← Back

CLASS 6A · District 8-6A

Hurst Bell Blue Raiders

Enrollment: 3,203 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3

Rank

#173

was #173

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1252

#173 of 249

OVR Grade

72.9

#173 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Garland Rowlett (0-0) 1534	23% (-11)	—	—	—	—
2	Plano West (0-0) 1440	31% (-8)	—	—	—	—
3	@Garland Sachse (0-0) 1529	24% (-11)	—	—	—	—
5	@Irving Nimitz (0-0) 487	96% (+31)	—	—	—	—
6	Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	88% (+19)	—	—	—	—
7	@Fort Worth Haltom (0-0) 1386	36% (-5)	—	—	—	—
8	Irving (0-0) 522	95% (+29)	—	—	—	—
9	@South Grand Prairie (0-0) 1816	9% (-23)	—	—	—	—
10	Irving MacArthur (0-0) 1019	73% (+9)	—	—	—	—
11	@Euless Trinity (0-0) 1856	7% (-24)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 8-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		53	Euless Trinity (1) Trojans	82 1856	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		60	South Grand Prairie (2) Warriors	81.4 1816	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3		147	Fort Worth Haltom (5) Buffaloes	74.9 1386	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	92.1%	D2
4		173	Hurst Bell (3) Blue Raiders	72.9 1252	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	79.1%	D2
5		204	Irving MacArthur (6) Cardinals	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	24.9%	—
6		229	Grand Prairie (4) Gophers	65.5 766	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	3.4%	—
7		245	Irving (8) Tigers	61.8 522	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		247	Irving Nimitz (7) Vikings	61.3 487	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Hurst Bell’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2010

6-5

Rating 578 (71st)

#2 · 2011

6-5

Rating 572 (70th)

#3 · 2008

7-4

Rating 571 (69th)

#4 · 2012

7-4

Rating 560 (65th)

#5 · 2013

7-4

Rating 542 (59th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-5	1379	23.7	30.6	−6.9	1562	−4.8	−1.4	−3.4	1416	−1.46	+0.84	−2.30	502(45th)
2024	2-8	1203	17.9	40.6	−22.7	1653	−8.8	+8.0	−16.9	1079	−3.76	+0.12	−3.89	441(25th)
2023	7-3	1470	29.4	19.1	+10.3	1267	−6.0	−6.7	+0.8	1519	−0.96	+0.85	−1.81	527(54th)
2022	6-4	1352	27.7	19.5	+8.2	1309	−4.3	−5.3	+1.0	1524	−2.14	+0.34	−2.48	510(48th)
2021	2-8	1025	13.3	32.1	−18.8	1392	−18.8	+2.9	−21.6	959	−6.00	+0.04	−6.05	401(15th)
2020	2-7	1120	12.4	27.4	−15.0	1327	−17.2	+4.5	−21.7	958	−5.42	+0.18	−5.60	405(16th)
2019	3-7	1156	18.1	29.4	−11.3	1567	−10.3	−1.0	−9.3	1268	−3.95	+0.50	−4.46	455(29th)
2018	1-9	1081	13.3	30.6	−17.3	1689	−10.4	−0.6	−9.9	1253	−4.81	+0.09	−4.90	447(27th)
2017	1-9	1149	20.2	41.1	−20.9	1822	−0.8	+7.8	−8.7	1283	−4.97	+0.05	−5.03	468(32nd)
2016	3-7	1462	17.6	30.5	−12.9	1698	−7.2	−2.9	−4.2	1394	−2.08	+0.58	−2.66	501(44th)
2015	1-9	1132	14.8	40.2	−25.4	1754	−9.2	+7.0	−16.3	1093	−4.21	+0.02	−4.23	433(23rd)
2014	1-9	1252	14.3	42.2	−27.9	1867	−7.0	+5.3	−12.3	1193	−4.09	+0.01	−4.11	469(33rd)
2013	7-4	1612	27.7	20.3	+7.5	1408	−1.8	−5.7	+3.8	1596	−0.83	+0.71	−1.54	542(59th)
2012	7-4	1547	32.9	19.0	+13.9	1443	+3.7	−7.2	+10.8	1771	−1.14	+0.67	−1.82	560(65th)
2011	6-5	1668	31.1	22.8	+8.3	1615	+5.2	−5.2	+10.4	1761	−1.08	+0.62	−1.70	572(70th)
2010	6-5	1626	30.0	21.0	+9.0	1617	+4.8	−8.4	+13.1	1829	−1.16	+0.93	−2.10	578(71st)
2009	3-7	1221	18.5	27.1	−8.6	1489	−10.4	+0.7	−11.1	1223	−4.95	+0.13	−5.08	459(30th)
2008	7-4	1730	29.5	22.9	+6.5	1561	+4.2	−3.8	+8.1	1701	−0.39	+0.82	−1.21	571(69th)
2007	6-5	1530	24.2	26.5	−2.4	1588	+2.2	0.0	+2.2	1554	−1.56	+0.62	−2.18	535(57th)
2006	6-5	1655	19.6	22.2	−2.5	1557	−4.3	−4.0	−0.3	1493	−1.48	+1.17	−2.64	538(58th)
2005	3-7	1342	15.9	28.3	−12.4	1680	−5.6	−1.2	−4.4	1389	−3.18	+0.54	−3.72	497(43rd)
2004	3-7	1398	19.8	26.7	−6.9	1580	−3.9	−0.8	−3.1	1423	−4.01	+0.49	−4.51	508(48th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.