← Back

CLASS 6A · District 15-6A

Klein Forest Golden Eagles

Enrollment: 3,243 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 5

Rank

#181

was #178

Record

1-6

1-4 district

Elo

1176

#181 of 249

OVR Grade

71.7

#181 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

67.7

#198 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

63.8

#214 of 249 in 6A

Perf

911

#209 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@Aldine Eisenhower (3-3) 1292	58% (+3)	L 16-20	1077	−13.1	+3.8	—	−0.93
2	Humble (1-6) 1472	32% (-7)	L 13-45	708	−16.0	+15.6	—	−0.85
3	@#35Tomball (5-1) 2056	3% (-33)	L 19-49	1322	+3.0	+10.1	—	−0.33
4	Magnolia West (2-4) 1221	41% (-4)	W 43-42	1093	+3.6	+19.9	+0.08	—
5	@Klein Collins (5-2) 1934	3% (-32)	L 0-49	867	−19.6	+5.7	—	−0.33
6	#27Klein (7-0) 2118	3% (-33)	L 0-52	804	−11.3	+16.5	—	−0.31
7	@Klein Oak (2-4) 1730	11% (-20)	L 0-59	507	−18.9	+20.8	—	−0.65
8	Tomball Memorial (1-5) 1362	31% (-7)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	@Magnolia (3-4) 1857	5% (-27)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	Klein Cain (4-2) 1818	6% (-26)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 15-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		27	Klein (3) Bearkats	85.9 2118	7-0	5-0	35.3	9.3	7.2-0.8	> 98%	D1
2		52	Klein Collins (4) Tigers	83.2 1934	5-2	4-1	40.1	24.4	6-2	97.3%	D1
3		35	Tomball (6) Cougars	85 2056	5-1	3-1	38.8	15.8	5.9-2.1	85.4%	D2
4		59	Magnolia (9) Bulldogs	82 1857	3-4	3-2	28.6	24.7	4.8-3.2	61.9%	D2
5		64	Klein Cain (1) Hurricanes	81.4 1818	4-2	2-2	39.7	30.5	4.8-3.1	44.2%	—
6		79	Klein Oak (2) Panthers	80.1 1730	2-4	2-2	34.0	23.3	3.8-4.2	11.1%	—
7		149	Tomball Memorial (7) Wildcats	74.5 1362	1-5	0-4	15.7	43.7	1.5-6.5	< 2%	—
8		181	Klein Forest (5) Golden Eagles	71.7 1176	1-6	1-4	13.0	45.1	1.4-6.6	< 2%	—
9		172	Magnolia West (8) Mustangs	72.4 1221	2-4	0-4	23.8	39.0	0.5-7.5	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Klein Forest’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2009

7-4

Rating 626 (84th)

#2 · 2007

9-3

Rating 620 (82nd)

#3 · 2008

9-2

Rating 612 (81st)

#4 · 2011

6-4

Rating 595 (76th)

#5 · 2006

9-3

Rating 590 (75th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	2-8	1305	25.9	43.5	−17.6	1701	−1.3	+7.5	−8.8	1281	−3.66	+0.38	−4.04	477(35th)
2024	2-8	1291	12.5	29.0	−16.5	1646	−13.9	−4.0	−9.9	1252	−4.27	+0.29	−4.56	472(34th)
2023	4-6	1491	18.5	27.3	−8.8	1616	−5.0	−3.5	−1.5	1463	−2.82	+0.38	−3.21	521(52nd)
2022	5-5	1513	24.0	18.8	+5.2	1641	−1.8	−12.7	+10.9	1772	−1.70	+1.15	−2.85	557(64th)
2021	5-5	1411	33.8	30.1	+3.7	1475	+3.2	+1.2	+2.0	1550	−1.73	+0.39	−2.12	515(50th)
2020	1-7	816	18.1	42.5	−24.4	1685	−8.3	+7.4	−15.7	1107	−4.06	+0.02	−4.08	398(15th)
2019	0-10	707	17.9	44.6	−26.7	1630	−6.0	+14.3	−20.4	991	−6.84	0.00	−6.84	378(11th)
2018	1-9	830	21.3	43.2	−21.9	1575	−4.6	+13.4	−17.9	1052	−5.82	+0.04	−5.85	398(15th)
2017	2-7	1072	22.8	33.3	−10.6	1460	−2.4	+10.1	−12.5	1188	−4.45	+0.02	−4.47	438(24th)
2016	3-7	1228	23.8	30.9	−7.1	1441	−3.4	+5.9	−9.3	1267	−4.68	+0.12	−4.80	463(31st)
2015	1-9	1200	14.7	36.3	−21.6	1845	−4.6	+2.9	−7.5	1312	−3.79	+0.16	−3.95	477(36th)
2014	1-9	1254	17.1	39.1	−22.0	1903	−1.2	+4.8	−6.0	1351	−3.88	+0.36	−4.24	493(42nd)
2013	2-8	1291	14.2	31.4	−17.2	1799	−6.9	−2.2	−4.7	1383	−3.25	+0.25	−3.50	492(41st)
2012	1-9	1264	19.9	43.7	−23.8	1830	−4.3	+6.0	−10.3	1242	−4.59	+0.94	−5.53	475(35th)
2011	6-4	1694	29.9	30.8	−0.9	1868	+9.5	−3.1	+12.6	1815	+0.54	+2.08	−1.54	595(76th)
2010	2-8	1478	21.5	34.0	−12.5	1791	+1.1	+1.5	−0.4	1490	−3.23	+0.12	−3.35	526(54th)
2009	7-4	1890	40.4	28.0	+12.4	1711	+17.6	−3.4	+20.9	2023	+0.01	+1.81	−1.81	626(84th)
2008	9-2	1925	22.9	15.9	+7.0	1600	0.0	−11.1	+11.2	1779	+1.87	+2.78	−0.91	612(81st)
2007	9-3	1912	20.3	15.7	+4.7	1693	+0.5	−11.5	+12.0	1800	+1.38	+2.46	−1.08	620(82nd)
2006	9-3	1830	25.2	18.6	+6.6	1565	+2.1	−8.4	+10.4	1760	+0.36	+1.35	−0.99	590(75th)
2005	8-3	1780	26.2	19.8	+6.4	1547	+3.4	−5.1	+8.5	1714	+0.46	+1.36	−0.90	580(71st)
2004	5-5	1642	26.3	20.8	+5.5	1515	+2.5	−5.2	+7.7	1693	−2.32	+0.44	−2.76	567(68th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.