← Back
CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Edinburg Economedes Jaguars

Enrollment: 2,678 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#178
was #178
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1220
#178 of 249
OVR Grade
72.4
#178 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
McAllen
 42% (-3) — — — —
2
@La Joya Palmview
 72% (+9) — — — —
3
@Mission
 82% (+15) — — — —
5
PSJA North (0-0) 1658
 14% (-18) — — — —
6
@Edcouch-Elsa
 85% (+17) — — — —
7
@Edinburg (0-0) 1029
 69% (+8) — — — —
8
Weslaco (0-0) 1499
 24% (-11) — — — —
9
@Edinburg Vela (0-0) 1516
 22% (-12) — — — —
10
@Edinburg North (0-0) 663
 91% (+22) — — — —
11
La Joya (0-0) 933
 77% (+11) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 109
Sabercats
76.9
1516
0-0 0-0 — — 4.1-0.9 > 98% D2
2 115
Panthers
76.6
1499
0-0 0-0 — — 4-1 > 98% D1
3 178
Jaguars
72.4
1220
0-0 0-0 — — 2.8-2.2 90.8% D1
4 203
Bobcats
69.5
1029
0-0 0-0 — — 2-3 68.4% D2
5 216
Coyotes
68
933
0-0 0-0 — — 1.6-3.5 36% —
6 240
Cougars
64
663
0-0 0-0 — — 0.6-4.4 6.2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg Economedes’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
7-4
Rating 478 (36th)
#2 · 2025
8-3
Rating 467 (32nd)
#3 · 2012
6-5
Rating 452 (29th)
#4 · 2006
5-5
Rating 450 (28th)
#5 · 2013
7-4
Rating 450 (28th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-3 1188 42.0 22.6 +19.4 825 0.0 +8.6 −8.6 1284 −2.00 +0.31 −2.31 467(32nd)
2024 5-6 719 26.5 25.0 +1.5 862 −12.0 +11.0 −23.0 924 −5.30 +0.03 −5.33 377(11th)
2023 1-9 337 13.9 32.2 −18.3 823 −27.0 +18.6 −45.5 361 −8.76 +0.00 −8.77 271(1st)
2022 1-9 342 11.7 38.3 −26.6 949 −25.1 +23.9 −49.0 275 −8.57 +0.02 −8.60 252(1st)
2021 2-8 596 10.3 40.2 −29.9 1165 −22.2 +21.0 −43.2 419 −6.77 +0.01 −6.79 291(2nd)
2020 0-5 565 9.6 42.4 −32.8 1295 −20.5 +20.8 −41.3 468 −4.37 0.00 −4.37 —
2019 1-8 635 12.6 29.3 −16.8 1128 −22.3 +11.6 −33.9 653 −6.74 +0.00 −6.74 327(5th)
2018 4-6 976 13.3 17.1 −3.8 1129 −20.0 −0.6 −19.4 1015 −4.63 +0.04 −4.67 410(17th)
2017 4-6 1018 17.4 27.3 −9.9 1132 −15.5 +9.9 −25.4 866 −5.00 +0.10 −5.11 390(13th)
2016 7-4 1262 25.7 17.5 +8.3 1144 −7.1 −0.4 −6.7 1332 −2.72 +0.46 −3.17 478(36th)
2015 5-6 1155 21.5 26.6 −5.1 1195 −12.6 +4.8 −17.4 1066 −4.62 +0.13 −4.75 429(22nd)
2014 4-6 1129 28.9 30.8 −1.9 1130 −4.7 +12.3 −17.0 1076 −5.22 +0.09 −5.31 429(22nd)
2013 7-4 1233 22.8 20.2 +2.6 1117 −10.0 +3.4 −13.4 1165 −2.81 +0.22 −3.03 450(28th)
2012 6-5 1124 30.4 24.5 +5.9 1111 −2.6 +7.4 −10.1 1249 −3.51 +0.56 −4.07 452(29th)
2011 0-10 545 19.0 44.9 −25.9 1229 −13.9 +23.4 −37.2 569 −8.68 0.00 −8.68 312(3rd)
2010 3-7 865 23.0 33.3 −10.3 1219 −10.3 +11.2 −21.5 962 −5.68 +0.07 −5.75 394(14th)
2009 4-6 944 20.7 24.6 −3.9 1100 −14.8 +4.7 −19.5 1013 −4.92 +0.06 −4.98 407(16th)
2008 2-8 698 12.1 25.3 −13.2 1130 −22.3 +6.9 −29.2 770 −7.39 +0.06 −7.45 353(8th)
2007 5-5 1186 16.9 21.7 −4.8 1096 −14.6 +5.1 −19.6 1009 −3.96 +0.15 −4.11 431(22nd)
2006 5-5 1101 15.3 13.5 +1.8 1044 −17.0 −1.3 −15.6 1109 −4.42 +0.17 −4.59 450(28th)
2005 2-7 937 14.2 27.2 −13.0 1114 −16.3 +10.9 −27.1 822 −6.61 +0.05 −6.66 384(12th)
2004 4-5 1044 36.2 30.0 +6.2 1023 +0.6 +14.3 −13.8 1156 −4.69 +0.12 −4.80 441(25th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.