| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leander Glenn |
56% (+2) | L 3-14 | 925 | −31.0 | −8.0 | — | −0.96 |
| 2 | @Pflugerville Hendrickson |
14% (-18) | L 45-51 | 1365 | +17.3 | +22.7 | — | −0.81 |
| 3 | Waco University |
41% (-3) | W 45-21 | 1591 | +6.8 | +3.2 | +0.05 | — |
| 4 | Austin Bowie (5-1) 1816 |
9% (-23) | L 21-47 | 1303 | −1.0 | +6.9 | — | −0.61 |
| 5 | 2% (-37) | L 25-45 | 1447 | +0.3 | +2.5 | — | −0.28 | |
| 6 | Round Rock Westwood (1-6) 1059 |
52% (+1) | W 29-17 | 1342 | −6.2 | +0.2 | +0.05 | — |
| 7 | @Round Rock McNeil (0-7) 1099 |
56% (+2) | W 57-39 | 1275 | +7.1 | +16.1 | +0.06 | — |
| 8 | #33Lake Travis (2-2-1) 2062 |
5% (-29) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Round Rock Cedar Ridge (7-0) 1852 |
10% (-21) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | #15Austin Westlake (5-1) 2332 |
< 2% (-40) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#158
was #168
Record
3-4
2-1 district
Elo
1335
#158 of 249
OVR Grade
74.1
#158 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
74.3
#130 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
69.7
#175 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1321
#155 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 25-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance


Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Round Rock Stony Point’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2010
13-1
Rating 782 (98th)
#2 · 2008
13-2
Rating 752 (97th)
#3 · 2009
12-2
Rating 741 (97th)
#4 · 2007
9-3
Rating 656 (89th)
#5 · 2014
6-4
Rating 580 (72nd)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.





