| Wk | Opponent (Rec) Elo | Proj WP% | Result | Perf | AOS | ADS | WQ | LQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pflugerville Weiss |
35% (-6) | L 28-42 | 1652 | +10.0 | +4.0 | — | −0.35 |
| 2 | @Temple (1-6) 1448 |
62% (+5) | W 49-37 | 1774 | +15.0 | +4.0 | +0.32 | — |
| 3 | #26Dripping Springs (5-1) 2153 |
17% (-15) | W 35-25 | 2494 | +18.4 | −21.3 | +0.83 | — |
| 4 | 42% (-3) | W 41-38 | 2043 | +21.9 | +0.2 | +0.74 | — | |
| 5 | Round Rock Stony Point (3-4) 1335 |
98% (+37) | W 45-25 | 1850 | +10.2 | −3.8 | +0.05 | — |
| 6 | 31% (-7) | L 17-38 | 1930 | +6.4 | −10.8 | — | −0.15 | |
| 8 | Round Rock Westwood (1-6) 1059 |
> 98% (+38) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | @Round Rock McNeil (0-7) 1099 |
98% (+37) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | #33Lake Travis (2-2-1) 2062 |
45% (-2) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Round Rock Cedar Ridge (7-0) 1852 |
67% (+7) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||
Rank
#42
was #43
Record
4-2
1-1 district
Elo
2019
#42 of 249
OVR Grade
84.4
#42 of 249 in 6A
OFF Grade
84.6
#42 of 249 in 6A
DEF Grade
78.9
#84 of 249 in 6A
Perf
1957
#54 of 249 in 6A
Schedule & Results
District Standings Projection - District 25-6A
| Rk | Team (Enroll Rk) | OVR/ |
Overall | District | PPG | PAPG | ProjRec | PO% | Bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | |||||||||||
| ProjRec, PO%, and Bracket represent the result of 10,000 Monte Carlo season simulations from this point forward based on each team's current Elo | |||||||||||
Since 2004
Historical Performance


Shaded band is the 6A league mean Elo ± 1 standard deviation for that season; the dashed gray line is the league mean. The four colored dashed lines mark the Elo needed that season to rank Top 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 among all qualifying 6A team-seasons (min. 8 games) — a rough gauge of how Round Rock’s season stacked up against the state’s best year over year.
Best TNG Rated Seasons
#1 · 2021
9-2
Rating 695 (93rd)
#2 · 2014
10-2
Rating 683 (92nd)
#3 · 2016
10-4
Rating 676 (91st)
#4 · 2022
9-2
Rating 665 (90th)
#5 · 2006
9-4
Rating 661 (89th)
Team Performance History
| Year | Record | Final Elo |
PPG | PAPG | Margin | Elo SOS |
AOS | ADS | DOM | Perf | RQ | WQ | LQ | All-Time Rating (%ile) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradition Never Graduates 2026 | @TexasTNG | texastng.com | ||||||||||||||
Margin — Average scoring margin (PPG minus PAPG).
Elo SOS — Average Elo of opponents faced that season, using each opponent's final season Elo.
AOS — Adjusted Offensive Scoring — scoring output compared to the expected average team's offensive performance, adjusted for opponents' defensive strength.
ADS — Adjusted Defensive Scoring — scoring allowed compared to the expected average defensive team's performance, adjusted for opponents' offensive strength; lower (more negative) is better.
DOM — Dominance — AOS minus ADS, combined scoring-margin efficiency.
Perf — Performance Elo — that season's DOM translated onto the Elo scale, an independent check on Elo itself.
RQ — Resume Quality — net wins above a second-round-quality opponent (WQ + LQ) for the season. Typically runs about −10 to +10: 0 is a break-even resume against that bar, the median qualifying season sits around −1, and +5 or better is an elite, deep-playoff-caliber resume.
WQ — Win Quality — resume credit earned from wins only, weighted by opponent strength. Each win's credit is benchmarked against a hypothetical ~1850 Elo opponent (roughly a second-round-playoff-quality team) — beating a team stronger than that earns close to full credit, beating a much weaker team earns very little.
LQ — Loss Quality — resume cost from losses only, weighted by opponent strength.
All-Time Rating — 0–990 composite score ranked against every qualifying 6A team-season since 2004; parenthetical is the all-time percentile.





