3

Rating 664 (90th)

#3 · 2018

11-1

Rating 657 (89th)

#4 · 2017

10-3

Rating 656 (89th)

#5 · 2020

5-5

Rating 633 (85th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	6-4	1409	31.0	24.4	+6.6	1260	−4.8	−2.6	−2.1	1447	−2.38	+0.73	−3.11	508(47th)
2024	7-4	1416	38.0	31.9	+6.1	1302	+2.1	+4.8	−2.7	1432	−2.24	+0.65	−2.90	507(47th)
2023	4-7	1366	25.3	29.8	−4.5	1454	−5.1	+2.3	−7.3	1317	−4.33	+0.26	−4.59	490(41st)
2022	6-5	1577	30.5	28.5	+1.9	1587	+3.3	−1.6	+4.9	1622	−1.89	+0.97	−2.87	543(60th)
2021	4-7	1630	32.8	40.5	−7.7	1695	+7.2	+8.3	−1.2	1471	−2.75	+0.95	−3.70	523(53rd)
2020	5-5	1939	32.5	28.3	+4.2	1823	+11.6	−6.6	+18.2	1954	−0.30	+1.66	−1.96	633(85th)
2019	9-4	2070	41.2	19.2	+22.1	1661	+15.1	−13.4	+28.5	2212	+0.88	+1.96	−1.07	675(91st)
2018	11-1	2121	44.1	21.4	+22.7	1552	+14.9	−9.4	+24.3	2108	+2.91	+3.38	−0.47	657(89th)
2017	10-3	2077	37.8	24.1	+13.7	1713	+13.5	−9.2	+22.7	2068	+2.67	+3.21	−0.54	656(89th)
2016	6-5	1738	33.1	33.9	−0.8	1693	+7.9	−0.6	+8.6	1714	+0.32	+1.88	−1.56	568(68th)
2015	5-6	1534	39.6	35.4	+4.3	1599	+11.8	+1.8	+10.0	1750	−2.27	+0.38	−2.65	553(63rd)
2014	4-6	1480	30.7	31.9	−1.2	1458	−1.5	−0.9	−0.6	1485	−3.14	+0.21	−3.36	514(50th)
2013	6-5	1637	31.0	22.6	+8.4	1474	+2.6	−5.9	+8.5	1713	−1.39	+1.61	−3.01	560(65th)
2012	10-3	1909	33.7	20.8	+12.8	1539	+6.6	−8.1	+14.6	1866	+1.76	+2.54	−0.78	606(79th)
2011	6-5	1741	40.4	27.6	+12.7	1601	+13.7	−2.3	+15.9	1898	−0.92	+1.47	−2.40	598(77th)
2010	7-4	1837	41.6	32.2	+9.5	1567	+13.6	+2.3	+11.4	1784	−0.24	+0.99	−1.23	591(75th)
2009	10-3	2064	41.6	24.9	+16.7	1679	+16.2	−7.3	+23.5	2087	+2.01	+2.99	−0.98	664(90th)
2008	8-5	1657	30.3	32.0	−1.7	1619	+5.4	+1.3	+4.2	1605	−0.68	+1.28	−1.96	560(66th)
2007	4-6	1549	28.9	33.2	−4.3	1682	+6.7	+1.8	+4.9	1623	−2.36	+1.07	−3.43	545(60th)
2006	4-6	1473	31.0	30.0	+1.0	1594	+6.6	+0.4	+6.2	1655	−3.11	+0.65	−3.75	543(60th)
2005	7-4	1571	33.9	23.1	+10.8	1518	+6.7	−4.1	+10.8	1771	−1.33	+1.48	−2.81	569(68th)
2004	1-9	1112	22.5	32.0	−9.5	1628	−2.1	+6.8	−8.9	1278	−5.83	+0.19	−6.02	464(31st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.