← Back
CLASS 6A · District 25-6A

Lake Travis Cavaliers

Enrollment: 3,428 · Dist. Enr. Rk · 2
Rank
#18
was #18
Record
0-0
0-0 district
Elo
2244
#18 of 249
OVR Grade
87.8
#18 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
—
DEF Grade
—
Perf
—

Schedule & Results

Wk Opponent (Rec) Elo Proj WP% Result Perf WQ LQ
2
@Pflugerville Weiss
 73% (+10) — — — —
3
@#17Cibolo Steele (0-0) 2273
 47% (-1) — — — —
4
@San Antonio Cornerstone Christian
 > 98% (+70) — — — —
5
@Round Rock McNeil (0-0) 1523
 95% (+29) — — — —
7
Round Rock Cedar Ridge (0-0) 1475
 96% (+31) — — — —
8
@Round Rock Stony Point (0-0) 1159
 > 98% (+43) — — — —
9
#15Austin Westlake (0-0) 2295
 45% (-2) — — — —
10
@Round Rock (0-0) 1849
 84% (+16) — — — —
11
Round Rock Westwood (0-0) 1299
 > 98% (+38) — — — —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

District Standings Projection - District 25-6A

Rk Team (Enroll Rk) OVR/Elo Overall District PPG PAPG ProjRec PO% Bracket
1 15
Chaparrals
88.6
2295
0-0 0-0 — — 5.3-0.7 > 98% D2
2 18
Cavaliers
87.8
2244
0-0 0-0 — — 5.2-0.8 > 98% D1
3 55
Dragons
81.9
1849
0-0 0-0 — — 3.8-2.2 94.8% D1
4 106
Mavericks
76.9
1523
0-0 0-0 — — 2.4-3.6 55.7% D2
5 125
Raiders
76.2
1475
0-0 0-0 — — 2.2-3.8 34.9% —
6 167
Warriors
73.6
1299
0-0 0-0 — — 1.4-4.6 11.1% —
7 188
Tigers
71.5
1159
0-0 0-0 — — 0.8-5.2 3.6% —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com

Since 2004

Historical Performance

Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Lake Travis’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.

Best TNG Rated Seasons

#1 · 2016
15-1
Rating 903 (100th)
#2 · 2015
15-1
Rating 820 (99th)
#3 · 2017
13-3
Rating 816 (99th)
#4 · 2019
13-2
Rating 770 (98th)
#5 · 2021
12-3
Rating 769 (98th)

Team Performance History

Year Record Final
Elo		 PPG PAPG Margin Elo
SOS		 AOS ADS DOM Perf RQ WQ LQ All-Time
Rating (%ile)
2025 14-1 2526 37.1 13.4 +23.7 1735 +13.3 −21.5 +34.8 2370 +5.84 +5.88 −0.04 759(98th)
2024 12-2 2340 44.7 15.8 +28.9 1653 +16.9 −17.9 +34.8 2370 +4.11 +4.21 −0.10 740(97th)
2023 11-3 2269 33.3 13.2 +20.1 1680 +9.5 −17.9 +27.4 2185 +3.35 +3.80 −0.45 719(95th)
2022 7-5 2165 37.8 22.0 +15.8 1808 +14.9 −13.3 +28.2 2206 +1.12 +2.00 −0.89 693(93rd)
2021 12-3 2456 45.8 23.4 +22.4 1906 +23.2 −14.8 +38.1 2452 +4.92 +5.04 −0.12 769(98th)
2020 6-1 2269 52.6 18.3 +34.3 1619 +24.2 −14.5 +38.7 2468 +0.79 +1.18 −0.39 —
2019 13-2 2527 45.4 19.3 +26.1 1851 +21.9 −17.9 +39.8 2495 +5.10 +5.63 −0.53 770(98th)
2018 12-2 2589 45.1 22.9 +22.3 1786 +21.9 −12.7 +34.6 2366 +5.08 +5.20 −0.12 759(98th)
2017 13-3 2770 43.3 22.3 +21.0 1964 +21.9 −17.5 +39.4 2484 +5.88 +6.13 −0.25 816(99th)
2016 15-1 2942 51.9 13.0 +38.9 1896 +32.3 −22.5 +54.7 2868 +7.42 +7.54 −0.11 903(100th)
2015 15-1 2635 48.1 13.4 +34.7 1807 +24.4 −21.2 +45.6 2640 +7.08 +7.10 −0.02 820(99th)
2014 10-2 2262 49.7 14.6 +35.1 1551 +20.0 −16.7 +36.7 2419 +2.03 +2.62 −0.59 731(96th)
2013 12-2 2381 40.0 14.3 +25.7 1692 +14.1 −18.0 +32.1 2303 +4.36 +4.84 −0.48 740(97th)
2012 9-2 2134 32.2 14.5 +17.7 1567 +8.1 −13.1 +21.2 2031 +1.54 +2.50 −0.96 659(89th)
2011 1-0 2201 35.0 7.0 +28.0 2035 +19.9 −34.3 +54.2 2855 +0.49 +0.49 0.00 —
2010 1-0 2193 32.0 21.0 +11.0 1855 +10.6 −16.3 +26.9 2173 +0.88 +0.88 0.00 —
2009 3-0 2065 50.3 23.0 +27.3 2034 +32.0 −13.7 +45.7 2643 +1.37 +1.37 0.00 —
2008 2-0 1775 36.5 19.0 +17.5 1890 +16.6 −15.6 +32.2 2305 +0.83 +0.83 0.00 —
2007 1-1 1444 19.5 19.0 +0.5 1635 +0.1 −10.1 +10.1 1753 +0.11 +0.52 −0.41 —
2006 0-2 1237 8.5 36.5 −28.0 1978 −10.6 −1.9 −8.7 1282 −1.22 0.00 −1.22 —
2005 1-0 1352 45.0 13.0 +32.0 1050 +5.6 −8.0 +13.6 1841 +0.03 +0.03 0.00 —
2004 1-0 1292 58.0 30.0 +28.0 1009 +21.1 +14.3 +6.7 1669 +0.03 +0.03 0.00 —
Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.