← Back

CLASS 6A · District 5-6A

Lewisville Fighting Farmers

Enrollment: 3,771 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 1

Rank

#29

was #29

Record

0-0

0-0 district

Elo

2080

#29 of 249

OVR Grade

85.4

#29 of 249 in 6A

OFF Grade

—

DEF Grade

—

Perf

—

Schedule & Results

Wk	Opponent (Rec) Elo	Proj WP%	Result	Perf	WQ	LQ
1	Highland Park	43% (-3)	—	—	—	—
2	#30Byron Nelson (0-0) 2077	50% (+0)	—	—	—	—
3	@Denton Ryan	72% (+9)	—	—	—	—
5	Flower Mound Marcus (0-0) 1680	84% (+16)	—	—	—	—
6	@Frisco Wakeland (0-0) 1507	92% (+23)	—	—	—	—
7	#11Denton Guyer (0-0) 2421	19% (-14)	—	—	—	—
8	Lewisville Hebron (0-0) 1750	80% (+13)	—	—	—	—
9	@Flower Mound (0-0) 1430	94% (+26)	—	—	—	—
10	Denton Braswell (0-0) 1358	95% (+29)	—	—	—	—
11	@Little Elm (0-0) 1150	> 98% (+37)	—	—	—	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 5-6A

Rk			Team (Enroll Rk)	OVR/Elo	Overall	District	PPG	PAPG	ProjRec	PO%	Bracket
1		11	Denton Guyer (6) Wildcats	90.5 2421	0-0	0-0	—	—	6.6-0.4	> 98%	D2
2		29	Lewisville (1) Fighting Farmers	85.4 2080	0-0	0-0	—	—	5.6-1.4	> 98%	D1
3		67	Lewisville Hebron (2) Hawks	80.4 1750	0-0	0-0	—	—	4.1-2.9	81.8%	D1
4		81	Flower Mound Marcus (4) Marauders	79.3 1680	0-0	0-0	—	—	3.7-3.3	69.9%	D2
5		113	Frisco Wakeland (8) Wolverines	76.7 1507	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.7-4.3	25.4%	—
6		140	Flower Mound (3) Jaguars	75.6 1430	0-0	0-0	—	—	2.3-4.7	14.6%	—
7		155	Denton Braswell (5) Bengals	74.5 1358	0-0	0-0	—	—	1.9-5.1	8.3%	—
8		190	Little Elm (7) Lobos	71.3 1150	0-0	0-0	—	—	0.9-6.1	< 2%	—
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Lewisville’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2022

12-2

Rating 719 (95th)

#2 · 2021

11-2

Rating 681 (92nd)

#3 · 2024

7-4

Rating 665 (90th)

#4 · 2023

8-3

Rating 664 (90th)

#5 · 2025

8-3

Rating 649 (87th)

Team Performance History

Year	Record	Final Elo	PPG	PAPG	Margin	Elo SOS	AOS	ADS	DOM	Perf	RQ	WQ	LQ	All-Time Rating (%ile)
2025	8-3	2038	32.4	23.0	+9.4	1777	+10.8	−10.6	+21.4	2036	+1.68	+2.28	−0.60	649(87th)
2024	7-4	2126	32.5	22.3	+10.3	1812	+8.5	−14.5	+23.0	2076	+1.53	+2.44	−0.91	665(90th)
2023	8-3	2073	32.2	12.2	+20.0	1520	+3.8	−16.7	+20.5	2013	+0.24	+1.45	−1.21	664(90th)
2022	12-2	2337	29.1	13.3	+15.8	1753	+6.2	−20.7	+26.9	2173	+4.39	+4.63	−0.24	719(95th)
2021	11-2	2294	36.8	24.3	+12.5	1735	+12.6	−11.7	+24.3	2106	+3.80	+4.14	−0.33	681(92nd)
2020	7-4	2010	42.7	36.5	+6.2	1747	+19.1	+1.0	+18.1	1952	+0.68	+2.56	−1.88	631(84th)
2019	7-4	1771	38.5	24.4	+14.2	1488	+10.1	−3.9	+14.0	1850	−0.63	+0.82	−1.45	588(74th)
2018	9-3	1883	24.7	18.8	+5.9	1567	−0.8	−9.9	+9.0	1726	+0.94	+2.62	−1.68	594(76th)
2017	2-7	1314	13.6	28.2	−14.7	1731	−8.7	−3.4	−5.3	1368	−3.66	+0.61	−4.27	484(38th)
2016	3-7	1341	22.8	32.5	−9.7	1756	−2.1	−1.1	−1.0	1474	−2.21	+1.26	−3.47	504(46th)
2015	4-6	1540	21.9	30.9	−9.0	1838	+0.1	−4.3	+4.4	1609	−1.63	+0.96	−2.60	547(61st)
2014	4-6	1580	27.4	36.4	−9.0	1840	+5.5	+0.9	+4.6	1615	−1.53	+0.79	−2.32	552(63rd)
2013	3-7	1310	11.7	28.5	−16.8	1808	−7.9	−4.0	−3.9	1402	−3.04	+0.67	−3.71	498(43rd)
2012	1-9	1258	17.7	28.9	−11.2	1730	−2.9	−1.7	−1.2	1470	−4.74	+0.01	−4.76	496(42nd)
2011	2-8	1365	19.7	32.9	−13.2	1773	−3.6	−2.0	−1.6	1461	−3.15	+0.07	−3.22	510(48th)
2010	3-7	1456	26.8	38.0	−11.2	1738	+1.2	+2.6	−1.4	1464	−2.35	+0.77	−3.12	516(50th)
2009	2-9	1322	17.4	45.5	−28.2	1854	−5.6	+7.5	−13.1	1172	−2.78	+0.07	−2.85	475(35th)
2008	2-8	1369	15.7	27.3	−11.6	1739	−6.0	−4.2	−1.7	1457	−4.00	+0.23	−4.23	507(47th)
2007	8-4	1799	24.5	15.8	+8.7	1554	+0.2	−9.6	+9.8	1745	−0.06	+1.97	−2.03	594(76th)
2006	5-6	1543	17.5	16.5	+0.9	1528	−6.9	−9.3	+2.4	1559	−2.68	+0.55	−3.23	542(59th)
2005	1-9	1172	11.9	30.1	−18.2	1693	−8.5	+1.6	−10.1	1247	−6.09	+0.03	−6.12	463(31st)
2004	5-5	1590	21.9	26.9	−5.0	1561	−1.8	+0.1	−1.9	1452	−1.88	+1.25	−3.13	530(55th)
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).

Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.

AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.

ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.

DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.

Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.

RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.

WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.

LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.

All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.