← Back
CLASS 6A · District 8-6A

Irving Nimitz Vikings

Enrollment: 2,321 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 7
Rank
#247
was #247
Record
1-5
0-3 district
Elo
325
#247 of 249
OVR Grade
58.9
#247 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
60.8
#235 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
56.1
#238 of 249 in 6A
Perf
441
#242 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Dallas Bryan Adams
 77% (+11) L 35-42 154 −16.4 +37.4 — −1.00
2
Fort Worth Polytechnic
 66% (+6) W 70-0 1855 +14.1 −0.1 +0.00 —
3
@South Garland (2-4) 442
 57% (+3) L 14-28 -92 −39.2 +24.4 — −1.00
5
Hurst Bell (3-3) 1286
 < 2% (-39) L 7-58 212 −16.3 +35.3 — −0.90
6
Fort Worth Haltom (3-3) 1404
 < 2% (-39) L 0-56 96 −26.1 +30.1 — −0.90
7
@Grand Prairie (3-3) 962
 7% (-25) L 0-14 418 −37.1 +6.2 — −0.98
8
Euless Trinity (4-2) 1869
 < 2% (-62) — — — — — —
9
@Irving MacArthur (3-3) 1027
 5% (-28) — — — — — —
10
South Grand Prairie (4-2) 1730
 < 2% (-56) — — — — — —
11
@Irving (0-6) 436
 39% (-4) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 8-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 58
Trojans
82.2
1869
 4-2 3-0 30.5 19.3 6.8-0.2 > 98% D1
2 79
Warriors
80.1
1730
 4-2 2-1 30.2 20.2 5.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 144
Buffaloes
75.2
1404
 3-3 3-0 31.3 19.7 5.2-1.9 > 98% D2
4 166
Blue Raiders
73.4
1286
 3-3 2-1 28.5 15.0 3.9-3.1 84% D2
5 204
Cardinals
69.5
1027
 3-3 1-2 28.2 29.3 2.9-4.1 16.7% —
6 209
Gophers
68.5
962
 3-3 1-2 14.8 27.3 2.4-4.6 < 2% —
7 246
Tigers
60.5
436
 0-6 0-3 8.2 54.7 0.8-6.2 < 2% —
8 247
Vikings
58.9
325
 1-5 0-3 21.0 33.0 0.4-6.6 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Irving Nimitz’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005
6-4
Rating 567 (68th)
#2 · 2004
3-7
Rating 538 (58th)
#3 · 2010
6-5
Rating 530 (55th)
#4 · 2009
7-4
Rating 517 (51st)
#5 · 2015
6-5
Rating 487 (39th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 0-10 404 15.5 51.1 −35.6 1119 −20.8 +31.3 −52.1 197 −9.09 0.00 −9.09 250(1st)
2024 1-9 624 12.6 32.3 −19.7 1108 −24.2 +11.2 −35.5 613 −7.77 +0.02 −7.79 327(5th)
2023 1-9 673 17.7 43.4 −25.7 1293 −14.6 +18.6 −33.2 670 −7.11 +0.00 −7.11 342(6th)
2022 1-9 702 15.4 49.1 −33.7 1350 −14.9 +24.3 −39.2 519 −6.57 +0.01 −6.58 317(4th)
2021 5-6 1181 25.7 23.5 +2.2 1304 −7.1 −1.9 −5.2 1369 −3.64 +0.17 −3.81 470(33rd)
2020 3-6 1070 21.0 30.1 −9.1 1200 −13.8 +7.9 −21.8 956 −4.55 +0.07 −4.62 401(15th)
2019 2-8 927 16.4 38.9 −22.5 1384 −14.6 +12.3 −26.9 826 −5.63 +0.02 −5.66 376(11th)
2018 4-6 1092 26.8 30.3 −3.5 1394 −3.0 +5.5 −8.6 1286 −3.72 +0.12 −3.84 452(28th)
2017 1-9 851 18.0 37.1 −19.1 1591 −4.8 +10.6 −15.3 1117 −5.59 +0.01 −5.60 408(17th)
2016 2-8 1078 22.3 40.2 −17.9 1609 −5.1 +8.6 −13.7 1158 −4.97 +0.03 −5.00 435(23rd)
2015 6-5 1365 23.5 21.5 +2.1 1310 −7.8 −2.4 −5.4 1365 −2.42 +0.25 −2.67 487(39th)
2014 5-6 1334 27.5 27.8 −0.3 1280 −5.5 +0.2 −5.7 1357 −3.42 +0.15 −3.57 484(38th)
2013 4-6 1260 17.1 25.5 −8.4 1378 −13.1 +0.2 −13.2 1170 −3.49 +0.29 −3.78 453(29th)
2012 2-8 927 17.6 36.3 −18.7 1455 −13.7 +7.3 −21.0 974 −5.61 +0.03 −5.64 399(15th)
2011 2-8 1010 14.4 33.9 −19.5 1536 −11.7 +6.3 −18.0 1050 −5.38 +0.32 −5.70 418(19th)
2010 6-5 1606 27.3 29.8 −2.5 1529 +0.6 +1.4 −0.8 1480 −2.07 +1.04 −3.11 530(55th)
2009 7-4 1475 19.2 21.2 −2.0 1547 −6.4 −5.8 −0.6 1485 −0.80 +1.01 −1.80 517(51st)
2008 1-9 858 19.2 36.7 −17.5 1421 −9.3 +11.2 −20.5 988 −6.75 +0.06 −6.81 397(14th)
2007 0-10 1039 13.2 32.6 −19.4 1633 −7.9 +6.0 −13.9 1152 −6.75 0.00 −6.75 437(24th)
2006 3-7 1419 8.5 24.6 −16.1 1610 −13.3 −2.0 −11.3 1216 −3.88 +0.40 −4.28 479(36th)
2005 6-4 1691 23.4 20.7 +2.7 1613 +0.4 −6.7 +7.2 1679 −0.57 +0.97 −1.54 567(68th)
2004 3-7 1504 19.8 23.0 −3.2 1643 −3.2 −6.0 +2.8 1569 −3.53 +0.29 −3.82 538(58th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.