← Back
CLASS 6A · District 15-6A

Klein Bearkats

Enrollment: 3,526 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 3
Rank
#27
was #38
Record
7-0
5-0 district
Elo
2118
#27 of 249
OVR Grade
85.9
#27 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
80.2
#76 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
89.9
#20 of 249 in 6A
Perf
2124
#35 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
Jersey Village (1-5) 923
 > 98% (+42) W 22-3 1807 −2.7 −15.0 +0.01 —
2
@Aldine Eisenhower (3-3) 1292
 91% (+23) W 37-0 2102 +7.9 −16.2 +0.10 —
3
Klein Oak (2-4) 1730
 56% (+2) W 37-20 2407 +18.1 −18.2 +0.50 —
4
@Tomball Memorial (1-5) 1362
 91% (+22) W 34-7 1824 −2.3 −15.3 +0.16 —
5
Magnolia (3-4) 1857
 73% (+10) W 28-21 2044 +8.5 −13.3 +0.41 —
6
@Klein Forest (1-6) 1176
 97% (+33) W 52-0 2244 +12.0 −17.7 +0.06 —
7
Klein Cain (4-2) 1818
 66% (+6) W 37-14 2438 +10.6 −26.9 +0.54 —
8
@#35Tomball (5-1) 2056
 56% (+2) — — — — — —
9
Magnolia West (2-4) 1221
 98% (+36) — — — — — —
10
@Klein Collins (5-2) 1934
 68% (+7) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 15-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 27
Bearkats
85.9
2118
 7-0 5-0 35.3 9.3 7.2-0.8 > 98% D1
2 52
Tigers
83.2
1934
 5-2 4-1 40.1 24.4 6-2 97.3% D1
3 35
Cougars
85
2056
 5-1 3-1 38.8 15.8 5.9-2.1 85.4% D2
4 59
Bulldogs
82
1857
 3-4 3-2 28.6 24.7 4.8-3.2 61.9% D2
5 64
Hurricanes
81.4
1818
 4-2 2-2 39.7 30.5 4.8-3.1 44.2% —
6 79
Panthers
80.1
1730
 2-4 2-2 34.0 23.3 3.8-4.2 11.1% —
7 149
Wildcats
74.5
1362
 1-5 0-4 15.7 43.7 1.5-6.5 < 2% —
8 181
Golden Eagles
71.7
1176
 1-6 1-4 13.0 45.1 1.4-6.6 < 2% —
9 172
Mustangs
72.4
1221
 2-4 0-4 23.8 39.0 0.5-7.5 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Klein’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2009
11-4
Rating 678 (91st)
#2 · 2013
6-5
Rating 640 (86th)
#3 · 2025
6-5
Rating 620 (82nd)
#4 · 2010
8-4
Rating 611 (80th)
#5 · 2012
6-5
Rating 610 (80th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 6-5 1789 48.5 35.1 +13.5 1713 +20.8 −0.4 +21.2 2031 −0.55 +1.02 −1.57 620(82nd)
2024 6-4 1701 41.5 35.0 +6.5 1646 +13.5 +2.2 +11.3 1782 −0.52 +1.66 −2.18 579(71st)
2023 2-8 1127 23.6 28.0 −4.4 1600 −1.8 −1.6 −0.2 1495 −4.87 +0.22 −5.09 493(42nd)
2022 4-6 1599 28.7 28.3 +0.4 1628 +2.5 −3.0 +5.5 1638 −2.49 +0.88 −3.38 547(61st)
2021 4-6 1487 27.0 28.5 −1.5 1747 +2.0 −6.3 +8.3 1708 −2.45 +0.82 −3.27 545(60th)
2020 3-5 1522 29.4 27.8 +1.6 1676 +2.2 −6.6 +8.8 1721 −1.81 +0.70 −2.50 543(60th)
2019 5-5 1547 28.2 29.5 −1.3 1679 +4.5 −2.1 +6.7 1666 −1.64 +1.55 −3.18 544(60th)
2018 6-5 1668 32.7 26.0 +6.7 1695 +8.8 −5.9 +14.7 1867 −1.07 +1.35 −2.41 582(72nd)
2017 7-4 1746 31.1 15.1 +16.0 1523 +5.5 −10.7 +16.1 1904 −0.19 +1.55 −1.75 607(79th)
2016 7-4 1657 31.2 19.3 +11.9 1457 +3.6 −5.7 +9.3 1732 −0.74 +0.84 −1.58 564(66th)
2015 3-7 1466 16.2 31.8 −15.6 1876 −3.5 −3.5 0.0 1499 −2.04 +0.92 −2.96 530(55th)
2014 2-8 1462 18.2 28.2 −10.0 1834 −2.5 −6.5 +4.0 1599 −3.97 +0.29 −4.27 539(59th)
2013 6-5 2033 30.2 25.3 +4.9 1829 +10.5 −8.2 +18.6 1966 +0.34 +1.87 −1.53 640(86th)
2012 6-5 1854 32.5 31.3 +1.3 1815 +7.3 −7.3 +14.6 1865 +0.66 +2.16 −1.49 610(80th)
2011 4-6 1519 20.4 26.8 −6.4 1756 −2.6 −5.7 +3.1 1579 −2.40 +0.74 −3.14 538(58th)
2010 8-4 1847 25.8 21.2 +4.6 1723 +3.0 −10.8 +13.8 1844 +0.85 +2.62 −1.78 611(80th)
2009 11-4 2187 28.0 19.1 +8.9 1755 +7.1 −13.6 +20.8 2019 +2.61 +4.24 −1.63 678(91st)
2008 4-5 1735 23.8 21.3 +2.4 1688 +2.4 −7.1 +9.5 1738 −1.24 +0.52 −1.76 576(70th)
2007 7-5 1816 21.1 19.8 +1.3 1755 +2.3 −8.6 +10.9 1773 +0.21 +1.85 −1.64 592(76th)
2006 7-4 1879 28.1 23.9 +4.2 1733 +8.0 −6.4 +14.4 1860 +0.45 +1.70 −1.25 608(80th)
2005 5-5 1390 21.0 21.2 −0.2 1561 −1.4 −3.1 +1.8 1544 −2.08 +0.73 −2.81 521(53rd)
2004 4-6 1190 14.1 21.6 −7.5 1543 −10.2 −4.7 −5.5 1362 −2.96 +1.50 −4.46 481(37th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.