← Back

CLASS 6A · District 31-6A

Edinburg Bobcats

Enrollment: 2,154 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 6

Rank

#216

was #214

Record

4-2

0-1 district

Elo

874

#216 of 249

OVR Grade

67.2

#216 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

63.8

#225 of 249 in 6A

DEF Grade

69.2

#178 of 249 in 6A

Perf

933

#207 of 249 in 6A

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	AOS	ADS	WQ	LQ
1	@Brownsville Hanna	80% (+13)	W 17-8	990	−25.7	−5.3	+0.01	—
2	Weslaco East	84% (+15)	W 31-12	1115	−14.2	+1.2	+0.01	—
3	@PSJA Memorial	95% (+27)	W 32-14	842	−18.2	+8.2	+0.00	—
4	Brownsville Rivera	83% (+15)	W 37-13	1282	−7.4	+1.4	+0.01	—
5	@Edcouch-Elsa	81% (+14)	L 14-36	523	−22.5	+16.5	—	−0.99
7	Edinburg Economedes (2-4) 1062	39% (-4)	L 32-36	847	−7.3	+18.9	—	−0.97
8	@Edinburg North (0-6) 447	86% (+17)	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	La Joya (3-3) 963	41% (-4)	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	Edinburg Vela (5-1) 1690	3% (-33)	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	@Weslaco (3-3) 1417	9% (-22)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 31-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		87	Edinburg Vela (5) Sabercats	79.5 1690	5-1	1-0	36.8	27.3	4.8-0.1	> 98%	D2
2		142	Weslaco (1) Panthers	75.3 1417	3-3	0-1	32.8	22.2	3.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3		199	Edinburg Economedes (2) Jaguars	70 1062	2-4	1-0	23.2	33.3	2.8-2.2	97.2%	D1
4		208	La Joya (4) Coyotes	68.5 963	3-3	1-0	36.8	35.7	2.2-2.8	76.7%	D2
5		216	Edinburg (6) Bobcats	67.2 874	4-2	0-1	27.2	19.8	1.4-3.6	26.5%	—
6		244	Edinburg North (3) Cougars	60.7 447	0-6	0-1	13.5	47.5	0.2-4.8	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Edinburg’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2010

10-3

Rating 559 (65th)

#2 · 2011

6-5

Rating 483 (38th)

#3 · 2025

7-5

Rating 480 (37th)

#4 · 2009

6-6

Rating 475 (35th)

#5 · 2005

5-6

Rating 470 (33rd)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	7-5	1284	18.5	17.1	+1.4	1152	−16.5	−4.6	−11.9	1203	−3.48	+0.54	−4.02	480(37th)
2024	5-6	892	15.7	22.7	−7.0	1071	−17.9	+4.1	−22.0	950	−4.96	+0.07	−5.03	396(14th)
2023	4-7	956	22.6	33.4	−10.7	1136	−11.8	+13.2	−25.0	874	−5.49	+0.04	−5.53	395(14th)
2022	5-6	1068	21.0	27.1	−6.1	1209	−10.9	+7.6	−18.5	1039	−4.39	+0.22	−4.62	419(19th)
2021	5-6	1236	22.9	19.5	+3.5	1181	−8.7	+0.2	−8.9	1277	−4.30	+0.36	−4.66	463(31st)
2020	3-2	1213	23.4	28.6	−5.2	1210	−7.6	+6.9	−14.5	1137	−1.25	+0.10	−1.35	—
2019	4-6	986	19.0	27.4	−8.4	1141	−15.2	+8.1	−23.2	919	−4.71	+0.03	−4.75	394(14th)
2018	7-4	1264	25.5	20.5	+4.9	1185	−6.5	+2.0	−8.5	1287	−2.37	+0.15	−2.51	468(33rd)
2017	6-5	1224	23.7	23.1	+0.6	1067	−10.5	+6.9	−17.5	1064	−3.91	+0.20	−4.11	435(23rd)
2016	7-4	1181	17.2	19.5	−2.4	1083	−16.8	+1.4	−18.2	1045	−2.85	+0.31	−3.17	429(22nd)
2015	1-9	753	9.6	38.4	−28.8	1218	−24.1	+15.9	−40.0	499	−8.04	+0.03	−8.07	316(4th)
2014	2-8	767	6.7	34.9	−28.2	1181	−25.4	+13.9	−39.3	517	−7.25	+0.10	−7.35	321(4th)
2013	2-8	868	11.6	20.6	−9.0	1230	−18.7	+1.7	−20.4	991	−6.75	+0.02	−6.76	395(14th)
2012	3-7	1044	18.4	23.7	−5.3	1140	−13.8	+4.8	−18.6	1035	−5.82	+0.05	−5.87	417(19th)
2011	6-5	1308	25.6	19.7	+5.9	1192	−8.0	−1.5	−6.5	1339	−3.72	+0.14	−3.86	483(38th)
2010	10-3	1588	30.5	15.7	+14.8	1225	−3.1	−6.2	+3.1	1577	−0.92	+0.85	−1.77	559(65th)
2009	6-6	1232	19.3	19.5	−0.2	1250	−12.4	−2.7	−9.7	1257	−4.28	+0.38	−4.66	475(35th)
2008	4-6	955	14.6	25.9	−11.3	1239	−16.8	+5.4	−22.2	945	−4.94	+0.35	−5.29	400(15th)
2007	0-10	557	15.4	33.4	−18.0	1245	−12.4	+15.5	−27.9	802	−9.15	0.00	−9.15	346(7th)
2006	3-7	781	17.0	21.4	−4.4	1090	−13.4	+7.1	−20.5	988	−6.30	+0.11	−6.41	391(13th)
2005	5-6	1228	21.5	19.1	+2.4	1196	−9.2	+0.1	−9.3	1267	−4.92	+0.15	−5.06	470(33rd)
2004	7-5	1195	25.3	27.1	−1.8	1079	−9.8	+8.8	−18.6	1035	−4.43	+0.25	−4.68	449(27th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.