← Back
CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Edinburg Bobcats

Enrollment: 2,154 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6
Rank
#203
was #203
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
1029
#203 of 249
OVR Grade
69.5
#203 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
1
@Brownsville Hanna
 80% (+13) — — — —
2
Weslaco East
 81% (+14) — — — —
3
@PSJA Memorial
 93% (+25) — — — —
4
Brownsville Rivera
 78% (+12) — — — —
5
@Edcouch-Elsa
 72% (+9) — — — —
7
Edinburg Economedes (0-0) 1220
 31% (-8) — — — —
8
@Edinburg North (0-0) 663
 82% (+15) — — — —
9
La Joya (0-0) 933
 60% (+4) — — — —
10
Edinburg Vela (0-0) 1516
 11% (-20) — — — —
11
@Weslaco (0-0) 1499
 12% (-19) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 109
Sabercats
76.9
1516
0-0 0-0 — — 4.1-0.9 > 98% D2
2 115
Panthers
76.6
1499
0-0 0-0 — — 4-1 > 98% D1
3 178
Jaguars
72.4
1220
0-0 0-0 — — 2.8-2.2 90.8% D1
4 203
Bobcats
69.5
1029
0-0 0-0 — — 2-3 68.4% D2
5 216
Coyotes
68
933
0-0 0-0 — — 1.6-3.5 36% —
6 240
Cougars
64
663
0-0 0-0 — — 0.6-4.4 6.2% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2010
10-3
Rating 559 (65th)
#2 · 2011
6-5
Rating 483 (38th)
#3 · 2025
7-5
Rating 480 (37th)
#4 · 2009
6-6
Rating 475 (35th)
#5 · 2005
5-6
Rating 470 (33rd)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 7-5 1284 18.5 17.1 +1.4 1152 −16.5 −4.6 −11.9 1203 −3.48 +0.54 −4.02 480(37th)
2024 5-6 892 15.7 22.7 −7.0 1071 −17.9 +4.1 −22.0 950 −4.96 +0.07 −5.03 396(14th)
2023 4-7 956 22.6 33.4 −10.7 1136 −11.8 +13.2 −25.0 874 −5.49 +0.04 −5.53 395(14th)
2022 5-6 1068 21.0 27.1 −6.1 1209 −10.9 +7.6 −18.5 1039 −4.39 +0.22 −4.62 419(19th)
2021 5-6 1236 22.9 19.5 +3.5 1181 −8.7 +0.2 −8.9 1277 −4.30 +0.36 −4.66 463(31st)
2020 3-2 1213 23.4 28.6 −5.2 1210 −7.6 +6.9 −14.5 1137 −1.25 +0.10 −1.35 —
2019 4-6 986 19.0 27.4 −8.4 1141 −15.2 +8.1 −23.2 919 −4.71 +0.03 −4.75 394(14th)
2018 7-4 1264 25.5 20.5 +4.9 1185 −6.5 +2.0 −8.5 1287 −2.37 +0.15 −2.51 468(33rd)
2017 6-5 1224 23.7 23.1 +0.6 1067 −10.5 +6.9 −17.5 1064 −3.91 +0.20 −4.11 435(23rd)
2016 7-4 1181 17.2 19.5 −2.4 1083 −16.8 +1.4 −18.2 1045 −2.85 +0.31 −3.17 429(22nd)
2015 1-9 753 9.6 38.4 −28.8 1218 −24.1 +15.9 −40.0 499 −8.04 +0.03 −8.07 316(4th)
2014 2-8 767 6.7 34.9 −28.2 1181 −25.4 +13.9 −39.3 517 −7.25 +0.10 −7.35 321(4th)
2013 2-8 868 11.6 20.6 −9.0 1230 −18.7 +1.7 −20.4 991 −6.75 +0.02 −6.76 395(14th)
2012 3-7 1044 18.4 23.7 −5.3 1140 −13.8 +4.8 −18.6 1035 −5.82 +0.05 −5.87 417(19th)
2011 6-5 1308 25.6 19.7 +5.9 1192 −8.0 −1.5 −6.5 1339 −3.72 +0.14 −3.86 483(38th)
2010 10-3 1588 30.5 15.7 +14.8 1225 −3.1 −6.2 +3.1 1577 −0.92 +0.85 −1.77 559(65th)
2009 6-6 1232 19.3 19.5 −0.2 1250 −12.4 −2.7 −9.7 1257 −4.28 +0.38 −4.66 475(35th)
2008 4-6 955 14.6 25.9 −11.3 1239 −16.8 +5.4 −22.2 945 −4.94 +0.35 −5.29 400(15th)
2007 0-10 557 15.4 33.4 −18.0 1245 −12.4 +15.5 −27.9 802 −9.15 0.00 −9.15 346(7th)
2006 3-7 781 17.0 21.4 −4.4 1090 −13.4 +7.1 −20.5 988 −6.30 +0.11 −6.41 391(13th)
2005 5-6 1228 21.5 19.1 +2.4 1196 −9.2 +0.1 −9.3 1267 −4.92 +0.15 −5.06 470(33rd)
2004 7-5 1195 25.3 27.1 −1.8 1079 −9.8 +8.8 −18.6 1035 −4.43 +0.25 −4.68 449(27th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.