| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Corpus Christi Veterans |
32% (-7) | L 7-10 | 1653 | −16.4 | −22.6 | — | −0.65 |
| 2 | San Benito (4-2) 1282 |
71% (+9) | W 55-25 | 1908 | +24.2 | +7.8 | +0.08 | — |
| 3 | PSJA North (5-1) 1798 |
30% (-8) | W 42-40 | 2044 | +20.2 | −1.5 | +0.41 | — |
| 4 | Edcouch-Elsa |
97% (+33) | W 31-14 | 1498 | −5.5 | −5.5 | +0.01 | — |
| 5 | @Los Fresnos (3-3) 1360 |
67% (+7) | W 49-42 | 1529 | +13.0 | +11.9 | +0.15 | — |
| 7 | Weslaco (3-3) 1417 |
71% (+9) | W 37-33 | 1598 | +9.4 | +5.4 | +0.16 | — |
| 8 | @La Joya (3-3) 963 |
95% (+29) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Edinburg Economedes (2-4) 1062 |
93% (+25) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | @Edinburg (4-2) 874 |
97% (+33) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | Edinburg North (0-6) 447 |
> 98% (+50) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#87
was #90
Record
5-1
1-0 district
Elo
1690
#87 of 249
OVR Grade
79.5
#87 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
80.2
#75 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
75.6
#111 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1705
#89 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 31-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance
Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg Vela’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2018
12-1
Rating 680 (92nd)
#2 · 2021
12-1
Rating 658 (89th)
#3 · 2019
9-4
Rating 592 (76th)
#4 · 2017
12-1
Rating 588 (74th)
#5 · 2016
9-2
Rating 547 (61st)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.