← Back

CLASS 6A · District 8-6A

South Grand Prairie Warriors

Enrollment: 3,358 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#60

was #60

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1816

#60 of 249

OVR Grade

81.4

#60 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Keller Timber Creek (0-0) 1477	80% (+14)	—	—	—	—
2	@Arlington Bowie (0-0) 1696	62% (+5)	—	—	—	—
3	Plano East (0-0) 1352	87% (+19)	—	—	—	—
5	Irving MacArthur (0-0) 1019	97% (+32)	—	—	—	—
6	Euless Trinity (0-0) 1856	46% (-2)	—	—	—	—
7	@Irving (0-0) 522	> 98% (+52)	—	—	—	—
8	@Fort Worth Haltom (0-0) 1386	86% (+17)	—	—	—	—
9	Hurst Bell (0-0) 1252	91% (+23)	—	—	—	—
10	@Irving Nimitz (0-0) 487	> 98% (+53)	—	—	—	—
11	@Grand Prairie (0-0) 766	> 98% (+42)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 8-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		53	Euless Trinity (1) Trojans	82 1856	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.3-0.7	> 98%	D1
2		60	South Grand Prairie (2) Warriors	81.4 1816	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
3		147	Fort Worth Haltom (5) Buffaloes	74.9 1386	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.6-2.4	92.1%	D2
4		173	Hurst Bell (3) Blue Raiders	72.9 1252	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-3	79.1%	D2
5		204	Irving MacArthur (6) Cardinals	69.3 1019	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.1-3.9	24.9%	—
6		229	Grand Prairie (4) Gophers	65.5 766	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-5	3.4%	—
7		245	Irving (8) Tigers	61.8 522	0-0	0-0	—	—	1-6	< 2%	—
8		247	Irving Nimitz (7) Vikings	61.3 487	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how South Grand Prairie’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2005

10-2

Rating 665 (90th)

#2 · 2015

7-5

Rating 657 (89th)

#3 · 2020

6-3

Rating 654 (88th)

#4 · 2014

5-6

Rating 630 (84th)

#5 · 2006

10-2

Rating 627 (84th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	8-2	1718	46.8	16.8	+30.0	1283	+11.2	−9.1	+20.3	2007	−0.39	+0.87	−1.26	616(81st)
2024	6-5	1426	34.9	31.4	+3.5	1303	+0.8	+5.8	−5.0	1375	−3.15	+0.35	−3.50	501(44th)
2023	3-8	1306	28.2	34.5	−6.4	1566	−1.8	+3.7	−5.4	1364	−4.98	+0.16	−5.14	491(41st)
2022	6-6	1850	33.9	23.8	+10.2	1708	+9.9	−8.7	+18.6	1966	−1.31	+1.19	−2.50	614(81st)
2021	7-4	1887	29.1	24.6	+4.5	1683	+2.9	−8.5	+11.5	1786	−0.15	+1.47	−1.62	589(75th)
2020	6-3	2019	23.2	18.1	+5.1	1888	+1.6	−18.4	+20.0	2000	+1.95	+2.56	−0.61	654(88th)
2019	5-6	1754	23.1	26.5	−3.4	1829	+1.5	−9.6	+11.1	1778	−0.80	+1.14	−1.95	588(74th)
2018	5-6	1808	19.2	23.4	−4.2	1843	−0.5	−9.8	+9.3	1732	−0.89	+1.28	−2.17	588(74th)
2017	7-5	1901	22.5	18.5	+4.0	1839	+2.6	−14.5	+17.1	1928	+0.69	+1.68	−0.98	623(83rd)
2016	6-5	1777	26.5	22.1	+4.5	1775	+1.9	−14.1	+16.0	1899	−0.37	+1.31	−1.68	602(78th)
2015	7-5	1993	29.6	28.0	+1.6	1965	+9.7	−9.2	+18.9	1972	+1.80	+2.62	−0.83	657(89th)
2014	5-6	1802	31.6	31.5	+0.2	2029	+10.4	−8.7	+19.1	1976	+0.25	+1.37	−1.12	630(84th)
2013	4-6	1708	21.9	25.5	−3.6	1896	+0.5	−11.2	+11.8	1794	−1.12	+0.98	−2.10	594(76th)
2012	5-5	1734	28.8	28.5	+0.3	1799	+5.4	−8.0	+13.4	1836	−0.09	+1.73	−1.82	593(76th)
2011	4-6	1442	26.0	30.7	−4.7	1616	−0.9	−1.5	+0.5	1513	−3.17	+0.37	−3.54	519(52nd)
2010	6-5	1520	30.2	23.3	+6.9	1561	+2.6	−7.7	+10.3	1756	−1.88	+0.70	−2.58	559(65th)
2009	4-6	1296	26.1	32.2	−6.1	1509	−0.3	+5.7	−6.0	1351	−3.72	+0.67	−4.39	483(38th)
2008	7-4	1697	19.1	17.1	+2.0	1593	−4.4	−10.8	+6.4	1659	−0.63	+1.17	−1.80	567(68th)
2007	3-7	1735	17.1	18.3	−1.2	1648	−3.5	−8.8	+5.3	1633	−3.71	+0.56	−4.28	565(67th)
2006	10-2	2004	32.8	21.6	+11.3	1645	+10.2	−7.1	+17.3	1933	+1.95	+2.41	−0.47	627(84th)
2005	10-2	2129	30.7	17.3	+13.3	1734	+10.2	−13.3	+23.4	2086	+3.55	+3.99	−0.43	665(90th)
2004	6-4	1674	28.2	20.6	+7.6	1638	+5.5	−9.0	+14.5	1863	−1.05	+1.28	−2.33	592(75th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.