← Back

CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

La Joya Coyotes

Enrollment: 2,236 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 4

Rank

#216

was #216

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

933

#216 of 249

OVR Grade

68

#216 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Zapata	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
2	Wall	10% (-21)	—	—	—	—
3	Brownsville Pace	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
4	@Mission Sharyland	43% (-3)	—	—	—	—
5	@Brownsville Veterans Memorial (0-0) 1478	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—
7	Edinburg North (0-0) 663	76% (+11)	—	—	—	—
8	Edinburg Vela (0-0) 1516	8% (-23)	—	—	—	—
9	@Edinburg (0-0) 1029	40% (-4)	—	—	—	—
10	Weslaco (0-0) 1499	9% (-23)	—	—	—	—
11	@Edinburg Economedes (0-0) 1220	23% (-11)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		109	Edinburg Vela (5) Sabercats	76.9 1516	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.1-0.9	> 98%	D2
2		115	Weslaco (1) Panthers	76.6 1499	0-0	0-0	—	—	4-1	> 98%	D1
3		178	Edinburg Economedes (2) Jaguars	72.4 1220	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.8-2.2	90.8%	D1
4		203	Edinburg (6) Bobcats	69.5 1029	0-0	0-0	—	—	2-3	68.4%	D2
5		216	La Joya (4) Coyotes	68 933	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.6-3.5	36%	—
6		240	Edinburg North (3) Cougars	64 663	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.6-4.4	6.2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how La Joya’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2004

10-3

Rating 547 (61st)

#2 · 2005

9-3

Rating 515 (50th)

#3 · 2007

6-7

Rating 501 (45th)

#4 · 2018

6-4

Rating 458 (30th)

#5 · 2006

6-6

Rating 441 (25th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	5-6	901	34.2	40.6	−6.5	920	−4.6	+24.8	−29.4	765	−5.47	+0.16	−5.63	372(10th)
2024	1-9	210	13.9	31.0	−17.1	929	−22.4	+16.3	−38.7	533	−8.32	+0.01	−8.33	278(2nd)
2023	0-10	214	9.1	45.8	−36.7	896	−29.2	+30.7	−59.9	3	−9.64	0.00	−9.64	212(0th)
2022	2-9	704	13.5	33.5	−19.9	1061	−20.5	+16.9	−37.4	565	−8.04	+0.01	−8.05	323(5th)
2021	4-6	957	16.0	33.1	−17.1	1171	−16.4	+13.7	−30.1	748	−4.71	+0.09	−4.80	367(9th)
2019	4-6	1003	23.1	36.4	−13.3	1185	−10.1	+14.4	−24.6	886	−5.14	+0.14	−5.28	390(13th)
2018	6-4	1093	28.0	19.6	+8.4	1102	−6.1	+0.8	−6.8	1329	−3.23	+0.44	−3.67	458(30th)
2017	6-5	1087	16.7	17.0	−0.3	1060	−18.1	−1.1	−17.1	1074	−4.21	+0.28	−4.49	429(22nd)
2016	3-7	724	11.6	22.5	−10.9	1071	−23.1	+5.5	−28.7	784	−6.34	+0.09	−6.43	352(7th)
2015	3-7	754	11.9	27.8	−15.9	1147	−24.8	+4.8	−29.5	761	−5.98	+0.13	−6.11	351(7th)
2014	4-6	947	17.4	27.0	−9.6	1148	−16.7	+7.3	−24.0	900	−4.82	+0.07	−4.89	388(13th)
2013	1-9	449	11.0	27.6	−16.6	1083	−21.7	+11.8	−33.5	663	−7.93	+0.00	−7.93	313(3rd)
2012	2-8	608	12.4	32.7	−20.3	1035	−22.1	+15.9	−38.0	550	−7.32	+0.02	−7.34	313(3rd)
2011	2-8	685	9.4	33.0	−23.6	1147	−22.6	+14.0	−36.6	585	−6.83	+0.03	−6.86	327(5th)
2010	2-8	600	7.3	37.8	−30.5	1126	−27.1	+18.1	−45.2	370	−7.12	+0.12	−7.24	292(2nd)
2009	1-9	623	23.3	45.4	−22.1	1203	−12.6	+22.3	−34.8	629	−8.02	+0.04	−8.06	327(5th)
2008	3-6	949	22.8	29.3	−6.6	1062	−15.0	+8.6	−23.6	911	−5.40	+0.07	−5.47	395(14th)
2007	6-7	1441	19.2	21.6	−2.5	1312	−8.6	+0.1	−8.7	1282	−4.79	+0.47	−5.27	501(45th)
2006	6-6	1218	25.4	34.5	−9.1	1201	−7.5	+13.3	−20.8	979	−4.55	+0.22	−4.77	441(25th)
2005	9-3	1443	29.8	16.8	+13.0	1019	−3.9	+2.4	−6.3	1342	−2.17	+0.24	−2.41	515(50th)
2004	10-3	1512	30.5	16.8	+13.6	1104	−3.0	−3.5	+0.5	1512	−1.63	+0.39	−2.02	547(61st)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.