← Back

CLASS 6A · District 15-6A

Klein Oak Panthers

Enrollment: 3,645 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2

Rank

#37

was #37

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

1959

#37 of 249

OVR Grade

83.5

#37 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	@Conroe Grand Oaks (0-0) 1830	63% (+5)	—	—	—	—
2	#43The Woodlands (0-0) 1934	53% (+1)	—	—	—	—
3	@Klein (0-0) 1882	58% (+3)	—	—	—	—
5	Tomball Memorial (0-0) 1505	87% (+18)	—	—	—	—
6	@Magnolia (0-0) 1863	60% (+4)	—	—	—	—
7	Klein Forest (0-0) 1329	93% (+25)	—	—	—	—
8	@Klein Cain (0-0) 1785	67% (+7)	—	—	—	—
9	#40Tomball (0-0) 1941	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
10	@Magnolia West (0-0) 1164	97% (+32)	—	—	—	—
11	#42Klein Collins (0-0) 1936	52% (+1)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 15-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		37	Klein Oak (2) Panthers	83.5 1959	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.7-2.3	81.3%	D1
2		40	Tomball (6) Cougars	83.3 1941	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-2.5	77.4%	D2
3		42	Klein Collins (4) Tigers	83.2 1936	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.5-2.5	77.6%	D2
4		51	Klein (3) Bearkats	82.4 1882	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.1-2.9	65.2%	D1
5		52	Magnolia (9) Bulldogs	82.1 1863	0-0	0-0	—	—	5-3	57.4%	—
6		64	Klein Cain (1) Hurricanes	80.9 1785	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.4-3.6	37.4%	—
7		114	Tomball Memorial (7) Wildcats	76.7 1505	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.5-5.5	3.2%	—
8		160	Klein Forest (5) Golden Eagles	74 1329	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.5-6.5	< 2%	—
9		186	Magnolia West (8) Mustangs	71.5 1164	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.8-7.2	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Klein Oak’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2010

8-4

Rating 697 (94th)

#2 · 2014

10-4

Rating 697 (94th)

#3 · 2011

9-4

Rating 687 (92nd)

#4 · 2008

10-2

Rating 665 (90th)

#5 · 2021

6-6

Rating 650 (88th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-5	1733	30.3	29.6	+0.7	1814	+3.6	−9.8	+13.5	1837	−0.10	+2.07	−2.17	599(77th)
2024	6-5	1749	27.0	26.7	+0.3	1755	+3.0	−7.4	+10.4	1761	−0.54	+2.05	−2.60	584(73rd)
2023	4-6	1423	22.5	25.2	−2.7	1705	−0.7	−6.7	+6.0	1650	−2.19	+0.92	−3.11	540(59th)
2022	3-6	1398	23.1	32.9	−9.8	1719	−2.3	−1.3	−1.1	1473	−3.06	+0.69	−3.75	507(47th)
2021	6-6	1951	29.8	31.7	−1.8	2007	+9.6	−9.1	+18.7	1968	+0.38	+1.79	−1.41	650(88th)
2020	4-5	1954	23.8	21.2	+2.6	1799	+0.8	−16.2	+17.1	1927	−0.70	+1.75	−2.46	628(84th)
2019	10-3	2151	28.6	17.6	+11.0	1599	+3.5	−12.7	+16.2	1905	+2.05	+3.60	−1.55	645(86th)
2018	10-3	2015	31.7	20.5	+11.2	1674	+6.0	−12.8	+18.8	1970	+1.83	+2.20	−0.37	627(84th)
2017	7-4	1799	25.1	18.4	+6.7	1572	+1.3	−8.8	+10.1	1752	+0.36	+1.16	−0.79	580(72nd)
2016	7-4	1743	40.0	25.4	+14.6	1506	+12.4	−1.7	+14.1	1852	−0.84	+0.87	−1.71	587(74th)
2015	6-5	1874	28.1	29.9	−1.8	1831	+8.3	−4.1	+12.4	1811	+0.42	+1.82	−1.39	604(78th)
2014	10-4	2219	33.7	27.1	+6.6	1912	+14.5	−9.2	+23.7	2093	+3.28	+4.40	−1.13	697(94th)
2013	5-5	1886	27.0	26.1	+0.9	1733	+4.9	−6.8	+11.7	1793	−0.39	+1.89	−2.28	594(76th)
2012	3-7	1671	37.3	42.7	−5.4	1790	+11.8	+5.7	+6.1	1652	−3.27	+0.63	−3.90	562(66th)
2011	9-4	2214	34.6	24.1	+10.5	1850	+14.1	−11.0	+25.1	2127	+3.46	+4.51	−1.05	687(92nd)
2010	8-4	2189	31.6	24.1	+7.5	1945	+12.0	−12.1	+24.0	2100	+2.31	+3.69	−1.38	697(94th)
2009	4-6	1784	23.2	29.2	−6.0	1753	+0.7	−4.5	+5.2	1630	−2.28	+0.92	−3.20	568(68th)
2008	10-2	2115	33.2	19.1	+14.2	1681	+11.1	−11.0	+22.0	2051	+2.50	+3.44	−0.94	665(90th)
2007	10-2	2008	33.9	19.0	+14.9	1525	+10.8	−6.0	+16.8	1920	+2.14	+2.66	−0.53	638(85th)
2006	8-6	1806	32.3	25.9	+6.4	1607	+9.3	−1.1	+10.3	1758	−1.15	+1.59	−2.74	602(78th)
2005	3-0	1685	37.0	20.0	+17.0	1219	+9.3	+0.3	+8.9	1723	+0.56	+0.56	0.00	—
2004	2-1	1411	24.7	24.7	0.0	1316	−1.7	+2.9	−4.6	1385	−0.54	+0.39	−0.93	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.