← Back
CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Edinburg Economedes Jaguars

Enrollment: 2,678 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#199
was #203
Record
2-4
1-0 district
Elo
1062
#199 of 249
OVR Grade
70
#199 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
67.6
#202 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
65.6
#205 of 249 in 6A
Perf
962
#204 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf AOS ADS WQ LQ
1
McAllen
 42% (-3) L 0-41 416 −29.2 +14.2 — −0.91
2
@La Joya Palmview
 62% (+5) L 21-24 988 −15.7 +4.7 — −0.97
3
@Mission
 70% (+8) W 38-13 1412 −4.3 −0.7 +0.01 —
5
PSJA North (5-1) 1798
 7% (-25) L 14-55 969 −7.8 +13.5 — −0.61
6
@Edcouch-Elsa
 61% (+4) L 30-35 948 −6.5 +15.5 — −0.97
7
@Edinburg (4-2) 874
 61% (+4) W 36-32 1037 +0.3 +18.9 +0.02 —
8
Weslaco (3-3) 1417
 18% (-14) — — — — — —
9
@Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690
 7% (-25) — — — — — —
10
@Edinburg North (0-6) 447
 93% (+25) — — — — — —
11
La Joya (3-3) 963
 60% (+4) — — — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 87
Sabercats
79.5
1690
 5-1 1-0 36.8 27.3 4.8-0.1 > 98% D2
2 142
Panthers
75.3
1417
 3-3 0-1 32.8 22.2 3.6-1.4 > 98% D1
3 199
Jaguars
70
1062
 2-4 1-0 23.2 33.3 2.8-2.2 97.2% D1
4 208
Coyotes
68.5
963
 3-3 1-0 36.8 35.7 2.2-2.8 76.7% D2
5 216
Bobcats
67.2
874
 4-2 0-1 27.2 19.8 1.4-3.6 26.5% —
6 244
Cougars
60.7
447
 0-6 0-1 13.5 47.5 0.2-4.8 < 2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg Economedes’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
7-4
Rating 478 (36th)
#2 · 2025
8-3
Rating 467 (32nd)
#3 · 2012
6-5
Rating 452 (29th)
#4 · 2006
5-5
Rating 450 (28th)
#5 · 2013
7-4
Rating 450 (28th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 8-3 1188 42.0 22.6 +19.4 825 0.0 +8.6 −8.6 1284 −2.00 +0.31 −2.31 467(32nd)
2024 5-6 719 26.5 25.0 +1.5 862 −12.0 +11.0 −23.0 924 −5.30 +0.03 −5.33 377(11th)
2023 1-9 337 13.9 32.2 −18.3 823 −27.0 +18.6 −45.5 361 −8.76 +0.00 −8.77 271(1st)
2022 1-9 342 11.7 38.3 −26.6 949 −25.1 +23.9 −49.0 275 −8.57 +0.02 −8.60 252(1st)
2021 2-8 596 10.3 40.2 −29.9 1165 −22.2 +21.0 −43.2 419 −6.77 +0.01 −6.79 291(2nd)
2020 0-5 565 9.6 42.4 −32.8 1295 −20.5 +20.8 −41.3 468 −4.37 0.00 −4.37 —
2019 1-8 635 12.6 29.3 −16.8 1128 −22.3 +11.6 −33.9 653 −6.74 +0.00 −6.74 327(5th)
2018 4-6 976 13.3 17.1 −3.8 1129 −20.0 −0.6 −19.4 1015 −4.63 +0.04 −4.67 410(17th)
2017 4-6 1018 17.4 27.3 −9.9 1132 −15.5 +9.9 −25.4 866 −5.00 +0.10 −5.11 390(13th)
2016 7-4 1262 25.7 17.5 +8.3 1144 −7.1 −0.4 −6.7 1332 −2.72 +0.46 −3.17 478(36th)
2015 5-6 1155 21.5 26.6 −5.1 1195 −12.6 +4.8 −17.4 1066 −4.62 +0.13 −4.75 429(22nd)
2014 4-6 1129 28.9 30.8 −1.9 1130 −4.7 +12.3 −17.0 1076 −5.22 +0.09 −5.31 429(22nd)
2013 7-4 1233 22.8 20.2 +2.6 1117 −10.0 +3.4 −13.4 1165 −2.81 +0.22 −3.03 450(28th)
2012 6-5 1124 30.4 24.5 +5.9 1111 −2.6 +7.4 −10.1 1249 −3.51 +0.56 −4.07 452(29th)
2011 0-10 545 19.0 44.9 −25.9 1229 −13.9 +23.4 −37.2 569 −8.68 0.00 −8.68 312(3rd)
2010 3-7 865 23.0 33.3 −10.3 1219 −10.3 +11.2 −21.5 962 −5.68 +0.07 −5.75 394(14th)
2009 4-6 944 20.7 24.6 −3.9 1100 −14.8 +4.7 −19.5 1013 −4.92 +0.06 −4.98 407(16th)
2008 2-8 698 12.1 25.3 −13.2 1130 −22.3 +6.9 −29.2 770 −7.39 +0.06 −7.45 353(8th)
2007 5-5 1186 16.9 21.7 −4.8 1096 −14.6 +5.1 −19.6 1009 −3.96 +0.15 −4.11 431(22nd)
2006 5-5 1101 15.3 13.5 +1.8 1044 −17.0 −1.3 −15.6 1109 −4.42 +0.17 −4.59 450(28th)
2005 2-7 937 14.2 27.2 −13.0 1114 −16.3 +10.9 −27.1 822 −6.61 +0.05 −6.66 384(12th)
2004 4-5 1044 36.2 30.0 +6.2 1023 +0.6 +14.3 −13.8 1156 −4.69 +0.12 −4.80 441(25th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.