← Back
CLASS 6A · District 15-6A

Tomball Cougars

Enrollment: 3,013 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#40
was #40
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1941
#40 of 249
OVR Grade
83.3
#40 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
DEF Grade
Perf

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1 90% (+21)
2
@Katy Cinco Ranch (0-0) 1726
71% (+9)
3
Klein Forest (0-0) 1329
93% (+24)
4
@Klein Cain (0-0) 1785
66% (+6)
6
Magnolia West (0-0) 1164
96% (+31)
7
@#42Klein Collins (0-0) 1936
50% (+0)
8
Klein (0-0) 1882
56% (+2)
9
@#37Klein Oak (0-0) 1959
48% (-1)
10
@Tomball Memorial (0-0) 1505
86% (+17)
11
@Magnolia (0-0) 1863
58% (+3)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 15-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 37
Panthers
83.5
1959
0-0 0-0 5.7-2.3 81.3% D1
2 40
Cougars
83.3
1941
0-0 0-0 5.5-2.5 77.4% D2
3 42
Tigers
83.2
1936
0-0 0-0 5.5-2.5 77.6% D2
4 51
Bearkats
82.4
1882
0-0 0-0 5.1-2.9 65.2% D1
5 52
Bulldogs
82.1
1863
0-0 0-0 5-3 57.4%
6 64
Hurricanes
80.9
1785
0-0 0-0 4.4-3.6 37.4%
7 114
Wildcats
76.7
1505
0-0 0-0 2.5-5.5 3.2%
8 160
Golden Eagles
74
1329
0-0 0-0 1.5-6.5 < 2%
9 186
Mustangs
71.5
1164
0-0 0-0 0.8-7.2 < 2%
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Tomball’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2021
11-4
Rating 687 (92nd)
#2 · 2025
9-3
Rating 656 (88th)
#3 · 2024
10-2
Rating 626 (83rd)
#4 · 2010
10-3
Rating 623 (83rd)
#5 · 2023
8-5
Rating 614 (81st)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo
PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS
AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 9-3 2063 40.0 27.2 +12.8 1745 +12.4 −9.9 +22.3 2057 +2.18 +2.84 −0.66 656(88th)
2024 10-2 1983 32.6 24.5 +8.1 1687 +6.3 −10.6 +17.0 1924 +2.62 +3.00 −0.37 626(83rd)
2023 8-5 1813 26.0 19.5 +6.5 1691 +2.5 −12.6 +15.0 1876 −0.10 +2.29 −2.38 614(81st)
2022 8-5 1882 26.5 28.0 −1.5 1733 +3.1 −5.7 +8.8 1719 +0.47 +2.47 −2.00 595(76th)
2021 11-4 2241 36.5 25.0 +11.5 1750 +12.4 −11.4 +23.8 2095 +2.54 +4.00 −1.46 687(92nd)
2020 7-3 1610 31.7 29.1 +2.6 1556 +4.2 −2.8 +6.9 1673 +0.73 +1.61 −0.88 545(60th)
2019 0-1 1168 14.0 48.0 −34.0 2002 −9.7 +5.7 −15.5 1113 −0.70 0.00 −0.70
2018 0-1 1179 18.0 41.0 −23.0 1652 −6.7 +3.3 −10.0 1249 −0.94 0.00 −0.94
2017 1-0 1319 49.0 14.0 +35.0 938 +16.7 −0.7 +17.4 1936 +0.04 +0.04 0.00
2015 1-0 1195 42.0 35.0 +7.0 648 +4.0 +19.4 −15.3 1117 +0.01 +0.01 0.00
2014 1-0 1164 35.0 7.0 +28.0 894 −0.2 −6.0 +5.8 1646 +0.02 +0.02 0.00
2013 1-2 1074 13.3 35.7 −22.3 1427 −12.2 +12.3 −24.5 887 −1.60 +0.02 −1.62
2012 0-3 1058 19.7 42.7 −23.0 1316 −13.8 +12.3 −26.2 846 −2.67 0.00 −2.67
2011 1-8 1289 22.7 35.0 −12.3 1837 +0.2 −0.4 +0.6 1515 −4.89 +0.58 −5.47 516(51st)
2010 10-3 1909 29.0 17.8 +11.2 1591 +4.3 −11.4 +15.6 1890 +1.83 +2.75 −0.92 623(83rd)
2009 2-8 1221 20.4 31.5 −11.1 1706 −3.1 −0.3 −2.8 1429 −4.29 +0.42 −4.71 487(39th)
2008 2-7 1126 22.4 33.9 −11.4 1634 +0.6 +7.1 −6.5 1338 −3.55 +0.57 −4.12 468(32nd)
2007 1-9 1089 8.9 29.0 −20.1 1643 −11.8 +2.1 −13.9 1152 −5.35 +0.05 −5.40 441(25th)
2006 2-8 1176 13.1 31.5 −18.4 1581 −10.8 +4.2 −15.0 1126 −5.15 +0.10 −5.26 446(26th)
2005 5-5 1445 21.5 21.6 −0.1 1415 −2.4 −0.8 −1.6 1460 −2.79 +0.95 −3.74 515(50th)
2004 5-5 1328 23.2 20.4 +2.8 1458 −2.3 −2.0 −0.3 1492 −3.44 +0.51 −3.95 511(48th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.